Gatti Giuseppe, Fiore Antonio, Ternacle Julien, Porcari Aldostefano, Fiorica Ilaria, Poletti Angela, Ecarnot Fiona, Bussani Rossana, Pappalardo Aniello, Chocron Sidney, Folliguet Thierry, Perrotti Andrea
Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale Di Cattinara, Via P. Valdoni 7, 34148, Trieste, Italy.
Heart Vessels. 2020 Jan;35(1):92-103. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01464-4. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Predictors of early and late failure of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis (CP) have not been established. Early and late outcomes of a cumulative series of 81 (mean age 60 years; mean EuroSCORE II, 3.3%) consecutive patients from three European cardiac surgery centers were reviewed. Predictors of a combined endpoint comprising in-hospital death or major complications (including multiple transfusion) were identified with binary logistic regression. Non-parametric estimates of survival were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of poor late outcomes were established using Cox proportional hazard regression. There were 4 (4.9%) in-hospital deaths. Preoperative central venous pressure > 15 mmHg (p = 0.005) and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.016) were independent predictors of complicated in-hospital course, which occurred in 29 (35.8%) patients. During follow-up (median, 5.4 years), preoperative renal impairment was a predictor of all-cause death (p = 0.0041), cardiac death (p = 0.0008), as well as hospital readmission due to congestive heart failure (p = 0.0037); while partial pericardiectomy predicted all-cause death (p = 0.028) and concomitant cardiac operation predicted cardiac death (p = 0.026), postoperative central venous pressure < 10 mmHg was associated with a low risk both of all-cause and cardiac death (p < 0.0001 for both). Ten-year adjusted survival free of all-cause death, cardiac death, and hospital readmission were 76.9%, 94.7%, and 90.6%, respectively. In high-risk patients with CP, performing pericardiectomy before severe constriction develops and avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (when possible) could contribute to improving immediate outcomes post-surgery. Complete removal of cardiac constriction could enhance long-term outcomes.
缩窄性心包炎(CP)心包切除术早期和晚期失败的预测因素尚未确定。回顾了来自三个欧洲心脏外科中心的81例(平均年龄60岁;平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II,3.3%)连续患者的累积系列的早期和晚期结果。采用二元逻辑回归确定包括住院死亡或主要并发症(包括多次输血)的联合终点的预测因素。采用Kaplan-Meier方法获得生存的非参数估计。使用Cox比例风险回归确定晚期不良结局的预测因素。有4例(4.9%)住院死亡。术前中心静脉压>15 mmHg(p = 0.005)和使用体外循环(p = 0.016)是住院过程复杂的独立预测因素,29例(35.8%)患者出现这种情况。在随访期间(中位数,5.4年),术前肾功能损害是全因死亡(p = 0.0041)、心源性死亡(p = 0.0008)以及因充血性心力衰竭再次住院(p = 0.0037)的预测因素;而部分心包切除术可预测全因死亡(p = 0.028),同期心脏手术可预测心源性死亡(p = 0.026),术后中心静脉压<10 mmHg与全因死亡和心源性死亡的低风险相关(两者p<0.0001)。无全因死亡、心源性死亡和再次住院的10年调整生存率分别为76.9%、94.7%和90.6%。在CP高危患者中,在严重缩窄发生前进行心包切除术并尽可能避免体外循环,可能有助于改善术后即时结局。完全解除心脏缩窄可改善长期结局。