Suppr超能文献

标准化患者参与医学生教育的体验:定性内容分析。

Standardized patients' experience of participating in medical students' education: a qualitative content analysis.

机构信息

Nursing department, Student Research Committee, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Australian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05531-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardized patients are considered a significant educational method in medical sciences and have been successfully employed for many years. This study was conducted with the aim of explaining the experience of standardized patients participating in the education of medical student.

METHOD

A qualitative content analysis approach was used. This study was conducted at Standardized Patient Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, May to February 2022. Fifteen standard patients were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation. Semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted with standard patients. The average duration of the interviews was 60 to 90 min. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the Graneheim and Lundman approach.

RESULTS

A passport for the future and duality of feelings were the two main themes identified in this study with six subthemes. One of the main themes was passport for the future with subthemes creative, participation in educating future generation, reflection and another theme was duality of feeling with subthemes feeling of value, guilty conscience, and fear of judgment by others.

CONCLUSION

The participants expressed having mixed feelings about their role as standard patients. They felt conflicted because they were compensated for their participation, which made them worry about being judged by others and feel guilty about taking the fee. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct further studies in this area.

摘要

背景

标准化病人被认为是医学科学中一种重要的教育方法,多年来已成功应用。本研究旨在解释标准化病人参与医学生教育的体验。

方法

采用定性内容分析法。本研究于 2022 年 5 月至 2 月在伊朗德黑兰大学医学科学标准化患者中心进行。通过最大变异的目的性抽样选择了 15 名标准化患者。对标准化患者进行了半结构化、深入的面对面访谈。访谈的平均持续时间为 60 至 90 分钟。使用 Graneheim 和 Lundman 方法对数据进行转录和分析。

结果

本研究确定了两个主要主题:未来的通行证和双重感受,有六个子主题。其中一个主要主题是未来的通行证,有创造性、参与教育下一代、反思等子主题;另一个主题是双重感受,有价值感、内疚感和害怕被他人评判等子主题。

结论

参与者对他们作为标准化病人的角色表达了复杂的感受。他们感到矛盾,因为他们的参与得到了补偿,这使他们担心被他人评判,并对收取费用感到内疚。因此,建议在这一领域进行进一步的研究。

相似文献

3
Factors affecting self-regulated learning in medical students: a qualitative study.
Med Educ Online. 2015 Nov 6;20:28694. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28694. eCollection 2015.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
The challenges of medical students in their internship : a qualitative study from Iran.
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Sep 2;17(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06883-9.
6
Women living with infertility in Iran: A qualitative content analysis of perception of dignity.
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241260027. doi: 10.1177/17455057241260027.
8
Why are medical students so motivated to learn ultrasound skills? A qualitative study.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05420-3.
9
Medical students' attitudes on and experiences with evidence-based medicine: a qualitative study.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):779-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12191. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
The Role of Students with Practical Nursing Diplomas in the Process of Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Qualitative Study.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Dec 27;25(1):76-83. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_38_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.

引用本文的文献

2
General dentists' treatment plans in response to cosmetic complains; a field study using unannounced-standardized-patient.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 20;10(19):e38205. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38205. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardized Patients' Perspectives on Bias in Student Encounters.
Acad Med. 2022 Nov 1;97(11S):S29-S34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004925. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Standardized Patient Simulation in an Oncology Symptom Management Seminar-Style Course: Prelicensure Nursing Student Outcomes.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):185-192. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02096-x. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study of Standardized Patient Comments on Empathy and Student Communication Scores.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Feb;86(2):ajpe8642. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8642. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
Quality assurance processes for standardized patient programs.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):523-528. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
Systematic Review of Standardized Patient Use in Continuing Medical Education.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018 Winter;38(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000190.
9
The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Jun 27;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验