Department of Surgery, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland.
Department of Surgery, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland.
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.072. Epub 2024 May 28.
Transversus abdominis release (TAR) is increasingly being performed for reconstruction of complex incisional and recurrent ventral hernias, with complication rates ranging from 17.4% to 33.3% after open TAR (oTAR) or robotic TAR (rTAR). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients undergoing TAR with macroporous polypropylene mesh (MPM) and to compare outcomes between oTAR and rTAR.
A retrospective review of 183 consecutive patients undergoing TAR with MPM performed by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 was performed. Patients with less than one year of follow-up were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes between oTAR and rTAR patients.
Average patient age was 59.4 y, median body mass index was 33.2 kg/m, and median hernia width was 12.0 cm. Forty 2 (23%) patients underwent oTAR, 127 (69%) underwent rTAR, and 14 (8%) underwent laparoscopic TAR. Patients experienced 16.4%, 10.4%, 3.8%, and 6.0% rates of overall complications, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, and other complications, respectively. At average follow-up of 2.3 y, a 2.7% hernia recurrence rate was observed. In comparison to patients undergoing oTAR, rTAR patients required shorter operative times and length of stay, and were less likely to experience postoperative complications overall, and other complications. Recurrence rates were similar between oTAR and rTAR.
Patients undergoing TAR with MPM experienced complication and recurrence rates in alignment with previously published results. In comparison to oTAR, rTAR was associated with more favorable perioperative outcomes and complication rates, but similar recurrence rates.
腹横肌释放术(TAR)越来越多地用于重建复杂的切口和复发性腹疝,开放式 TAR(oTAR)或机器人 TAR(rTAR)后的并发症发生率为 17.4%至 33.3%。本研究旨在描述接受多孔聚丙烯网(MPM)TAR 的患者的结果,并比较 oTAR 和 rTAR 之间的结果。
对 2015 年至 2021 年期间由一位外科医生在一家机构内连续进行的 183 例接受 MPM TAR 的患者进行回顾性分析。排除随访时间少于 1 年的患者。对 oTAR 和 rTAR 患者的结果进行单因素分析。
患者平均年龄为 59.4 岁,平均 BMI 为 33.2 kg/m,平均疝宽为 12.0 cm。40 例患者接受 oTAR,127 例患者接受 rTAR,14 例患者接受腹腔镜 TAR。患者的总并发症、手术部位事件、手术部位感染和其他并发症的发生率分别为 16.4%、10.4%、3.8%和 6.0%。平均随访 2.3 年后,观察到疝复发率为 2.7%。与接受 oTAR 的患者相比,rTAR 患者的手术时间和住院时间更短,总体术后并发症和其他并发症的发生率较低。oTAR 和 rTAR 的复发率相似。
接受 MPM TAR 的患者的并发症和复发率与先前发表的结果一致。与 oTAR 相比,rTAR 与更有利的围手术期结果和并发症发生率相关,但复发率相似。