Suppr超能文献

缩窄性心包炎患者心包切除术的结果和相关风险因素:来自中国的回顾性研究。

Outcomes and Risk Factors Associated with Pericardiectomy in Patients with Constrictive Pericarditis: A Retrospective Study from China.

机构信息

Cardiac Surgery Department, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;30(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00036.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment option for constrictive pericarditis and is associated with a high prevalence of morbidity and mortality. However, information on the associated outcomes and risk factors is limited. We aimed to report the mid-term outcomes of pericardiectomy from a single center in China.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients who underwent pericardiectomy at our institute from April 2018 to January 2023.

RESULTS

Eighty-six consecutive patients (average age, 46.1 ± 14.7 years; 68.6 men) underwent pericardiectomy through midline sternotomy. The most common etiology was idiopathic (n = 60, 69.8%), and 82 patients (95.3%) were in the New York Heart Association function class III/IV. In all, 32 (37.2%) patients underwent redo sternotomies, 36 (41.9%) underwent a concomitant procedure, and 39 (45.3%) required cardiopulmonary bypass. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.8%, and the 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 88.3% and 83.5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative mitral insufficiency (MI) ≥moderate (hazard ratio [HR], 6.435; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.655-25.009]; p = 0.007) and partial pericardiectomy (HR, 11.410; 95% CI [3.052-42.663]; p = 0.000) were associated with increased 5-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

Pericardiectomy remains a safe operation for constrictive pericarditis with optimal mid-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

心包切除术是缩窄性心包炎的确定性治疗选择,与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。然而,有关相关结局和危险因素的信息有限。我们旨在报告中国一家单中心的心包切除术的中期结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 4 月至 2023 年 1 月在我院接受心包切除术的患者数据。

结果

86 例连续患者(平均年龄 46.1 ± 14.7 岁;68.6 名男性)通过正中胸骨切开术行心包切除术。最常见的病因是特发性(n = 60,69.8%),82 例(95.3%)患者处于纽约心脏协会功能分级 III/IV 级。共有 32 例(37.2%)患者接受了再次胸骨切开术,36 例(41.9%)患者进行了联合手术,39 例(45.3%)需要体外循环。30 天死亡率为 5.8%,1 年和 5 年生存率分别为 88.3%和 83.5%。多变量分析显示,术前二尖瓣关闭不全(MI)≥中度(风险比 [HR],6.435;95%置信区间 [CI] [1.655-25.009];p = 0.007)和部分心包切除术(HR,11.410;95%CI [3.052-42.663];p = 0.000)与 5 年死亡率增加相关。

结论

心包切除术仍是缩窄性心包炎的安全手术,具有最佳的中期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验