文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

用于膝关节骨关节炎的干细胞注射

Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee.

作者信息

Whittle Samuel L, Johnston Renea V, McDonald Steve, Worthley Daniel, Campbell T Mark, Cyril Sheila, Bapna Tanay, Zhang Jason, Buchbinder Rachelle

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 2;4(4):CD013342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013342.pub2.


DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD013342.pub2
PMID:40169165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11961299/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stem cells are specialised precursor cells that can replace aged or damaged cells and thereby maintain healthy tissue function. Stem cell therapy is increasingly used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, despite the lack of clarity around the mechanism by which stem cell therapy may slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis, and uncertainty regarding its benefits and harms. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of stem cell injections for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. A secondary objective is to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase on 15 September 2023, unrestricted by date or language of publication. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant trial protocols and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or trials using quasi-randomised methods of participant allocation, comparing stem cell injection with placebo injection, no treatment or usual care, glucocorticoid injection, other injections, exercise, drug therapy, surgical interventions, and supplements and complementary therapies in people with knee osteoarthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial characteristics and outcome data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary comparison was stem cell injection compared with placebo injection. The primary time point for pain, function and quality of life was three to six months, and the end of the trial period for participant-reported success, joint structure changes and adverse event outcomes. Major outcomes were pain, function, quality of life, global assessment of success, radiographic joint progression, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We found 25 randomised trials (1341 participants) comparing stem cell injections with placebo injection (eight trials), no treatment or usual care (analgesia, weight loss and exercise) (two trials), glucocorticoid injection (one trial), hyaluronic acid injection (seven trials), platelet-rich plasma injections (two trials), oral acetaminophen (paracetamol) (one trial), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus physical therapy plus hyaluronic acid injection (one trial) and stem cell injection plus intra-articular co-intervention versus co-intervention alone (three trials) in people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Trials were predominantly small, with sample sizes ranging from 6 to 252 participants, with only two trials having more than 100 participants. The average age of participants across trials ranged from 51 to 66 years, and symptom duration varied from one to 10 years. Placebo-controlled trials were largely free from bias, while most trials without a placebo control were susceptible to performance and detection biases. Here, we limit reporting to the main comparison, stem cell injection versus placebo injection. Compared with placebo injection, stem cell injection may slightly improve pain and function up to six months after treatment. Mean pain (0 to 10 scale, 0 no pain) was 4.5 out of 10 points with placebo injection and 1.2 points better (2.5 points better to 0 points better) with stem cell injection (I = 80%; 7 studies, 445 participants). Mean function (0 to 100 scale, 0 best function) was 46.3 points with placebo injection and 14.2 points better (25.3 points better to 3.1 points better) with stem cell injection (I = 82%; 7 studies, 432 participants). We are uncertain whether stem cell injections improve quality of life or increase the number of people who report treatment success compared to placebo injection, because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Mean quality of life was 45.3 points with placebo injection and 22.8 points better (18.0 points worse to 63.7 points better) with stem cell injection (I = 96%; 2 studies, 288 participants) at up to six months follow-up. At the end of follow-up, 89/168 participants (530 per 1000) in the placebo injection group reported treatment success compared with 126/180 participants (683 per 1000) in the stem cell injection group (risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53; I = 0%; 4 trials, 348 participants). We downgraded the evidence to low certainty for pain and function due to indirectness (as the source, method of preparation and dose of stem cells varied across studies), and suspected publication bias (up to three larger RCTs have been conducted but withdrawn prior to reporting of results). For quality of life and treatment success, we further downgraded the evidence to very low certainty due to imprecision in addition to indirectness and suspected publication bias. We are uncertain of the potential harms associated with stem cell injection, as there were very low event rates for serious adverse events. At the end of follow-up, 5/219 participants (23 per 1000) in the placebo injection group experienced serious adverse events compared with 4/242 participants (16 per 1000) in the stem cell injection group (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.64; I = 0%; 7 trials, 461 participants) and there were no reported withdrawals due to adverse events. We downgraded the evidence to very low certainty due to indirectness, suspected publication bias and imprecision. Radiographic progression was not assessed in any of the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo injections and based upon low-certainty evidence, stem cell injections for people with knee osteoarthritis may slightly improve pain and function. We are uncertain of the effects of stem cell injections on quality of life or the number who report treatment success. Although the putative benefits of stem cell therapies for osteoarthritis include potential regenerative effects on damaged tissues, particularly articular cartilage, we remain uncertain of the effect of stem cell injections on structural progression in the knee (measured by radiographic appearance). There is also uncertainty regarding the safety of stem cell injections. Serious adverse events were infrequently reported, although all invasive joint procedures (including injections) carry a small risk of septic arthritis. The risk of other important harms, including potential concerns related to the use of a therapy with the theoretical capacity to promote cell growth, or to the use of allogeneic cells, remains unknown.

