Suppr超能文献

技术说明:多靶单点 SRS-A 适形治疗计划的个体化质量保证。

Technical note: Patient-specific quality assurance for multi-target single-isocenter SRS-A target-specific approach.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University Health Arnett, Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2024 Sep;51(9):6469-6474. doi: 10.1002/mp.17190. Epub 2024 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As radiotherapy techniques advance, so do planning methods for multi-target intracranial SRS cases. Multi-target-single-isocenter (MTSI) planning offers high-precision beam delivery with shortened duration. However, accommodating all targets in a single Patient-Specific-Quality-Assurance (PSQA) with QA devices like SRS MapCHECK (SRS MC) is generally impractical.

PURPOSE

Consequently, we conducted PSQA, using a custom script, by relocating each Target or Neighboring-Target-Group (T-NTG) relative to the beam isocenter on the PSQA device, ensuring each target's dose coverage at high precision.

METHODS

SRS treatment plans use 6MV-FFF beams, consisting of four Volumetric Modulated ARC Therapy (VMAT) arcs, including one full-arc and three half arcs with couch-kicks. A custom script calculated T-NTG coordinates relative to the beam isocenter. QA verification plans were created for each T-NTG, redefining the beam isocenter for precise alignment with the center of the SRS MC. CBCT images were acquired during PSQA for SRS MC alignment, and gamma-index analysis (GIA) was performed. A single-tail paired t-test assessed the passing rate (PR) for 75 QA verification plans.

RESULTS

GIA with l.0 mm/2.0% criteria for each QA plan yielded a PR > 95.5%, with an average of 98.9%. Plans achieving PR > 99.0% and > 97.0% constituted 63% and 92% of studied plans, respectively. Statistical significance was observed in a t-test with an ideal PR value of 100%, while insignificance was found with a PR value of 99%, suggesting that PSQA for individual targets consistently approaches 99% PR. In MTSI cases using 6MV-FFF beams, targets within the lateral dose-fall-off region require careful verification for acceptability. Our clinical study on individual T-NTG relocation demonstrates that the presented PSQA methods are generally acceptable, supported by a statistically insignificant PR against a 99% PR value.

CONCLUSIONS

Presented statistical analysis results indicate that the proposed PSQA approach can serve as a reliable tool in clinical settings.

摘要

背景

随着放射治疗技术的进步,多靶颅内立体定向放射外科(SRS)病例的计划方法也在不断发展。多靶-单等中心(MTSI)计划提供了高精度的光束传输,并缩短了治疗时间。然而,在单个患者特定质量保证(PSQA)中容纳所有靶区,并使用 SRS MapCHECK(SRS MC)等 QA 设备进行质量保证通常是不切实际的。

目的

因此,我们通过在 PSQA 设备上相对于光束等中心重新定位每个靶区或相邻靶区组(T-NTG),使用定制脚本进行 PSQA,以确保每个靶区的高剂量覆盖精度。

方法

SRS 治疗计划使用 6MV-FFF 光束,由四个容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)弧形组成,包括一个全弧形和三个带床架旋转的半弧形。定制脚本计算 T-NTG 相对于光束等中心的坐标。为每个 T-NTG 创建 QA 验证计划,重新定义光束等中心,以与 SRS MC 的中心精确对齐。在 PSQA 期间获取 CBCT 图像,进行伽马指数分析(GIA)。对 75 个 QA 验证计划进行单尾配对 t 检验,评估通过率(PR)。

结果

对于每个 QA 计划,使用 1.0mm/2.0%的标准进行 GIA,得出 PR>95.5%,平均为 98.9%。达到 PR>99.0%和 PR>97.0%的计划分别占研究计划的 63%和 92%。对于理想的 PR 值为 100%的 t 检验,观察到统计学意义,而对于 PR 值为 99%的 t 检验,则未观察到统计学意义,这表明对于单个靶区的 PSQA 一致性地接近 99%的 PR。在使用 6MV-FFF 光束的 MTSI 情况下,需要对侧方剂量下降区域内的靶区进行仔细验证。我们对单个 T-NTG 重新定位的临床研究表明,所提出的 PSQA 方法通常是可以接受的,与 99%的 PR 值相比,PR 值的统计学意义不显著。

结论

提出的统计分析结果表明,所提出的 PSQA 方法可以作为临床环境中的可靠工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验