• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合认知表示与语言意义形式结构之间的鸿沟。

Bridging the Chasm Between Cognitive Representations and Formal Structures of Linguistic Meanings.

机构信息

Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2024 May;48(5):e13456. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13456.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.13456
PMID:38804002
Abstract

This paper aims to show that properties of cognitive/conceptual representations and formal-logical structures of linguistic meaning can be inter-translated, recast, transformed into one another, and so united together, even though cognitive/conceptual representations and formal-logical structures of linguistic meaning are apparently distinct in ontology and divergent in their form or character. While cognitive/conceptual representations are ultimately rooted in sensory-motor systems, formal-logical structures of linguistic meaning are abstractions detached from and independent of the actualized world. This paper sketches out the foundations of how representations of linguistic meaning in terms of cognitive/conceptual structures in Cognitive/Conceptual Semantics can be unified with those in terms of formal-logical structures in Formal Semantics. This is done by recasting cognitive/conceptual representations in terms of formal-logical structures of linguistic meaning and re-encoding formal-logical structures of linguistic meaning in terms of cognitive/conceptual representations. Then, these two types of semantic representations, thus shown representationally equivalent, will be related to a series of derivations across levels in neuronal networks and dynamics. The general discussion on unifying cognitive/conceptual representations of linguistic meaning with formal-logical structures is contextualized within the broader context of theorizing in cognitive science.

摘要

本文旨在表明,认知/概念表示和语言意义的形式逻辑结构的属性可以相互翻译、改写、转换,并结合在一起,尽管认知/概念表示和语言意义的形式逻辑结构在本体论上明显不同,在形式或特征上也存在差异。虽然认知/概念表示最终植根于感觉运动系统,但语言意义的形式逻辑结构是与实现世界脱离和独立的抽象。本文概述了如何将认知/概念语义学中的语言意义表示统一到形式语义学中的形式逻辑结构中。这是通过将认知/概念表示改写为语言意义的形式逻辑结构,并将语言意义的形式逻辑结构重新编码为认知/概念表示来实现的。然后,这两种类型的语义表示在表示上被证明是等价的,将与神经网络和动力学中的一系列跨层次推导相关联。关于将语言意义的认知/概念表示与形式逻辑结构统一的一般讨论,是在认知科学理论化的更广泛背景下进行的。

相似文献

1
Bridging the Chasm Between Cognitive Representations and Formal Structures of Linguistic Meanings.弥合认知表示与语言意义形式结构之间的鸿沟。
Cogn Sci. 2024 May;48(5):e13456. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13456.
2
The Puzzling Chasm Between Cognitive Representations and Formal Structures of Linguistic Meanings.认知表现与语言意义形式结构之间的费解鸿沟。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;46(9):e13200. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13200.
3
Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.迈向语言意义的统一理论。
Commun Integr Biol. 2023 Apr 26;16(1):2200666. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2023.2200666. eCollection 2023.
4
Design Features for Linguistically-Mediated Meaning Construction: The Relative Roles of the Linguistic and Conceptual Systems in Subserving the Ideational Function of Language.语言介导意义构建的设计特征:语言系统和概念系统在服务语言概念功能中的相对作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00156. eCollection 2016.
5
Linguistic meanings as cognitive instructions.语言意义作为认知指令。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Sep;1500(1):134-144. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14618. Epub 2021 May 28.
6
Keeping quantifier meaning in mind: Connecting semantics, cognition, and pragmatics.牢记量词的含义:连接语义学、认知与语用学。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Aug;144:101584. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101584. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
7
Embodied experience and linguistic meaning.具身经验与语言意义。
Brain Lang. 2003 Jan;84(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00517-5.
8
Embodiment and language.体现与语言。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):e1649. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1649. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
Grounded Cognition Entails Linguistic Relativity: Response to Commentators.扎根认知需要语言相对论:对评论者的回应。
Top Cogn Sci. 2023 Oct;15(4):698-708. doi: 10.1111/tops.12687. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
10
Grounded Cognition Entails Linguistic Relativity: A Neglected Implication of a Major Semantic Theory.具身认知蕴含语言相对性:一种主要语义理论被忽视的含义。
Top Cogn Sci. 2023 Oct;15(4):615-647. doi: 10.1111/tops.12628. Epub 2022 Oct 13.