División de Oncología y Uronefrología, Departamento de Radioterapia, Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional "Ignacio García Téllez", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mérida Yucatán, CP 97150, México.
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2024 Aug;63(3):443-454. doi: 10.1007/s00411-024-01075-2. Epub 2024 May 29.
This study aimed to evaluate the modulated arc therapy (mARC) technique as a planning and treatment option for hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0933 dosimetric criteria. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected retrospectively for 15 patients. Two types of plans were created for each patient, namely an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and a mARC plan. IMRT and mARC plans were compared in terms of plan quality indices, absorbed dose to organs at risk (OARs), number of monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. All plans in both techniques were considered clinically acceptable for treatment. However, IMRT plans presented a higher conformity (p = 0.01) as well as a higher homogeneity as compared to mARC plans, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In terms of the preservation of the hippocampus, it was observed that the IMRT plans achieved significantly lower doses for both 100% of its volume and for its maximum dose (p < 0.001). The evaluation of the remaining OARs showed that the IMRT technique resulted in lower doses, and significant differences were observed for the following organs: left cochlea (p < 0.001), left eye (p < 0.001), right eye (p = 0.03), both lenses of the eye (p < 0.001), and right optic nerve (p = 0.02). Despite these differences, the absolute differences in all dosimetric parameters were low enough to bear any clinical relevance. A drastic (close to 65%) and significant (p < 0.001) decrease was observed in the number of MUs for the mARC plans. This resulted in a substantial decrease in treatment time (60.45%, p < 0.001). It is concluded that the mARC technique is a feasible planning and treatment solution for HS-WBRT that meets the RTOG 0933 criteria. The main advantage of using mARC over IMRT for HS-WBRT is the considerable reduction in MUs and treatment time.
本研究旨在评估调强弧形治疗(mARC)技术作为符合放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)0933 剂量学标准的海马保护全脑放疗(HS-WBRT)的一种计划和治疗选择。回顾性选择了 15 名患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)。为每位患者创建了两种类型的计划,即调强放疗(IMRT)和 mARC 计划。从计划质量指标、危及器官(OAR)吸收剂量、监测器单位(MU)数量和治疗时间等方面比较了 IMRT 和 mARC 计划。两种技术的所有计划均被认为可用于治疗。然而,与 mARC 计划相比,IMRT 计划的适形度更高(p=0.01),均匀性更好,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在保护海马方面,观察到 IMRT 计划使其 100%体积和最大剂量的剂量明显降低(p<0.001)。对其余 OAR 的评估表明,IMRT 技术导致剂量降低,以下器官存在显著差异:左耳蜗(p<0.001)、左眼(p<0.001)、右眼(p=0.03)、双眼晶状体(p<0.001)和右视神经(p=0.02)。尽管存在这些差异,但所有剂量学参数的绝对差异低到足以具有任何临床相关性。mARC 计划的 MU 数量大幅(接近 65%)且显著(p<0.001)降低。这导致治疗时间大幅减少(60.45%,p<0.001)。结论:mARC 技术是一种可行的 HS-WBRT 计划和治疗方案,符合 RTOG 0933 标准。与 HS-WBRT 相比,mARC 的主要优势在于 MU 和治疗时间的大量减少。