• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估维基百科和百度百科中关于肠易激综合征信息的医学信息:比较研究。

Assessment of medical information on irritable bowel syndrome information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: comparative study.

机构信息

General Practice ward/ International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 May 24;12:e17264. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17264. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.17264
PMID:38803580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11129691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) with heterogeneous clinical presentations. There are no clear testing parameters for its diagnosis, and the complex pathophysiology of IBS and the limited time that doctors have to spend with patients makes it difficult to adequately educate patients in the outpatient setting. An increased awareness of IBS means that patients are more likely to self-diagnose and self-manage IBS based on their own symptoms. These factors may make patients more likely to turn to Internet resources. Wikipedia is the most popular online encyclopedia among English-speaking users, with numerous validations. However, in Mandarin-speaking regions, the Baidu Encyclopedia is most commonly used. There have been no studies on the reliability, readability, and objectivity of IBS information on the two sites. This is an urgent issue as these platforms are accessed by approximately 1.45 billion people.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the IBS content on Wikipedia (in English) and Baidu Baike (in Chinese), two online encyclopedias, in terms of reliability, readability, and objectivity.

METHODS

The Baidu Encyclopedia (in Chinese) and Wikipedia (in English) were evaluated based on the Rome IV IBS definitions and diagnoses. All possible synonyms and derivatives for IBS and IBS-related FGIDs were screened and identified. Two gastroenterology experts evaluated the scores of articles for both sites using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association scoring system (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS).

RESULTS

Wikipedia scored higher overall with DISCERN ( < .0001), JAMA ( < .0001) and GQS ( < .05) than the Baidu Encyclopedia. Specifically, Wikipedia scored higher in DISCERN Section 1 ( < .0001), DISCERN Section 2 ( < .01), DISCERN Section 3 ( < .001), and the General DISCERN score ( < .0001) than the Baidu Encyclopedia. Both sites had low DISCERN Section 2 scores ( = .18). Wikipedia also had a larger percentage of high quality scores in total DISCERN, DISCERN Section 1, and DISCERN Section 3 ( < .0001,  < .0001,  < .0004, respectively, based on the above 3 (60%) rule).

CONCLUSIONS

Wikipedia provides more reliable, higher quality, and more objective IBS-related health information than the Baidu Encyclopedia. However, there should be improvements in the information quality for both sites. Medical professionals and institutions should collaborate with these online platforms to offer better health information for IBS.

摘要

背景

肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种功能性胃肠道疾病(FGID),具有异质性的临床表现。目前尚无明确的诊断测试参数,而 IBS 的复杂病理生理学以及医生与患者相处的时间有限,使得医生难以在门诊环境中充分教育患者。人们对 IBS 的认识不断提高,这意味着患者更有可能根据自己的症状自我诊断和自我管理 IBS。这些因素可能使患者更倾向于转向互联网资源。维基百科是英语使用者中最受欢迎的在线百科全书,具有众多验证。然而,在华语地区,最常使用的是百度百科。目前还没有关于这两个网站上 IBS 信息的可靠性、可读性和客观性的研究。由于这两个平台大约有 14.5 亿人访问,因此这是一个紧迫的问题。

目的

我们比较了维基百科(英文版)和百度百科(中文版)这两个在线百科全书在可靠性、可读性和客观性方面的 IBS 内容。

方法

根据罗马 IV IBS 定义和诊断标准,评估了百度百科(中文版)和维基百科(英文版)。筛选并确定了 IBS 和 IBS 相关 FGID 的所有可能同义词和派生词。两位胃肠病学专家使用 DISCERN 工具、《美国医学会杂志》评分系统(JAMA)和全球质量评分(GQS)对两个网站的文章评分进行评估。

结果

维基百科在 DISCERN(<0.0001)、JAMA(<0.0001)和 GQS(<0.05)方面的总体得分均高于百度百科。具体而言,维基百科在 DISCERN 第 1 节(<0.0001)、DISCERN 第 2 节(<0.01)、DISCERN 第 3 节(<0.001)和一般 DISCERN 评分(<0.0001)方面的得分均高于百度百科。两个网站的 DISCERN 第 2 节得分均较低(=0.18)。维基百科在总 DISCERN、DISCERN 第 1 节和 DISCERN 第 3 节的高质量评分比例也更大(<0.0001、<0.0001、<0.0004,分别基于上述 3 个(60%)规则)。

