Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jan 1;55(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90290-5.
The overall results of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) showed a nonsignificant 7% lower coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality rate in the special-intervention (SI) as compared to the usual-care (UC) group. The initial results also suggested that the SI program was more effective than UC in the community in reducing the CAD mortality rate in nonhypertensive persons than in hypertensive persons, and that the SI program used was more effective in reducing CAD deaths among men without than men with electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities at rest. Furthermore, an unfavorable mortality trend in hypertensive SI men with ECG abnormalities at rest compared with UC men was noted (adjusted relative risk of 1.67). Further analyses in baseline-defined subgroups indicated that (1) the most common ECG abnormalities at rest were high R waves and ST-T changes, (2) the CAD mortality differential (SI/UC) was similar in the subgroup with these abnormalities and in the subgroup with other abnormalities at rest, (3) the apparent excess CAD mortality among hypertensive SI men with ECG abnormalities at rest was manifested chiefly as sudden death within 1 hour, and (4) the association between ECG abnormalities at rest and the CAD mortality rate among hypertensive men was independent of the baseline level of blood pressure or of the findings on the exercise electrocardiogram. However, CAD mortality in those with abnormalities on the electrocardiogram both at rest and during exercise was lower in the SI than the UC group. A possible explanation for the difference in outcome in the baseline-defined subgroup was an unexpectedly low UC mortality rate. However, within-group analysis revealed an interaction between ECG abnormalities at rest and diuretic treatment in the SI group, with the risk of CAD death for men prescribed diuretic drugs relative to men not prescribed diuretic drugs estimated as 3.34 among men with baseline ECG abnormalities at rest and as 0.95 among men without such abnormalities. No such effect was found in the UC group, in which men generally were prescribed lower doses of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone than SI men. However, analyses do not suggest an effect of diuretic dose or of hypokalemia on the CAD mortality rate in treated SI participants. Although subgroup analyses must be interpreted with caution, particularly those that go beyond the randomized clinical trial design by the MRFIT, these findings pose hypotheses for investigation by other researchers in systemic hypertension and may have implications for therapy.
多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)的总体结果显示,与常规护理(UC)组相比,特殊干预(SI)组的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)死亡率降低了7%,但差异无统计学意义。初步结果还表明,在社区中,SI项目在降低非高血压人群的CAD死亡率方面比高血压人群更有效,而且所采用的SI项目在降低静息心电图(ECG)无异常男性的CAD死亡方面比有异常的男性更有效。此外,还注意到静息心电图异常的高血压SI组男性与UC组男性相比存在不利的死亡率趋势(调整后的相对风险为1.67)。对基线定义的亚组进行的进一步分析表明:(1)静息时最常见的心电图异常是高R波和ST-T改变;(2)有这些异常的亚组与静息时有其他异常的亚组中CAD死亡率差异(SI/UC)相似;(3)静息心电图异常的高血压SI组男性中明显过高的CAD死亡率主要表现为1小时内猝死;(4)静息心电图异常与高血压男性CAD死亡率之间的关联独立于血压基线水平或运动心电图结果。然而,静息和运动时心电图均异常者的CAD死亡率在SI组低于UC组。对基线定义亚组中结果差异的一个可能解释是UC组的死亡率意外地低。然而,组内分析显示,SI组静息心电图异常与利尿剂治疗之间存在相互作用,对于开具了利尿剂的男性,相对于未开具利尿剂的男性,静息心电图有基线异常的男性CAD死亡风险估计为3.34,无此类异常的男性为0.95。UC组未发现此类效应,该组男性通常比SI组男性服用的氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮剂量更低。然而,分析未提示利尿剂剂量或低钾血症对接受治疗的SI参与者CAD死亡率有影响。尽管亚组分析必须谨慎解读,尤其是那些超出MRFIT随机临床试验设计的分析,但这些发现为其他研究系统性高血压的研究者提出了有待研究的假设,可能对治疗有启示意义。