Suppr超能文献

支气管肺发育不良学龄儿童家庭肺功能测定和振荡法测量的比较。

Comparison of home-based spirometry and oscillometry measurements in school-age children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Biostatistics and Research Design Center, Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Oct;59(10):2589-2596. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27072. Epub 2024 May 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study compares home-based oscillometry and spirometry for characterizing respiratory system disease in school-aged children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in clinical research. We hypothesized higher rates of successful completion and abnormal cases identified through oscillometry, with correlations between device measurements.

METHODS

Participants 6-12 years old with BPD in the ongoing Air Quality, Environment and Respiratory Outcomes in BPD (AERO-BPD) study performed oscillometry followed by spirometry at two separate home visits. Parameters measured included airway resistance at 5 Hz(R), resistance from 5 to 19 Hz(R), resonance frequency(F), reactance at 5 Hz(X), area under the curve between F and X(AX), forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV), forced vital capacity(FVC), and FEV/FVC. Descriptive statistics identified the proportion of successful tests, correlation in measurements, and rate of lung disease for each device.

RESULTS

Among 76 subjects with 120 paired observations, 95% and 71% of participants successfully performed oscillometry and spirometry, respectively, at home visit one. 98% and 77% successfully performed oscillometry and spirometry, respectively, at home visit two. Odds ratios favored oscillometry (range 5.31-10.13, p < 0.01). FEV correlated with AX (correlation coefficient r = -0.27, p = 0.03); FEV/FVC with AX (r = -0.32, p = 0.02); and FEV/FVC with R (r = -0.37, p = 0.01). AX exhibited the highest prevalence of abnormality at 25%; other oscillometry parameters ranged from 5%-22%. Forty-five to sixty-four percent of participants had abnormal spirometry. Oscillometry assessments had significantly lower odds of capturing lung disease (odds ratios 0.07-0.24, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

School-aged children with BPD demonstrated higher success rates in field-based oscillometry than spirometry. Spirometry exhibited higher rates of abnormality than oscillometry. Moderate correlation exists between device measurements.

摘要

介绍

本研究比较了家庭呼吸震荡测量法和肺功能检测法在支气管肺发育不良(BPD)患儿中的应用,旨在评估这两种方法在儿童呼吸系统疾病中的应用价值。我们假设呼吸震荡测量法的完成率更高,且能检测出更多的异常情况,并评估两种设备检测结果之间的相关性。

方法

在正在进行的“空气质量、环境和 BPD 呼吸结局(AERO-BPD)”研究中,纳入 6-12 岁的 BPD 患儿,在两次家庭访视中分别进行呼吸震荡测量法和肺功能检测法。所测量的参数包括气道阻力(5Hz,R)、5-19Hz 之间的阻力(R)、共振频率(F)、5Hz 时的电抗(X)、F 与 X 之间的曲线下面积(AX)、1 秒用力呼气量(FEV)、用力肺活量(FVC)和 FEV/FVC。通过描述性统计分析,确定每种设备的检测成功率、测量结果的相关性和肺部疾病的发生率。

结果

在 76 名患儿的 120 次配对观察中,95%和 71%的患儿分别在第一次家庭访视中成功完成了呼吸震荡测量法和肺功能检测法,98%和 77%的患儿分别在第二次家庭访视中成功完成了呼吸震荡测量法和肺功能检测法。与肺功能检测法相比,呼吸震荡测量法的优势比(OR)范围为 5.31-10.13,p 值均<0.01)。FEV 与 AX 呈负相关(相关系数 r = -0.27,p = 0.03);FEV/FVC 与 AX 呈负相关(r = -0.32,p = 0.02);FEV/FVC 与 R 呈负相关(r = -0.37,p = 0.01)。AX 的异常率最高,为 25%;其他呼吸震荡测量法参数的异常率范围为 5%-22%。45%-64%的患儿存在肺功能异常。呼吸震荡测量法评估肺部疾病的优势比显著降低(OR 0.07-0.24,p<0.0001)。

结论

与肺功能检测法相比,支气管肺发育不良患儿在家庭中进行呼吸震荡测量法的成功率更高。肺功能检测法的异常率高于呼吸震荡测量法。两种设备检测结果之间存在中度相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验