• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤暴露的中国青少年中复杂创伤后应激障碍和分离:潜在类别分析。

Complex posttraumatic stress disorder and dissociation in trauma-exposed Chinese adolescents: a latent class analysis.

机构信息

Laboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2351292. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2351292. Epub 2024 May 29.

DOI:10.1080/20008066.2024.2351292
PMID:38809665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11138217/
Abstract

Preliminary evidence provides support for the proposition that there is a dissociative subtype of Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). Research on this proposition would extend our knowledge on the association between CPTSD and dissociation, guide contemporary thinking regarding placement of dissociation in the nosology of CPTSD, and inform clinically useful assessment and intervention. The present study aimed to investigate the co-occurring patterns of CPTSD and dissociative symptoms in a large sample of trauma exposed adolescents from China, and specify clinical features covariates of such patterns including childhood trauma, comorbidities with major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and functional impairment. Participants included 57,984 high school students exposed to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. CPTSD and dissociative symptoms, childhood traumatic experience, and functional impairment were measured with the Global Psychotrauma Screen for Teenagers (GPS-T). Major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms were measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Latent class analysis (LCA) was employed to test the co-occurring patterns of CPTSD and dissociative symptoms. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and chi-square tests were respectively used to examine between-class differences in continuous and categorical clinical covariates. A 5-class model emerged as the best-fitting model, including resilience, predominantly PTSD symptoms, predominantly disturbances in self-organization (DSO)symptoms, predominantly CPTSD symptoms, and CPTSD dissociative subtype classes. The CPTSD dissociative subtype class showed the lowest level of functioning and the highest rates of MDD, GAD and childhood trauma. Our findings provide initial empirical evidence supporting the existence of a dissociative subtype of CPTSD, and inform for further research and clinical practice on traumatized individuals.

