Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Sep;67(3):350-359. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 May 27.
Research has suggested that individual health may influence policy attitudes, yet the relationship between mental health and policy support is understudied. Clarifying this relationship may help inform policies that can improve the population mental health. To address this gap, this study measures national support for 5 social determinants of health policy priorities and their relation to mental health and political affiliation.
This study assessed support for 5 policy priorities related to the social determinants of health using a nationally representative survey of US adults (n=2,430) conducted in March-April 2023. Logistic regression was used to estimate the predicted probability of identifying each priority as important, test differences in support by self-rated mental health, and evaluate whether partisanship modified these relationships. Analyses were conducted in 2023.
The majority of US adults, across partisan identities, supported 5 policy priorities related to improving the economy (84%), healthcare affordability (77%), improving K-12 education (76%), housing affordability (68%), and childcare affordability (61%). Worse mental health predicted significantly greater support for addressing housing affordability (73.9% vs 66.2%), and partisanship modified the relationship between mental health and support for improving the economy, improving K-12 education, and housing affordability.
In 2023, there was substantial bipartisan support for federal policy action to address the social determinants of health, and worse mental health was related to greater policy support, particularly among Democrats. Federal policymakers have a broad consensus to take action to address the social determinants of health, which may improve the population mental health.
研究表明,个人健康状况可能会影响政策态度,但心理健康与政策支持之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。澄清这种关系可能有助于为改善人口心理健康状况的政策提供信息。为了解决这一差距,本研究衡量了公众对 5 项社会决定健康政策重点的支持程度,以及它们与心理健康和政治派别之间的关系。
本研究使用 2023 年 3 月至 4 月期间对美国成年人进行的全国代表性调查(n=2430),评估了与社会决定健康相关的 5 项政策重点的支持情况。使用逻辑回归估计确定每个优先事项为重要的预测概率,按自我报告的心理健康状况测试支持方面的差异,并评估党派是否改变了这些关系。分析于 2023 年进行。
大多数美国成年人,无论党派身份如何,都支持与改善经济(84%)、医保负担能力(77%)、改善 K-12 教育(76%)、住房负担能力(68%)和儿童保育负担能力(61%)相关的 5 项政策重点。更差的心理健康状况预测对解决住房负担能力的支持显著增加(73.9%比 66.2%),而党派关系改变了心理健康与支持改善经济、改善 K-12 教育和住房负担能力之间的关系。
2023 年,两党都强烈支持联邦政策行动来解决社会决定健康的因素,而更差的心理健康状况与更大的政策支持相关,尤其是在民主党人中。联邦政策制定者在采取行动解决社会决定健康的因素方面达成了广泛共识,这可能会改善人口心理健康状况。