• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹横肌释放术的混合机器人与开放手术:30 天结局的倾向匹配分析。

Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release versus open: propensity-matched analysis of 30-day outcomes.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.

Center for Quantitative Sciences Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1491-1497. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02249-9. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02249-9
PMID:32607651
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day outcomes of hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) compared with open transversus abdominis release (oTAR).

METHODS

Patients receiving hrTAR were selected from the AHSQC database and propensity matched with a contemporary cohort of oTAR patients.

RESULTS

The cohort included 95 hrTAR and 285 oTAR patients. There was a significantly shorter median LOS in the hrTAR cohort (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). The rate of surgical site occurrences in the hrTAR cohort was also lower than for oTAR (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.015). Readmission rates were not different between hrTAR and oTAR (6% vs. 8%, p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

hrTAR demonstrates improved LOS compared to oTAR as well as fewer surgical site related occurrences. Further studies are needed to investigate the etiology behind the improved LOS and to confirm appropriate long-term outcomes from hybrid robotic TAR.

摘要

目的

比较杂交机器人腹横肌松解术(hrTAR)与开放式腹横肌松解术(oTAR)的住院时间(LOS)和 30 天结果。

方法

从 AHSQC 数据库中选择接受 hrTAR 的患者,并与同期接受 oTAR 的患者进行倾向评分匹配。

结果

该队列包括 95 例 hrTAR 和 285 例 oTAR 患者。hrTAR 组的中位 LOS 明显缩短(3 天 vs. 5 天,p<0.001)。hrTAR 组的手术部位相关并发症发生率也低于 oTAR 组(5% vs. 15%,p=0.015)。hrTAR 和 oTAR 的再入院率无差异(6% vs. 8%,p=0.65)。

结论

与 oTAR 相比,hrTAR 显示出更好的 LOS 和更少的手术部位相关并发症。需要进一步研究以探讨改善 LOS 的病因,并确认杂交机器人 TAR 的适当长期结果。

相似文献

1
Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release versus open: propensity-matched analysis of 30-day outcomes.腹横肌释放术的混合机器人与开放手术:30 天结局的倾向匹配分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1491-1497. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02249-9. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes.机器人辅助下的腹横肌释放术与开放式腹横肌释放术的比较:短期疗效比较。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1858-1. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
3
Robotic and hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release may be performed with low length of stay and wound morbidity.机器人和杂交机器人腹横肌松解术可能具有较低的住院时间和伤口发病率。
Am J Surg. 2018 Mar;215(3):462-465. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.053. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair.开放式与机器人经腹横肌平面松解在腹疝修补术中的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5729-0. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Outcomes of Transversus Abdominis Release With Macroporous Polypropylene Mesh.腹横肌释放联合大孔聚丙烯网片在治疗中的效果。
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.072. Epub 2024 May 28.
6
Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis.腹横肌松解术(TAR)治疗腹疝修补:开放式还是机器人辅助?系统评价和荟萃分析的短期结果。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1471-1480. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02487-5. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
7
Transversus abdominis release with posterior component separation in patients with previously recurrent ventral hernias: A single institution experience.经腹横肌松解联合后入路腹直肌分离在复发性腹前壁疝患者中的应用:单中心经验。
Surgery. 2022 Mar;171(3):806-810. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.067. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic posterior component separation in complex abdominal wall repair.开放式与机器人辅助腹腔镜下腹膜后组件分离在复杂腹壁修复中的应用比较。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac057.
9
Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair and transversus abdominis release: short-term outcomes and risk factors associated with perioperative complications.机器人辅助肌后腹侧疝修补术及腹横肌松解术:围手术期并发症的短期结局及相关危险因素
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01911-1. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release.机器人与开放腹横肌释放术的围手术期结果比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):840-845. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5752-1. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical Impact of the Introduction of a Robot-Assisted Program in a Specialized Hernia Center: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study on Short-Term Outcomes.机器人辅助程序引入专业疝气中心的临床影响:一项关于短期结局的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Mar;49(3):617-625. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12477. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Outcomes after open posterior component separation via transversus abdominis release (TAR) for incisional hernia repair. A systematic review and meta-analysis.开放式腹横筋膜切开后入路腹部分离术(TAR)治疗切口疝修补术的结果。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2097-2109. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03142-5. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Length of Stay and Opioid Dose Requirement with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block vs Epidural Analgesia for Ventral Hernia Repair.腹横肌平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛用于治疗腹侧疝修补术的住院时间和阿片类药物需求。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):680-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.017. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Systematic review of transversus abdominis release in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.腹横肌松解在复杂腹壁重建中的系统评价。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):5-15. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1870-5. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes.
Robotic transversus abdominis release using HUGO RAS system: our initial experience.
使用HUGO RAS系统的机器人腹横肌松解术:我们的初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3395-3404. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10865-0. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive techniques in posterior component separation for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创技术在后路腹疝修补中应用的短期疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1497-1509. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03030-y. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
Assessing Textbook Outcome After Implementation of Transversus Abdominis Release in a Regional Hospital.在一家地区医院实施腹横肌松解术后评估教科书式的治疗效果。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2022 Jul 6;1:10517. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2022.10517. eCollection 2022.
6
Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia-early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS).机器人辅助切口疝修补术-大学机器人疝项目的早期经验及与开放和微创经腹腔入路腹膜前修补术(eMILOS)的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 12;408(1):396. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03129-3.
7
Outcomes of open transverse abdominis release for ventral hernias: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of factors affecting them.开放式腹横肌松解术治疗腹外疝的结局:影响因素的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):235-244. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02657-z. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
8
Open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic posterior component separation in complex abdominal wall repair.开放式与机器人辅助腹腔镜下腹膜后组件分离在复杂腹壁修复中的应用比较。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac057.
机器人辅助下的腹横肌释放术与开放式腹横肌释放术的比较:短期疗效比较。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1858-1. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
What Do We Know About Component Separation Techniques for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair?我们对腹壁疝修补的成分分离技术了解多少?
Front Surg. 2018 Mar 27;5:24. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00024. eCollection 2018.
5
Multicenter review of robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there a role for robotics?机器人与腹腔镜腹疝修补术的多中心回顾:机器人技术是否有作用?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1901-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5882-5. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Robotic and hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release may be performed with low length of stay and wound morbidity.机器人和杂交机器人腹横肌松解术可能具有较低的住院时间和伤口发病率。
Am J Surg. 2018 Mar;215(3):462-465. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.053. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release.机器人与开放腹横肌释放术的围手术期结果比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):840-845. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5752-1. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair.开放式与机器人经腹横肌平面松解在腹疝修补术中的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5729-0. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Reducing Length of Stay Using a Robotic-assisted Approach for Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: A Comparative Analysis From the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative.使用机器人辅助方法减少Retromuscular 腹疝修补术的住院时间:来自美洲疝学会质量合作组织的比较分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):210-217. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244.
10
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes.机器人辅助腹疝修补术:临床结局的多中心评估
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1342-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5118-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.