结论

与百度百科相比,维基百科提供了更可靠、更高质量、更客观的 IBS 相关健康信息。然而,这两个网站的信息质量都应该有所提高。医学专业人员和机构应与这些在线平台合作,为 IBS 提供更好的健康信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/7d5918f3015e/peerj-12-17264-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/788f2a854be2/peerj-12-17264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/d034e025f300/peerj-12-17264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/3e240c89b0cb/peerj-12-17264-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/27c74d666de0/peerj-12-17264-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/7d5918f3015e/peerj-12-17264-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/788f2a854be2/peerj-12-17264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/d034e025f300/peerj-12-17264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/3e240c89b0cb/peerj-12-17264-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/27c74d666de0/peerj-12-17264-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2869/11129691/7d5918f3015e/peerj-12-17264-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of medical information on irritable bowel syndrome information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: comparative study.评估维基百科和百度百科中关于肠易激综合征信息的医学信息:比较研究。
PeerJ. 2024 May 24;12:e17264. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17264. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of Medical Information on Male Sexual Dysfunction on Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Comparative Study.评价百度百科和维基百科上男性性功能障碍医学信息:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e37339. doi: 10.2196/37339.
3
Evaluation of the Liver Disease Information in Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Longitudinal Study.百度百科和维基百科中的肝病信息评估:纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 18;23(1):e17680. doi: 10.2196/17680.
4
Assessment of the digestive system malignancy information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: a longitudinal study.维基百科和百度百科中消化系统恶性肿瘤信息的评估:一项纵向研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Oct;10(20):1112. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4435.
5
Readability and quality of Wikipedia articles on pelvic floor disorders.盆腔底障碍相关维基百科文章的可读性和质量。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3249-3258. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04776-0. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles.英文维基百科解剖学文章的质量和可读性。
Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Jul;13(4):475-487. doi: 10.1002/ase.1910. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.英文-维基百科上的男性和女性医学内容质量:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e47562. doi: 10.2196/47562.
8
Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?评价维基百科上的胃肠病学和肝脏病学文章:它们是否适合作为医学生的学习资源?
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;26(2):155-63. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000003.
9
Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?维基百科中心血管词条的准确性和可读性:它们是医学生可靠的学习资源吗?
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e008187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008187.
10
Can pharmacy students use Wikipedia as a learning resource? Critical assessment of articles on chemotherapeutic drugs.药学专业学生能否将维基百科作为学习资源?对化疗药物相关文章的批判性评估。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2023 Jun 1;47(2):333-345. doi: 10.1152/advan.00212.2022. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19, a far cry from the influenza.新冠病毒肺炎与流感截然不同。
Precis Clin Med. 2020 Jun;3(2):100-103. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa015. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
An evaluation of mathematical models for the outbreak of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情数学模型评估
Precis Clin Med. 2020 Jun;3(2):85-93. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa016. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Evaluation of Medical Information on Male Sexual Dysfunction on Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Comparative Study.评价百度百科和维基百科上男性性功能障碍医学信息:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e37339. doi: 10.2196/37339.
4
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia.英国胃肠病学会功能性消化不良管理指南。
Gut. 2022 Sep;71(9):1697-1723. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327737. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Enterogenous Microbiotic Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease and Intestinal Tuberculosis.肠源微生物标志物在克罗恩病和肠结核鉴别诊断中的应用。
Front Immunol. 2022 Mar 16;13:820891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.820891. eCollection 2022.
6
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
7
ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.ACG 临床指南:肠易激综合征的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 1;116(1):17-44. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001036.
8
Irritable bowel syndrome.肠易激综合征。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1675-1688. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31548-8. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
Functional gastrointestinal disorders: advances in understanding and management.功能性胃肠病:理解和治疗方面的进展。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1664-1674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32115-2. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Impact of the Internet on Medical Decisions of Chinese Adults: Longitudinal Data Analysis.互联网对中国成年人医疗决策的影响:纵向数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 3;22(9):e18481. doi: 10.2196/18481.