Suppr超能文献

逆行股骨髓内钉系统治疗股骨远端骨折时,锁定螺钉退出率较高。

Rates of interlock screw back-out are high with the retrograde femoral nailing advanced system for distal femur fractures.

机构信息

Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 4860 Y St #1700, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):2909-2913. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04006-5. Epub 2024 May 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The retrograde femoral nailing advanced (RFNA) system (DePuy synthes) is a commonly used implant for the fixation of low distal femur and periprosthetic fractures. There is concern that the rate of distal interlock screw back-out may be higher for the RFNA compared to other nails (ON). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of interlock screw back-out and associated screw removal for RFNA versus ON, along with associated risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent retrograde nailing for a distal femur fracture at an academic level one trauma center was performed. The incidence of distal interlock screw back-out and need for screw removal were compared for RFNA versus a propensity score matched cohort who received other nails.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients underwent retrograde nailing with the RFNA for a distal femur fracture from 2015 to 2022 (average age: 66, BMI: 32, 52.7% smokers, 54.5% female, 61.8%). There was a significantly higher rate of interlock back-out in the RFNA group compared to the ON (27 patients, 24.5% vs 12 patients, 10.9%, p = 0.01), which occurred 6.3 weeks postoperatively. Screw removal rates for back-out were not significantly different for the RFNA group versus ON (8 patients, 7.3% vs 3 patients, 2.7%, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective comparative study of distal femur fractures treated with retrograde nailing, the RFNA implant was associated with an increased risk of distal interlock screw back-out compared to other nails.

摘要

目的

逆行股骨钉先进(RFNA)系统(DePuy Synthes)是一种常用于固定低远端股骨和假体周围骨折的植入物。有人担心,与其他钉(ON)相比,RFNA 的远端锁定螺钉退出率可能更高。本研究的目的是评估 RFNA 与 ON 相比,锁定螺钉退出和相关螺钉取出的发生率,以及相关的危险因素。

方法

对一家学术水平一级创伤中心接受逆行钉治疗远端股骨骨折的患者进行回顾性比较研究。比较 RFNA 与接受其他钉的倾向评分匹配队列的远端锁定螺钉退出和需要螺钉取出的发生率。

结果

2015 年至 2022 年,110 例患者因远端股骨骨折接受 RFNA 逆行钉治疗(平均年龄:66 岁,BMI:32,52.7%吸烟者,54.5%女性,61.8%)。与 ON 相比,RFNA 组的锁定螺钉退出率明显更高(27 例,24.5%比 12 例,10.9%,p=0.01),术后 6.3 周发生。RFNA 组与 ON 组的螺钉退出后螺钉取出率无显著差异(8 例,7.3%比 3 例,2.7%,p=0.12)。

结论

在这项使用逆行钉治疗远端股骨骨折的回顾性比较研究中,与其他钉相比,RFNA 植入物与远端锁定螺钉退出的风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a030/11377647/031cca599074/590_2024_4006_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验