Suppr超能文献

迈向个性化医学:脓毒症免疫治疗的范围综述。

Towards personalized medicine: a scoping review of immunotherapy in sepsis.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Room G3-220, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2024 May 28;28(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04964-6.

Abstract

Despite significant progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and extensive clinical research, there are few proven therapies addressing the underlying immune dysregulation of this life-threatening condition. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the literature evaluating immunotherapy in adult patients with sepsis, emphasizing on methods providing a "personalized immunotherapy" approach, which was defined as the classification of patients into a distinct subgroup or subphenotype, in which a patient's immune profile is used to guide treatment. Subgroups are subsets of sepsis patients, based on any cut-off in a variable. Subphenotypes are subgroups that can be reliably discriminated from other subgroup based on data-driven assessments. Included studies were randomized controlled trials and cohort studies investigating immunomodulatory therapies in adults with sepsis. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov, from the first paper available until January 29th, 2024. The search resulted in 15,853 studies. Title and abstract screening resulted in 1409 studies (9%), assessed for eligibility; 771 studies were included, of which 282 (37%) were observational and 489 (63%) interventional. Treatment groups included were treatments targeting the innate immune response, the complement system, coagulation and endothelial dysfunction, non-pharmalogical treatment, pleiotropic drugs, immunonutrition, concomitant treatments, Traditional Chinese Medicine, immunostimulatory cytokines and growth factors, intravenous immunoglobulins, mesenchymal stem cells and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. A personalized approach was incorporated in 70 studies (9%). Enrichment was applied using cut-offs in temperature, laboratory, biomarker or genetic variables. Trials often showed conflicting results, possibly due to the lack of patient stratification or the potential influence of severity and timing on immunomodulatory therapy results. When a personalized approach was applied, trends of clinical benefit for several interventions emerged, which hold promise for future clinical trials using personalized immunotherapy.

摘要

尽管我们在理解脓毒症的病理生理学方面取得了重大进展,并进行了广泛的临床研究,但针对这种危及生命的疾病潜在免疫失调的治疗方法却寥寥无几。本范围综述的目的是描述评估成人脓毒症患者免疫疗法的文献,重点介绍提供“个性化免疫疗法”方法的文献,这种方法被定义为将患者分为不同的亚组或亚表型,根据患者的免疫特征来指导治疗。亚组是根据变量中的任何截止值对脓毒症患者进行的分类。亚表型是可以根据基于数据的评估可靠地区分其他亚组的亚组。纳入的研究为随机对照试验和队列研究,研究对象为脓毒症成人的免疫调节治疗。通过在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上搜索,从最早的论文开始,一直搜索到 2024 年 1 月 29 日,检索到 15853 篇研究。标题和摘要筛选后,有 1409 篇研究(9%)被评估是否符合纳入标准;纳入了 771 项研究,其中 282 项(37%)为观察性研究,489 项(63%)为干预性研究。治疗组包括针对固有免疫反应、补体系统、凝血和内皮功能障碍的治疗、非药物治疗、多效性药物、免疫营养、联合治疗、中药、免疫刺激细胞因子和生长因子、静脉注射免疫球蛋白、间充质干细胞和免疫检查点抑制剂。70 项研究(9%)采用了个性化方法。使用温度、实验室、生物标志物或遗传变量的截止值进行了富集。试验结果往往存在冲突,这可能是由于缺乏患者分层或严重程度和时机对免疫调节治疗结果的潜在影响。当采用个性化方法时,几种干预措施的临床获益趋势出现,这为未来使用个性化免疫疗法的临床试验提供了希望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/254e/11134696/6b7d9e58f0f3/13054_2024_4964_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验