School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 28;5(5):CD013042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013042.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Manual therapy and prescribed exercises are often provided together or separately in contemporary clinical practice to treat people with lateral elbow pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both for adults with lateral elbow pain. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, and trial registries until 31 January 2024, unrestricted by language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised or quasi-randomised trials. Participants were adults with lateral elbow pain. Interventions were manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both. Primary comparators were placebo or minimal or no intervention. We also included comparisons of manual therapy and prescribed exercises with either intervention alone, with or without glucocorticoid injection. Exclusions were trials testing a single application of an intervention or comparison of different types of manual therapy or prescribed exercises. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial characteristics and numerical data, and assessed study risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. The main comparisons were manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both compared with placebo treatment, and with minimal or no intervention. Major outcomes were pain, disability, heath-related quality of life, participant-reported treatment success, participant withdrawals, adverse events and serious adverse events. The primary endpoint was end of intervention for pain, disability, health-related quality of life and participant-reported treatment success and final time point for adverse events and withdrawals. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three trials (1612 participants) met our inclusion criteria (mean age ranged from 38 to 52 years, 47% female, 70% dominant arm affected). One trial (23 participants) compared manual therapy to placebo manual therapy, 12 trials (1124 participants) compared manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both to minimal or no intervention, six trials (228 participants) compared manual therapy and exercise to exercise alone, one trial (60 participants) compared the addition of manual therapy to prescribed exercises and glucocorticoid injection, and four trials (177 participants) assessed the addition of manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both to glucocorticoid injection. Twenty-one trials without placebo control were susceptible to performance and detection bias as participants were not blinded to the intervention. Other biases included selection (nine trials, 39%, including two quasi-randomised), attrition (eight trials, 35%) and selective reporting (15 trials, 65%) biases. We report the results of the main comparisons. Manual therapy versus placebo manual therapy Low-certainty evidence, based upon a single trial (23 participants) and downgraded due to indirectness and imprecision, indicates manual therapy may reduce pain and elbow disability at the end of two to three weeks of treatment. Mean pain at the end of treatment was 4.1 points with placebo (0 to 10 scale) and 2.0 points with manual therapy, MD -2.1 points (95% CI -4.2 to -0.1). Mean disability was 40 points with placebo (0 to 100 scale) and 15 points with manual therapy, MD -25 points (95% CI -43 to -7). There was no follow-up beyond the end of treatment to show if these effects were sustained, and no other major outcomes were reported. Manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both versus minimal intervention Low-certainty evidence indicates manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both may slightly reduce pain and disability at the end of treatment, but the effects were not sustained, and there may be little to no improvement in health-related quality of life or number of participants reporting treatment success. We downgraded the evidence due to increased risk of performance bias and detection bias across all the trials, and indirectness due to the multimodal nature of the interventions included in the trials. At four weeks to three months, mean pain was 5.10 points with minimal treatment and manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both reduced pain by a MD of -0.53 points (95% CI -0.92 to -0.14, I = 43%; 12 trials, 1023 participants). At four weeks to three months, mean disability was 63.8 points with minimal or no treatment and manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both reduced disability by a MD of -5.00 points (95% CI -9.22 to -0.77, I = 63%; 10 trials, 732 participants). At four weeks to three months, mean quality of life was 73.04 points with minimal treatment on a 0 to 100 scale and prescribed exercises reduced quality of life by a MD of -5.58 points (95% CI -10.29 to -0.99; 2 trials, 113 participants). Treatment success was reported by 42% of participants with minimal or no treatment and 57.1% of participants with manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both, RR 1.36 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.93, I = 73%; 6 trials, 770 participants). We are uncertain if manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both results in more withdrawals or adverse events. There were 83/566 participant withdrawals (147 per 1000) from the minimal or no intervention group, and 77/581 (126 per 1000) from the manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both groups, RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.12, I = 0%; 12 trials). Adverse events were mild and transient and included pain, bruising and gastrointestinal events, and no serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events were reported by 19/224 (85 per 1000) in the minimal treatment group and 70/233 (313 per 1000) in the manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both groups, RR 3.69 (95% CI 0.98 to 13.97, I = 72%; 6 trials). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low-certainty evidence from a single trial in people with lateral elbow pain indicates that, compared with placebo, manual therapy may provide a clinically worthwhile benefit in terms of pain and disability at the end of treatment, although the 95% confidence interval also includes both an important improvement and no improvement, and the longer-term outcomes are unknown. Low-certainty evidence from 12 trials indicates that manual therapy and exercise may slightly reduce pain and disability at the end of treatment, but this may not be clinically worthwhile and these benefits are not sustained. While pain after treatment was an adverse event from manual therapy, the number of events was too small to be certain.
