Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Surgery. 2024 Aug;176(2):414-419. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.026. Epub 2024 May 29.
A textbook outcome for the management of uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis is the targeted clinical scenario and is characterized by no recurrent biliary colic, absence of surgical and biliary complications, and absence or relief of abdominal pain. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of textbook outcomes after cholecystectomy and identify associated baseline factors.
Patients from 2 Dutch multicenter prospective trials between 2014 and 2019 (SECURE and SUCCESS trial) were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with textbook outcomes after cholecystectomy at 6-month follow-up. Regression analysis was used to identify which factors before surgery were associated with textbook outcomes.
A total of 1,124 patients underwent cholecystectomy. A textbook outcome at 6-month follow-up was reached in 67.9% of patients. Persistent abdominal pain was the main reason for the failure to achieve textbook outcome. Patients who did achieve textbook outcomes more often reported severe pain attacks (89.4% vs 81.7%, P < .001) and/or biliary colic (78.6% vs 68.4%, P < .001) at baseline compared with patients without textbook outcomes. The presence of biliary colic at baseline (odds ratio = 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.09, P = .003) and nausea/vomiting at baseline (odds ratio = 1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.74, P = .039) were associated with textbook outcome. The use of non-opioid analgesics (odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.99, P = .043) and pain frequency ≥1/month (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.73, P < .001) were negatively associated with textbook outcome.
Textbook outcome is achieved in two-thirds of patients who undergo cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis. Intensity and frequency of pain, presence of biliary colic, and nausea/vomiting at baseline are independently associated with achieving textbook outcomes. A more stringent selection of patients may optimize the textbook outcome rate in patients with uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis.
对于单纯性胆囊结石的治疗,教科书式的结果是有针对性的临床情况,其特征是无复发性胆绞痛、无手术和胆道并发症,以及腹痛消失或缓解。本研究旨在评估胆囊切除术后达到教科书式结果的发生率,并确定相关的基线因素。
纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年间荷兰两个多中心前瞻性试验(SECURE 和 SUCCESS 试验)中的患者。主要结局是在 6 个月随访时达到胆囊切除术后教科书式结果的患者比例。回归分析用于确定术前哪些因素与教科书式结果相关。
共 1124 例患者接受了胆囊切除术。67.9%的患者在 6 个月随访时达到了教科书式的结果。持续性腹痛是未能达到教科书式结果的主要原因。与没有达到教科书式结果的患者相比,达到教科书式结果的患者在基线时更常报告严重的疼痛发作(89.4%比 81.7%,P<0.001)和/或胆绞痛(78.6%比 68.4%,P<0.001)。基线时存在胆绞痛(比值比=1.56,95%置信区间:1.16-2.09,P=0.003)和恶心/呕吐(比值比=1.33,95%置信区间:1.01-1.74,P=0.039)与达到教科书式结果相关。使用非阿片类镇痛药(比值比=0.76,95%置信区间:0.58-0.99,P=0.043)和疼痛频率≥1/月(比值比=0.56,95%置信区间:0.43-0.73,P<0.001)与达到教科书式结果呈负相关。
对于单纯性胆囊结石患者,胆囊切除术的三分之二达到了教科书式的结果。疼痛的强度和频率、胆绞痛的存在以及基线时的恶心/呕吐与达到教科书式结果独立相关。对患者进行更严格的选择可能会优化单纯性胆囊结石患者的教科书式结果率。