Nursing department, Student Research Committee, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Australian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05531-x.
Standardized patients are considered a significant educational method in medical sciences and have been successfully employed for many years. This study was conducted with the aim of explaining the experience of standardized patients participating in the education of medical student.
A qualitative content analysis approach was used. This study was conducted at Standardized Patient Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, May to February 2022. Fifteen standard patients were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation. Semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted with standard patients. The average duration of the interviews was 60 to 90 min. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the Graneheim and Lundman approach.
A passport for the future and duality of feelings were the two main themes identified in this study with six subthemes. One of the main themes was passport for the future with subthemes creative, participation in educating future generation, reflection and another theme was duality of feeling with subthemes feeling of value, guilty conscience, and fear of judgment by others.
The participants expressed having mixed feelings about their role as standard patients. They felt conflicted because they were compensated for their participation, which made them worry about being judged by others and feel guilty about taking the fee. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct further studies in this area.
标准化病人被认为是医学科学中一种重要的教育方法,多年来已成功应用。本研究旨在解释标准化病人参与医学生教育的体验。
采用定性内容分析法。本研究于 2022 年 5 月至 2 月在伊朗德黑兰大学医学科学标准化患者中心进行。通过最大变异的目的性抽样选择了 15 名标准化患者。对标准化患者进行了半结构化、深入的面对面访谈。访谈的平均持续时间为 60 至 90 分钟。使用 Graneheim 和 Lundman 方法对数据进行转录和分析。
本研究确定了两个主要主题:未来的通行证和双重感受,有六个子主题。其中一个主要主题是未来的通行证,有创造性、参与教育下一代、反思等子主题;另一个主题是双重感受,有价值感、内疚感和害怕被他人评判等子主题。
参与者对他们作为标准化病人的角色表达了复杂的感受。他们感到矛盾,因为他们的参与得到了补偿,这使他们担心被他人评判,并对收取费用感到内疚。因此,建议在这一领域进行进一步的研究。