• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

"政治与政策之争":美国污名化与过量预防中心决策的定性洞察。

"Politics Versus Policy": Qualitative Insights on Stigma and Overdose Prevention Center Policymaking in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Oct;45(4):682-689. doi: 10.1177/29767342241253663. Epub 2024 May 28.

DOI:10.1177/29767342241253663
PMID:38804608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11458346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Federal, state, and municipal governments in the United States have been reluctant to authorize overdose prevention centers (OPCs), which are evidence-based approaches for preventing overdose deaths and blood-borne pathogen transmission.

METHODS

From July 2022 to February 2023, we explored how stigma manifests in OPC policymaking by conducting in-depth interviews with 17 advocates, legislators, service providers, and researchers involved with OPC advocacy and policymaking in Rhode Island, California, Pennsylvania, and New York.

RESULTS

We found that although jurisdictions differed in their OPC policymaking experiences, stigma manifested throughout the process, from planning to authorization. Participants described OPCs as a tool for destigmatizing overdose and substance use, yet confronted institutionalized stigma and discriminatory attitudes toward people who use drugs (PWUD) and harm reduction from multiple sources (eg, politicians, media, and members of the public). Opposition toward OPCs and harm reduction approaches more broadly intersected with public discourse on crime, homelessness, and public disorder. Employed stigma-mitigation strategies included humanizing PWUD, publicizing the benefits of OPCs to the wider community, and strategically engaging media.

CONCLUSION

These findings illustrate the importance of understanding stigma at different stages of the policymaking process to better facilitate authorization and eventual implementation of OPCs in the United States.

摘要

背景

美国的联邦、州和市政府一直不愿意批准过量预防中心 (OPC),而 OPC 是预防过量死亡和血源性病原体传播的循证方法。

方法

从 2022 年 7 月到 2023 年 2 月,我们通过对罗德岛、加利福尼亚州、宾夕法尼亚州和纽约参与 OPC 倡导和政策制定的 17 名倡导者、立法者、服务提供者和研究人员进行深入访谈,探讨了污名化如何在 OPC 政策制定中表现出来。

结果

我们发现,尽管司法管辖区在 OPC 政策制定方面的经验不同,但污名化在整个过程中都表现出来,从规划到授权。参与者将 OPC 描述为消除对过量用药和药物使用的污名化的工具,但面临着来自多个来源(如政治家、媒体和公众成员)的针对吸毒者 (PWUD) 和减少伤害的制度化污名化和歧视性态度。反对 OPC 和更广泛的减少伤害方法与关于犯罪、无家可归和公共秩序的公众讨论相交织。采用的污名化缓解策略包括将 PWUD 人性化、向更广泛的社区宣传 OPC 的好处以及有策略地与媒体接触。

结论

这些发现说明了在政策制定过程的不同阶段了解污名化的重要性,以更好地促进美国 OPC 的授权和最终实施。

相似文献

1
"Politics Versus Policy": Qualitative Insights on Stigma and Overdose Prevention Center Policymaking in the United States."政治与政策之争":美国污名化与过量预防中心决策的定性洞察。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Oct;45(4):682-689. doi: 10.1177/29767342241253663. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Association between willingness to use an overdose prevention center and probation or parole status among people who use drugs in Rhode Island.罗得岛使用毒品者愿意使用过量预防中心与缓刑或假释状况之间的关联。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 29;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00969-0.
3
Study assessing the effectiveness of overdose prevention centers through research (SAFER): an overview of the study protocol.通过研究评估过量用药预防中心有效性的研究(SAFER):研究方案概述
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 13;22(Suppl 1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01211-1.
4
Four decades of overdose prevention centres: lessons for the future from a realist review.四十年的过量用药预防中心:基于实证主义综述对未来的启示
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Mar 20;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01178-z.
5
In Support of Overdose Prevention Centers: Position Statement of AMERSA, Inc (Association for Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Substance Use and Addiction).支持过量预防中心:AMERSA 公司(物质使用和成瘾的多学科教育和研究协会)的立场声明。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Jul;45(3):328-336. doi: 10.1177/29767342241252590. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
"Make yourself un-NIMBY-able": stakeholder perspectives on strategies to mobilize public and political support for overdose prevention centers in the United States of America.“让自己不被视为邻避者”:利益相关者对在美国动员公众和政治支持阿片类药物过量预防中心的策略的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 15;21(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00955-6.
9
Community views on mass drug administration for filariasis: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对丝虫病大规模药物治疗的看法:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 17;2(2):CD013638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013638.pub2.
10
Worldwide Prevalence and Trends in Unintentional Drug Overdose: A Systematic Review of the Literature.全球意外药物过量的患病率及趋势:文献系统综述
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2373. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302843a.

引用本文的文献

1
The mindful resiliency in recovery model: empowering the transcendence of stigma.康复模型中的正念复原力:增强对污名的超越。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 25;15:1460329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1460329. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
"Make yourself un-NIMBY-able": stakeholder perspectives on strategies to mobilize public and political support for overdose prevention centers in the United States of America.“让自己不被视为邻避者”:利益相关者对在美国动员公众和政治支持阿片类药物过量预防中心的策略的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 15;21(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00955-6.
2
Evaluating oxygen monitoring and administration during overdose responses at a sanctioned overdose prevention site in San Francisco, California: A mixed-methods study.评估加利福尼亚州旧金山经许可的过量预防场所过量反应期间的氧气监测和管理:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Nov;121:104165. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104165. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
The Future of the United States Overdose Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities.美国阿片类药物滥用危机的未来:挑战与机遇。
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):478-506. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12602. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
4
Overdose Prevention Centers: An Essential Strategy to Address the Overdose Crisis.过量用药预防中心:应对过量用药危机的一项重要策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222153. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22153.
5
First 2 Months of Operation at First Publicly Recognized Overdose Prevention Centers in US.美国首批公开认可的过量预防中心开业头两个月的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22149.
6
NIMBYism and Harm Reduction Programs: Results from Baltimore City.邻避主义与减少伤害计划:巴尔的摩市的结果
J Urban Health. 2022 Aug;99(4):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00641-7. Epub 2022 May 31.
7
The Impact of Stigma on People with Opioid Use Disorder, Opioid Treatment, and Policy.污名对阿片类药物使用障碍患者、阿片类药物治疗及政策的影响
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2022 Jan 25;13:1-12. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S304566. eCollection 2022.
8
Using Positive Empathy Interventions to Reduce Stigma Toward People Who Inject Drugs.运用积极共情干预措施减少对注射吸毒者的污名化。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 9;12:616729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616729. eCollection 2021.
9
Situating the Continuum of Overdose Risk in the Social Determinants of Health: A New Conceptual Framework.将药物过量风险的连续体置于健康的社会决定因素中:一个新概念框架。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):700-746. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12470. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Notes from the Field: Outbreak of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Among Persons Who Inject Drugs - Cabell County, West Virginia, 2018-2019.现场记录:西弗吉尼亚州卡贝尔县2018 - 2019年注射吸毒者中人类免疫缺陷病毒感染暴发
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 24;69(16):499-500. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6916a2.