背景:在当代临床实践中,手动治疗和规定的运动通常一起或单独提供,用于治疗外侧肘部疼痛的患者。
目的:评估手动治疗、规定的运动或两者对患有外侧肘部疼痛的成年人的益处和危害。
检索方法:我们检索了数据库 CENTRAL、MEDLINE 和 Embase,并在 2024 年 1 月 31 日之前检索了试验注册处,不受语言或发布日期的限制。
选择标准:我们纳入了随机或半随机试验。参与者为患有外侧肘部疼痛的成年人。干预措施为手动治疗、规定的运动或两者。主要比较为安慰剂或最小或无干预。我们还纳入了手动治疗和规定的运动与单独干预或与糖皮质激素注射的比较。排除了单次干预应用的试验或不同类型的手动治疗或规定的运动的比较。
数据收集和分析:两名综述作者独立选择纳入的研究,提取试验特征和数值数据,并使用 GRADE 评估研究的偏倚风险和证据确定性。主要比较是手动治疗、规定的运动或两者与安慰剂治疗的比较,以及与最小或无干预的比较。主要结局是干预结束时的疼痛、残疾、健康相关生活质量、参与者报告的治疗成功、参与者退出、不良事件和严重不良事件。主要终点是疼痛、残疾、健康相关生活质量和参与者报告的治疗成功的干预结束时和不良事件和退出的最终时间点。
主要结果:23 项试验(1612 名参与者)符合我们的纳入标准(平均年龄为 38 至 52 岁,47%为女性,70%为优势手臂受累)。一项试验(23 名参与者)比较了手动治疗与安慰剂手动治疗,12 项试验(1124 名参与者)比较了手动治疗、规定的运动或两者与最小或无干预,6 项试验(228 名参与者)比较了手动治疗和运动与运动单独,一项试验(60 名参与者)比较了添加手动治疗与规定的运动和糖皮质激素注射,四项试验(177 名参与者)评估了添加手动治疗、规定的运动或两者与糖皮质激素注射。21 项无安慰剂对照的试验易受操作和检测偏倚的影响,因为参与者对干预措施未进行盲法。其他偏倚包括选择(9 项试验,39%,包括两项半随机)、失访(8 项试验,35%)和选择性报告(15 项试验,65%)偏倚。我们报告了主要比较的结果。
手动治疗与安慰剂手动治疗:低质量证据,基于一项单臂试验(23 名参与者),并因间接性和不精确性而降低,表明手动治疗可能在治疗的 2 至 3 周后减轻疼痛和肘部残疾。治疗结束时的平均疼痛为 4.1 分(0 至 10 分制),安慰剂组为 2.0 分,MD-2.1 分(95%CI-4.2 至-0.1)。治疗结束时的平均残疾为 40 分(0 至 100 分制),安慰剂组为 15 分,MD-25 分(95%CI-43 至-7)。没有超过治疗结束时间的随访来显示这些效果是否持续,也没有报告其他主要结局。
手动治疗、规定的运动或两者与最小干预:低质量证据表明,手动治疗、规定的运动或两者可能在治疗结束时略微减轻疼痛和残疾,但这些效果并不持久,健康相关生活质量或报告治疗成功的参与者数量可能没有改善或改善很小。我们降低了证据的质量,因为所有试验都存在操作偏倚和检测偏倚的风险增加,以及由于试验中包含的干预措施的多模式性质而存在间接性。在 4 周到 3 个月时,安慰剂组的平均疼痛为 5.10 分,而手动治疗、规定的运动或两者的疼痛减轻了 MD-0.53 分(95%CI-0.92 至-0.14,I=43%;12 项试验,1023 名参与者)。在 4 周到 3 个月时,安慰剂组的平均残疾为 63.8 分,而手动治疗、规定的运动或两者的残疾减轻了 MD-5.00 分(95%CI-9.22 至-0.77,I=63%;10 项试验,732 名参与者)。在 4 周到 3 个月时,安慰剂组的平均健康相关生活质量为 73.04 分(0 至 100 分制),而规定的运动组的生活质量降低了 MD-5.58 分(95%CI-10.29 至-0.99;2 项试验,113 名参与者)。报告最小治疗的参与者中有 42%和报告手动治疗、规定的运动或两者的参与者中有 57.1%报告治疗成功,RR 1.36(95%CI 0.96 至 1.93,I=73%;6 项试验,770 名参与者)。我们不确定手动治疗、规定的运动或两者是否会导致更多的退出或不良事件。最小或无干预组的参与者退出率为 83/566(147/1000),而手动治疗、规定的运动或两者组的参与者退出率为 77/581(126/1000),RR 0.86(95%CI 0.66 至 1.12,I=0%;12 项试验)。不良事件轻微且短暂,包括疼痛、瘀伤和胃肠道事件,没有报告严重不良事件。最小治疗组的不良事件报告率为 19/224(85/1000),而手动治疗、规定的运动或两者组的不良事件报告率为 70/233(313/1000),RR 3.69(95%CI 0.98 至 13.97,I=72%;6 项试验)。
作者结论:来自外侧肘部疼痛患者的单臂试验的低质量证据表明,与安慰剂相比,手动治疗可能在治疗结束时在疼痛和残疾方面提供有临床意义的益处,尽管 95%置信区间也包括重要改善和无改善,且长期结局未知。来自 12 项试验的低质量证据表明,手动治疗和运动可能在治疗结束时略微减轻疼痛和残疾,但这可能没有临床意义,这些益处也不会持续。虽然治疗后的疼痛是手动治疗的不良事件,但事件数量太少,无法确定。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-5-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-5-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-6-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-8-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-2-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-9-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-30
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022-4-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-30