Lau Jerrald, Khoo Athena Ming-Gui, Choe Lina, Hoon Alyssa, Tan Ker-Kan
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(2):141-149. doi: 10.1111/ajco.14082. Epub 2024 May 29.
Chemotherapy is one of the common treatments in cancer management. However, chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) is one notable side effect that can greatly impact a patient's quality of life. Literature on CICI in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are few and inconsistent. This review aims to identify the methodological differences in such studies.
A systematic search was performed in four electronic databases. All peer-reviewed primary literature published in English that evaluated cognitive-related functioning scores related to chemotherapy in GI cancer patients were included. Information about each study such as CICI findings, study limitations, methodology, and sample characteristics was extracted and synthesized.
A total of 19 studies were included. Evidence of CICI was found in 50.0% (8 of 16) and 62.5% (5 of 8) studies that used objective and subjective measures, respectively. Methodological differences such as groups used for comparison, instruments used, and assessment from the length of time since chemotherapy were highlighted between studies that did and did not find evidence of CICI.
This review suggests that the mixed findings can be attributed to the heterogeneous methodologies adopted in the evaluation of CICI in this field.
Further studies are necessary to establish the presence and chronicity of CICI, and in which groups of patients to facilitate targeted interventions and treatments.
化疗是癌症治疗中的常见方法之一。然而,化疗引起的认知障碍(CICI)是一种显著的副作用,会对患者的生活质量产生重大影响。关于胃肠道(GI)癌症中CICI的文献较少且不一致。本综述旨在确定此类研究中的方法学差异。
在四个电子数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入所有以英文发表的、评估GI癌症患者化疗相关认知功能评分的同行评审的原始文献。提取并综合了每项研究的相关信息,如CICI研究结果、研究局限性、方法和样本特征。
共纳入19项研究。分别使用客观和主观测量方法的研究中,发现CICI证据的比例分别为50.0%(16项中的8项)和62.5%(8项中的5项)。在发现和未发现CICI证据的研究之间,突出了方法学差异,如用于比较的组、使用的工具以及化疗后时间长度的评估。
本综述表明,研究结果不一可归因于该领域评估CICI时采用的方法学异质性。
有必要进一步研究以确定CICI的存在和持续性,以及哪些患者群体需要进行有针对性的干预和治疗。