摘要

背景:干细胞是一种特殊的前体细胞,能够替代衰老或受损的细胞,从而维持健康的组织功能。尽管干细胞疗法减缓骨关节炎疾病进展的机制尚不清楚,其益处和危害也不确定,但干细胞疗法越来越多地被用于治疗膝关节骨关节炎。 目的:评估干细胞注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎患者的益处和危害。次要目的是采用实时系统评价方法,使证据保持时效性。 检索方法:我们于2023年9月15日检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE和Embase,不受出版日期或语言限制。我们还检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP),以获取相关试验方案和正在进行的试验。 入选标准:我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),或采用准随机方法进行参与者分配的试验,比较干细胞注射与安慰剂注射、不治疗或常规护理、糖皮质激素注射、其他注射、运动、药物治疗、手术干预以及补充剂和辅助疗法,用于膝关节骨关节炎患者。 数据收集与分析:两名综述作者选择纳入的研究,提取试验特征和结局数据,评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。主要比较是干细胞注射与安慰剂注射。疼痛、功能和生活质量的主要时间点是三到六个月,参与者报告的成功、关节结构变化和不良事件结局的主要时间点是试验期结束时。主要结局包括疼痛、功能、生活质量、成功的总体评估、影像学关节进展、因不良事件退出和严重不良事件。 主要结果:我们发现25项随机试验(1341名参与者),比较了干细胞注射与安慰剂注射(8项试验)、不治疗或常规护理(镇痛、减肥和运动)(2项试验)、糖皮质激素注射(1项试验)、透明质酸注射(7项试验)、富血小板血浆注射(2项试验)、口服对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)(1项试验)、非甾体抗炎药加物理治疗加透明质酸注射(1项试验)以及干细胞注射加关节内联合干预与单独联合干预(3项试验),用于膝关节骨关节炎患者。试验大多规模较小,样本量从6名到252名参与者不等,只有两项试验的参与者超过100名。各试验中参与者的平均年龄在51岁至66岁之间,症状持续时间从1年到10年不等。安慰剂对照试验在很大程度上没有偏倚,而大多数没有安慰剂对照的试验容易出现实施和检测偏倚。在此,我们将报告限制在主要比较,即干细胞注射与安慰剂注射。与安慰剂注射相比,干细胞注射在治疗后长达六个月可能会轻微改善疼痛和功能。安慰剂注射组的平均疼痛(0至10分,0分为无疼痛)为10分中的4.5分,干细胞注射组的疼痛改善1.2分(改善2.5分至改善0分)(I² = 80%;7项研究,445名参与者)。安慰剂注射组的平均功能(0至100分,0分为最佳功能)为46.3分,干细胞注射组的功能改善14.2分(改善25.3分至改善3.1分)(I² = 82%;7项研究,432名参与者)。我们不确定与安慰剂注射相比,干细胞注射是否能改善生活质量或增加报告治疗成功的人数,因为证据的确定性非常低。在长达六个月的随访中,安慰剂注射组的平均生活质量为45.3分,干细胞注射组的生活质量改善22.8分(恶化18.0分至改善63.7分)(I² = 96%;2项研究,288名参与者)。在随访结束时,安慰剂注射组的168名参与者中有89名(每1000名中有530名)报告治疗成功,而干细胞注射组的180名参与者中有126名(每1000名中有683名)报告治疗成功(风险比(RR)1.29,95%置信区间1.10至1.53;I² = 0%;4项研究,348名参与者)。由于间接性(因为不同研究中干细胞的来源、制备方法和剂量不同)以及疑似发表偏倚(已进行了多达三项更大的RCT,但在结果报告前撤回),我们将疼痛和功能的证据降级为低确定性。对于生活质量和治疗成功,除了间接性和疑似发表偏倚外,由于不精确性,我们进一步将证据降级为非常低的确定性。我们不确定与干细胞注射相关的潜在危害,因为严重不良事件的发生率非常低。在随访结束时,安慰剂注射组的219名参与者中有5名(每1000名中有23名)发生严重不良事件,而干细胞注射组的242名参与者中有4名(每1000名中有16名)发生严重不良事件(RR 0.72,95%置信区间0.20至2.64;I² = 0%;7项研究,461名参与者),且没有因不良事件而退出的报告。由于间接性、疑似发表偏倚和不精确性,我们将证据降级为非常低的确定性。纳入的任何研究均未评估影像学进展。 作者结论:与安慰剂注射相比,基于低确定性证据,干细胞注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎患者可能会轻微改善疼痛和功能。我们不确定干细胞注射对生活质量或报告治疗成功人数的影响。尽管干细胞疗法对骨关节炎的假定益处包括对受损组织,特别是关节软骨的潜在再生作用,但我们仍不确定干细胞注射对膝关节结构进展(通过影像学表现测量)的影响。干细胞注射的安全性也存在不确定性。严重不良事件报告很少,尽管所有侵入性关节手术(包括注射)都有小概率发生感染性关节炎。其他重要危害的风险,包括与使用具有促进细胞生长理论能力的疗法相关的潜在问题,或与使用同种异体细胞相关的潜在问题,仍然未知。