摘要

初步证据支持这样一种观点,即创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)存在一种分离亚型。对这一观点的研究将扩展我们对 CPTSD 与分离之间关联的认识,指导我们对 CPTSD 分类中分离位置的当代思考,并为临床有用的评估和干预提供信息。本研究旨在调查中国大样本创伤暴露青少年中 CPTSD 和分离症状的共同发生模式,并确定此类模式的临床特征协变量,包括儿童期创伤、与重度抑郁症(MDD)和广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的共病以及功能障碍。参与者包括 57984 名暴露于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的高中生。CPTSD 和分离症状、儿童期创伤经历以及功能障碍采用青少年全球心理创伤筛查(GPS-T)进行测量。使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)分别测量 MDD 和 GAD 症状。采用潜在类别分析(LCA)检验 CPTSD 和分离症状的共同发生模式。协方差分析(ANCOVA)和卡方检验分别用于检验连续和分类临床协变量的类间差异。5 类模型是最佳拟合模型,包括韧性、主要 PTSD 症状、主要自我组织障碍(DSO)症状、主要 CPTSD 症状和 CPTSD 分离亚型。CPTSD 分离亚型表现出最低的功能水平和最高的 MDD、GAD 和儿童期创伤发生率。我们的研究结果为创伤后个体的进一步研究和临床实践提供了支持 CPTSD 存在分离亚型的初步经验证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69bd/11138217/cd4f7f9b90ff/ZEPT_A_2351292_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69bd/11138217/cd4f7f9b90ff/ZEPT_A_2351292_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69bd/11138217/cd4f7f9b90ff/ZEPT_A_2351292_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Complex posttraumatic stress disorder and dissociation in trauma-exposed Chinese adolescents: a latent class analysis.创伤暴露的中国青少年中复杂创伤后应激障碍和分离:潜在类别分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2351292. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2351292. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
A latent class analysis of dissociative PTSD subtype among Chinese adolescents following the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown.新冠疫情与封控期间中国青少年创伤后应激障碍解离亚型的潜类别分析
J Affect Disord. 2024 Mar 15;349:596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.078. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Examination of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent version (ITQ-CA) in a sample of Danish children and adolescents exposed to abuse.使用国际创伤问卷-儿童和青少年版(ITQ-CA)对丹麦受虐待的儿童和青少年样本中 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2178761. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2178761.
4
Is Dissociation a Fundamental Component of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder?分离是否为 ICD-11 复杂型创伤后应激障碍的一个基本组成部分?
J Trauma Dissociation. 2024 Jan-Feb;25(1):45-61. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2023.2231928. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
5
Psychometric properties of the dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder scale: replication and extension in two German-speaking samples.创伤后应激障碍分离亚型量表的心理测量特性:在两个德语样本中的复制和扩展。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2238492. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2238492.
6
Persistence and clinical consequences of post-traumatic and dissociative symptoms in people with depressive symptoms: a one-year follow-up study.创伤后和分离症状在抑郁症状人群中的持续存在及其临床后果:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2263314. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2263314. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
7
Evidence of distinct profiles of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) based on the new ICD-11 Trauma Questionnaire (ICD-TQ).基于新的国际疾病分类第11版创伤问卷(ICD-TQ)的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)不同特征的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 1;207:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Prevalence and predictors of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder and complex PTSD in young people.青少年创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍的流行情况及预测因素。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022 Aug;146(2):110-125. doi: 10.1111/acps.13442. Epub 2022 May 11.
9
Complex PTSD in Chinese Adolescents Exposed to Childhood Trauma: A Latent Profile Analysis.遭受童年创伤的中国青少年中的复杂性创伤后应激障碍:一项潜在剖面分析
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP20190-NP20211. doi: 10.1177/08862605211050111. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
10
Differentiating symptom profiles of ICD-11 PTSD, complex PTSD, and borderline personality disorder: A latent class analysis in a multiply traumatized sample.鉴别 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍、复杂创伤后应激障碍和边缘型人格障碍的症状特征:在一个多次创伤样本中的潜在类别分析。
Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):36-45. doi: 10.1037/per0000346. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of lifestyle and their associations with anxiety symptoms among adolescents in Liaoning Province, China: a latent class analysis.中国辽宁省青少年的生活方式模式及其与焦虑症状的关联:一项潜在类别分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 8;13:1599214. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1599214. eCollection 2025.
2
Obsessive-compulsive symptoms as a unique presentation of complex posttraumatic stress disorder in Southeast Asia: a case report.强迫症症状作为东南亚复杂性创伤后应激障碍的一种独特表现:一例病例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2025 May 31;19(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05323-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociative Symptoms in Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review.复杂性创伤后应激障碍中的分离症状:一项系统综述。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2024 Mar-Apr;25(2):232-247. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2023.2293785. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
What are the predictive variables that increase the risk of developing a complex trauma? A meta-analysis.哪些预测变量会增加发展为复杂创伤的风险?一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Dec 15;343:153-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Is Dissociation a Fundamental Component of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder?
分离是否为 ICD-11 复杂型创伤后应激障碍的一个基本组成部分?
J Trauma Dissociation. 2024 Jan-Feb;25(1):45-61. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2023.2231928. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
The Relationship Between Dissociation and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Scoping Review.分离与复杂性创伤后应激障碍之间的关系:一项范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Dec;24(5):2966-2982. doi: 10.1177/15248380221120835. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
5
The Dissociative Subtype of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature using the Latent Profile Analysis.创伤后应激障碍的分离亚型:使用潜在剖面分析的文献系统评价。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2024 May-Jun;25(3):349-365. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2022.2120155. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
6
Complex post-traumatic stress disorder.复杂性创伤后应激障碍。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):60-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00821-2.
7
Prevalence of the dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤后应激障碍解离亚型的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;52(9):1629-1644. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722001647. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 Item (GAD-7) in a Large Sample of Chinese Adolescents.广泛性焦虑障碍量表7项版(GAD - 7)在中国大量青少年样本中的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;9(12):1709. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121709.
9
Anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptoms among high school students in china in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown.中国高中生在应对 COVID-19 大流行和封锁期间的焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.052. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
The Value of Dimensional Models of Early Experience: Thinking Clearly About Concepts and Categories.早期经验的维度模型的价值:清晰思考概念和范畴。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1463-1472. doi: 10.1177/1745691621992346. Epub 2021 Sep 7.