Local Action and Health Equity Group (ALES Group), Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Gandia Health Department, Gandia, Spain.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1292032. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292032. eCollection 2024.
The physical, social, and economic characteristics of neighborhoods and municipalities determine the health of their residents, shaping their behaviors and choices regarding health and well-being. Addressing local environmental inequalities requires an intersectoral, participatory, and equity-focused approach. Community participation plays a vital role by providing deeper insights into local contexts, integrating community knowledge and values into processes, and promoting healthier, fairer, and more equitable actions. In recent years, various tools have been developed to assess places and transform them into health-promoting settings. One such tool, the Place Standard Tool (PST), facilitates discussions on Social Determinants of Health grouped into 14 themes, serving as a starting point for local health interventions. In this study, that took place between August 2019 and February 2020, we described the resident's perceptions of two municipalities in the Valencian Community, Spain, using the validated Spanish version of the PST. A mixed-method convergent-parallel design was used to gain a holistic insight into residents' experiences concerning their physical, economic, and social environment. A total of 356 individuals from both municipalities participated in the study through discussion groups, structured interviews, and online survey. Descriptive analysis of the individual questionnaire answers was conducted, and differences between municipalities were explored. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on structured interviews and discussion groups. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to facilitate their comparison and identify areas of convergence or divergence in the findings. Overall, rural areas received more favorable evaluations compared to urban ones. Public Transport as well as Work and Local Economy were consistently rated the lowest across all groups and contexts, while Identity and Belonging received the highest ratings. In the urban area, additional negative ratings were observed for Traffic and Parking, Housing and Community, and Care and Maintenance. Conversely, Identity and Belonging, Natural Spaces, Streets and Spaces, Social Interaction, and Services emerged as the highest-rated themes overall. In the rural context, positive evaluations were given to Walking or Cycling, Traffic and Parking, Housing and Community, and Influence and Sense of Control. Significant differences ( < 0.01) between urban and rural settings were observed in dimensions related to mobility, spaces, housing, social interaction, and identity and belonging. Our study illustrated the capacity of the PST to identifying aspects within local settings that influence health, revealing both positive and challenging factors. Successful implementation requires appropriate territorial delineation, support from local authorities, and effective management of expectations. Furthermore, the tool facilitated community participation in decision-making about local environments, promoting equity by connecting institutional processes with citizen needs.
社区和城市的物理、社会和经济特征决定了其居民的健康状况,影响着他们在健康和福祉方面的行为和选择。解决地方环境不平等问题需要采取跨部门、参与式和注重公平的方法。社区参与通过深入了解地方情况、将社区知识和价值观融入到各个流程中,以及促进更健康、更公平和更平等的行动,发挥了至关重要的作用。近年来,已经开发出各种工具来评估场所并将其转变为促进健康的环境。其中一个工具是地点标准工具 (PST),它促进了对社会决定因素健康的讨论,这些因素分为 14 个主题,是进行地方卫生干预的起点。在这项研究中,我们于 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,使用经过验证的西班牙语版 PST,描述了西班牙巴伦西亚社区两个城市的居民感知。采用混合方法的汇聚平行设计,从整体上了解居民对其物质、经济和社会环境的体验。两个城市共有 356 人通过讨论小组、结构化访谈和在线调查参与了这项研究。对个人问卷答案进行了描述性分析,并探讨了城市之间的差异。对结构化访谈和讨论小组进行了定性主题分析。将定量和定性数据进行整合,以促进它们的比较,并确定调查结果中趋同或分歧的领域。总的来说,农村地区的评价比城市地区更有利。公共交通以及工作和当地经济在所有群体和背景下的评价一直最低,而身份和归属感的评价最高。在城市地区,交通和停车、住房和社区以及护理和维护方面还观察到了更多的负面评价。相反,身份和归属感、自然空间、街道和空间、社会互动以及服务成为整体评价最高的主题。在农村地区,对步行或骑自行车、交通和停车、住房和社区以及影响力和控制感的评价较为积极。在与流动性、空间、住房、社会互动和身份与归属感相关的维度上,城乡之间存在显著差异(<0.01)。我们的研究说明了 PST 能够识别影响健康的地方环境中的各个方面,揭示了积极和具有挑战性的因素。成功实施需要适当的领土划定、地方当局的支持以及对预期的有效管理。此外,该工具还促进了社区参与地方环境的决策,通过将机构流程与公民需求联系起来,促进了公平。