相似文献

[1]
Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-2

[2]
Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease (osteoarthritis including degenerative meniscal tears).

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-3

[3]
Manual therapy and exercise for lateral elbow pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-5-28

[4]
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-2-20

[5]
Cryotherapy following total knee replacement.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-9-14

[6]
Methotrexate for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-2-9

[7]
Autologous blood and platelet-rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-30

[8]
Exercise for patellar tendinopathy.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-5-27

[9]
Image-guided glucocorticoid injection versus injection without image guidance for shoulder pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-8-26

[10]
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations Related to Regenerative Medicine.

HSS J. 2025-8-30

[2]
The global burden of osteoarthritis hand: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2021.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-7-31

[3]
The Use of MSCs, iPSCs, and EVs in the Repair of Human MSK Tissues: Is Ultimate Success Dependent on Developing Excellent Implant Materials as Well as Creating an Optimal Environment for Implantation? What Is the Rationale for These Choices?

Int J Mol Sci. 2025-6-28

本文引用的文献

[1]
Protecting the regenerative environment: selecting the optimal delivery vehicle for cartilage repair-a narrative review.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024-1-25

[2]
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of the Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Am J Sports Med. 2023-7

[3]
Cartilage regeneration and inflammation modulation in knee osteoarthritis following injection of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: a phase II, triple-blinded, placebo controlled, randomized trial.

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023-6-14

[4]
A systematic review, umbrella review, and quality assessment on clinical translation of stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis: Are we there yet?

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023-4-15

[5]
Outcome of Intra-articular Injection of Total Stromal Cells and Platelet-Rich Plasma in Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cureus. 2023-2-3

[6]
Clinical phase I/II trial of SVF therapy for cartilage regeneration: A cellular therapy with novel 3D MRI imaging for evaluating chondral defect of knee osteoarthritis.

Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023-1-19

[7]
Intra-articular injection choice for osteoarthritis: making sense of cell source-an updated systematic review and dual network meta-analysis.

Arthritis Res Ther. 2022-11-28

[8]
Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ. 2022-7-6

[9]
The Effectiveness and Safety of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 28 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Stem Cells Int. 2022-10-12

[10]
Randomized control trial of mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in patients with knee osteoarthritis - A Hong Kong pilot study.

J Orthop Translat. 2022-10-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索