Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Mod Pathol. 2024 Aug;37(8):100528. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100528. Epub 2024 May 27.
Since 2017, a self-sampling device has been introduced to the Dutch population-based screening program to enable higher participation rates. However, routine triage cytology cannot be performed on self-sampling material. Methylation is an alternative triage method that can be performed directly on DNA extracted from self-samples. Recently, we tested a set of 15 published cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+)-specific methylation markers and found a panel of 3 markers with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 74%. In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of 2 commercial assays using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. DNA from the same cohort of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive self-sampled material obtained through the population-based screening program in the North of the Netherlands from women with CIN2 or less (<CIN3, n = 208) and women with CIN3+ (n = 96) was used. The QIAsure methylation test (consisting of 2 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 72%, whereas the Gyntect assay (consisting of 6 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 91% for CIN3+. When we compared all individual 23 methylation markers, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of ≥0.7 for 11 of 23 markers (P < .001). By model-based recursive partitioning and robustness analysis, we found a panel with a better sensitivity compared with QIAsure and Gyntect (P < .001). This new panel, consisting of ITGA4, ASCL1, and FAM19A4, has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 70%, similar to our previously identified panel (ANKRD18CP, LHX8, and EPB41L3). Thus, in addition to our previously identified panel, the combination of ITGA4, ASCL1, and FAM19A4 showed good diagnostic performance and potentially can replace cytology, thereby avoiding additional doctor visits for many women worldwide and reducing the time for decision making for referral to the gynecologist.
自 2017 年以来,一种自我采样设备已被引入荷兰基于人群的筛查计划,以提高参与率。然而,常规的分流细胞学检查不能用于自我采样材料。甲基化是一种替代的分流方法,可以直接在从自我样本中提取的 DNA 上进行。最近,我们测试了一组 15 个已发表的宫颈上皮内瘤变 3 级或更高级别(CIN3+)特异性甲基化标志物,发现了一组 3 个标志物,其敏感性为 82%,特异性为 74%。在这项研究中,我们使用定量甲基化特异性 PCR 来确定两种商业检测方法的敏感性和特异性。从荷兰北部基于人群的筛查计划中获得的高危人乳头瘤病毒阳性自我采样材料的同一队列中,使用来自 CIN2 或更低(<CIN3,n=208)和 CIN3+(n=96)的女性的 DNA。QIAsure 甲基化检测(包含 2 个甲基化标志物)的敏感性为 65%,特异性为 72%,而 Gyntect 检测(包含 6 个甲基化标志物)的敏感性为 59%,特异性为 91%用于 CIN3+。当我们比较所有单独的 23 个甲基化标志物时,接收者操作特征分析显示 23 个标志物中有 11 个的曲线下面积(AUC)≥0.7(P<0.001)。通过基于模型的递归分区和稳健性分析,我们发现与 QIAsure 和 Gyntect 相比,该面板具有更好的敏感性(P<0.001)。这个新的面板由 ITGA4、ASCL1 和 FAM19A4 组成,其敏感性为 84%,特异性为 70%,与我们之前确定的面板(ANKRD18CP、LHX8 和 EPB41L3)相似。因此,除了我们之前确定的面板外,ITGA4、ASCL1 和 FAM19A4 的组合表现出良好的诊断性能,并且可能可以替代细胞学检查,从而避免全球许多女性的额外就诊,并减少转介妇科医生的决策时间。