• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区为基础的以人为本的整合照护 (PIC) 网络以实现健康老龄化就地安置:范围综述方案。

Community-based person-centred integrated care (PIC) networks for healthy ageing in place: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK

Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 28;14(5):e083077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083077.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083077
PMID:38806435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11138266/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The economic case for preventive care delivered in or near citizens' homes is strong, and there is growing evidence of the role of local-level support in supporting people's health and well-being as they age. However, effective and consistent delivery of person-centred integrated care (PIC) at the community level remains elusive. Previous systematic reviews have focused on specific processes such as case management, but none have focused on the operational delivery of community-based care networks. In this study, we aim to identify what practice-based models of PIC networks exist at the local/neighbourhood level and what evidence is available as to their effectiveness for healthy ageing in place.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will undertake a scoping review following the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and updated guidance by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Peer-reviewed sources will be identified through searches of seven databases, and relevant grey literature will be identified through websites of policy and voluntary sector organisations focused on integrated care and/or healthy ageing. Data from included studies will be extracted for relevance to the research questions, including aims and anticipated outcomes of network models, financial and management structures of networks, and evidence of evaluation. Summary tables and narrative comparisons of key PIC network features across settings will be presented.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As no primary data will be collected, ethical approval is not required to conduct this scoping review. In addition to publication as a peer-reviewed article, the results of this review will be summarised as shorter discussion papers for use in follow-up research.

摘要

简介

在公民家中或附近提供预防保健的经济效益是巨大的,并且越来越多的证据表明,在人们随着年龄的增长而保持健康和幸福方面,地方一级的支持发挥着重要作用。然而,在社区一级有效和持续地提供以患者为中心的综合护理(PIC)仍然难以实现。以前的系统评价集中在特定的过程,如病例管理,但没有一个集中在基于社区的护理网络的运营交付上。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定在地方/邻里一级存在哪些以患者为中心的综合护理网络的实践模式,以及有哪些证据表明它们对就地健康老龄化的有效性。

方法和分析

我们将按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 提出的框架并根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所的最新指南进行范围综述。同行评议的来源将通过对七个数据库的搜索来确定,相关的灰色文献将通过专注于综合护理和/或健康老龄化的政策和志愿部门组织的网站来确定。将从纳入的研究中提取与研究问题相关的数据,包括网络模型的目标和预期结果、网络的财务和管理结构,以及评估的证据。将按设置呈现关键以患者为中心的综合护理网络特征的摘要表和叙述性比较。

伦理和传播

由于不会收集原始数据,因此进行这项范围综述不需要伦理批准。除了作为同行评议的文章发表外,还将总结该综述的结果,作为后续研究中使用的简短讨论文件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ff/11138266/1cb846ab21a5/bmjopen-2023-083077f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ff/11138266/1cb846ab21a5/bmjopen-2023-083077f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ff/11138266/1cb846ab21a5/bmjopen-2023-083077f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Community-based person-centred integrated care (PIC) networks for healthy ageing in place: a scoping review protocol.社区为基础的以人为本的整合照护 (PIC) 网络以实现健康老龄化就地安置:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 28;14(5):e083077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083077.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Preconception health and care policies, strategies and guidelines in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review protocol.英国和爱尔兰的孕前健康与保健政策、策略和指南:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 5;13(5):e067822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067822.
6
Integrated care for older people based on information and communication technology: a scoping review protocol.基于信息和通信技术的老年人综合护理:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 21;12(7):e061011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061011.
7
Mapping the evidence on integrated service delivery for non-communicable and infectious disease comorbidity in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a scoping review.对撒哈拉以南非洲地区非传染性和传染性疾病共病的综合服务提供情况进行证据绘制:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 19;14(6):e084740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084740.
8
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
9
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.
10
Regulatory standards and guidance for the use of health applications for self-management in Africa: scoping review protocol.监管标准和指导方针用于非洲的自我管理健康应用程序:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e058067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058067.

本文引用的文献

1
Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings.社区环境中体弱老年人综合护理的病例管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 23;5(5):CD013088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013088.pub2.
2
Exploring lessons from Covid-19 for the role of the voluntary sector in integrated care systems.探讨新冠疫情对志愿部门在综合医疗体系中作用的启示。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6689-e6698. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14062. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for community-dwelling, high-risk, frail, older people.
社区居住的、高风险的、体弱的老年人的全面老年评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD012705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012705.pub2.
4
Social prescribing: where is the evidence?社会处方:证据何在?
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):6-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700325.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Collaborative action for person-centred coordinated care (P3C): an approach to support the development of a comprehensive system-wide solution to fragmented care.协作行动以实现以患者为中心的协调照护(P3C):一种支持制定全面的系统级解决方案以应对碎片化照护的方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Nov 22;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0263-z.
7
The effectiveness of community-based coordinating interventions in dementia care: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of intervention components.基于社区的痴呆症护理协调干预措施的有效性:干预成分的荟萃分析和亚组分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2677-2.
8
Home or foster home care versus institutional long-term care for functionally dependent older people.功能依赖老年人的居家或寄养家庭护理与机构长期护理对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 3;4(4):CD009844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009844.pub2.
9
Impact of home care versus alternative locations of care on elder health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.居家护理与其他护理地点对老年人健康结局的影响:系统评价概述
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 14;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0395-y.
10
Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者居家支持的个案管理方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008345.pub2.