• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项影响癌症患者日常生活中整合补充和综合医疗保健建议的因素的定性研究。

A Qualitative Investigation of Factors Influencing the Integration of Complementary and Integrative Healthcare Recommendations in the Daily Lives of Patients with Cancer.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241252195. doi: 10.1177/15347354241252195.

DOI:10.1177/15347354241252195
PMID:38812440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143848/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients diagnosed with cancer use complementary and integrative healthcare (CIH) approaches to manage their cancer- and treatment-related symptoms and improve their well-being. Evidence suggests that counseling on CIH can improve health outcomes and decrease healthcare costs by increasing patient activation. This qualitative study explores the experiences of cancer patients who underwent interprofessional counseling on CIH to gain insights into how these patients were able to integrate recommended CIH measures into their daily lives while undergoing conventional cancer treatment.

METHODS

Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients participating in the CCC-Integrativ study and its process evaluation. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using content analysis following Kuckartz and Rädiker. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to achieve a balanced sample regarding gender, age, cancer diagnosis, and treatment approach.

RESULTS

Most patients with cancer reported largely implementing the CIH recommendations. Participants acknowledged the efficacy of CIH recommendations in managing their symptoms. They felt strengthened and empowered to actively take part in their healthcare decisions. However, the patients encountered obstacles in incorporating the recommended CIH applications into their daily routines. These challenges encompassed the effort required for treatment application (e.g., baths, compresses), limitations imposed by the cancer disease (e.g., fatigue, pain), difficulties acquiring necessary materials, associated costs, and lack of infrastructure for CIH. Facilitators of CIH implementation included the availability of easily manageable CIH measures (e.g., herbal teas), informative materials on their application, distribution of samples, family support, and a high level of self-efficacy. The patient-centered approach and strong patient-provider partnership within the counseling context were perceived as empowering. Participants expressed a desire for a consistent point of contact to address their CIH concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the benefits of CIH counseling for cancer patients' symptom management and overall well-being. Healthcare professionals providing CIH counseling to patients with cancer may recognize the barriers identified to better support their patients in the regular use of CIH.

摘要

背景

许多被诊断患有癌症的患者使用补充和整合医疗保健(CIH)方法来管理他们的癌症和治疗相关症状,并提高他们的幸福感。有证据表明,对 CIH 的咨询可以通过提高患者的积极性来改善健康结果并降低医疗保健成本。这项定性研究探讨了接受 CIH 跨专业咨询的癌症患者的经验,以深入了解这些患者如何在接受常规癌症治疗的同时将推荐的 CIH 措施融入日常生活。

方法

对参与 CCC-Integrativ 研究及其过程评估的癌症患者进行了 40 次半结构化访谈。采访进行了录音,并逐字转录,然后使用 Kuckartz 和 Rädiker 的内容分析法进行分析。采用目的性抽样策略,在性别、年龄、癌症诊断和治疗方法方面实现了平衡的样本。

结果

大多数癌症患者报告说他们主要实施了 CIH 建议。参与者承认 CIH 建议在管理他们的症状方面的有效性。他们感到更有力量和能力积极参与他们的医疗保健决策。然而,患者在将推荐的 CIH 应用程序纳入他们的日常生活中遇到了障碍。这些挑战包括治疗应用程序所需的努力(例如,沐浴,压缩)、癌症疾病施加的限制(例如,疲劳,疼痛)、获取必要材料的困难、相关费用以及 CIH 的基础设施缺乏。CIH 实施的促进因素包括易于管理的 CIH 措施(例如,草药茶)的可用性、关于其应用的信息材料、样品的分发、家庭支持和高水平的自我效能。咨询背景下以患者为中心的方法和强大的医患伙伴关系被认为是赋权的。参与者表示希望有一个一致的联系点来解决他们的 CIH 问题。

结论

研究结果强调了 CIH 咨询对癌症患者症状管理和整体幸福感的益处。为癌症患者提供 CIH 咨询的医疗保健专业人员可能会认识到已确定的障碍,以更好地支持他们的患者定期使用 CIH。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e6/11143848/0179566da653/10.1177_15347354241252195-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e6/11143848/4f0d08dd542a/10.1177_15347354241252195-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e6/11143848/0179566da653/10.1177_15347354241252195-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e6/11143848/4f0d08dd542a/10.1177_15347354241252195-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e6/11143848/0179566da653/10.1177_15347354241252195-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Investigation of Factors Influencing the Integration of Complementary and Integrative Healthcare Recommendations in the Daily Lives of Patients with Cancer.一项影响癌症患者日常生活中整合补充和综合医疗保健建议的因素的定性研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241252195. doi: 10.1177/15347354241252195.
2
A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Patients' Perceptions of an Interprofessional Counseling Service on Complementary and Integrative Healthcare.癌症患者对补充和综合医疗保健的跨专业咨询服务的看法的定性分析。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Oct;34(12):1132-1146. doi: 10.1177/10497323241231530. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
3
Enhancing patient activation: a controlled implementation study of an interprofessional evidence-based counseling program for complementary and integrative healthcare in cancer patients ('CCC-Integrativ').增强患者的自我管理能力:一项针对癌症患者补充和综合医疗的跨专业循证咨询项目(“CCC-综合医疗”)的对照实施研究。
Front Med. 2024 Dec;18(6):1013-1025. doi: 10.1007/s11684-024-1097-z. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Counseling lifestyle medicine in oncology: A qualitative analysis of interprofessional patient-nurse-physician interactions.肿瘤学中的生活方式医学咨询:对跨专业患者 - 护士 - 医生互动的定性分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Oct;127:108352. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108352. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
5
Interprofessional evidence-based counselling programme for complementary and integrative healthcare in patients with cancer: study protocol for the controlled implementation study CCC-Integrativ.跨专业基于证据的癌症患者补充和整合医疗保健咨询方案:对照实施研究 CCC-Integrativ 的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e055076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055076.
6
Identifying Barriers to Implementing Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies in Rhode Island Health Care Systems: A Qualitative Approach.识别罗德岛医疗系统中实施补充与整合健康疗法的障碍:一种定性研究方法。
J Integr Complement Med. 2025 Feb;31(2):155-165. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0370. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
7
Garnering Support for Complementary and Integrative Health Implementation: A Qualitative Study of VA Healthcare Organization Leaders.为补充和整合健康实施争取支持:对 VA 医疗保健组织领导人的定性研究。
J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(S1):S81-S88. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0383.
8
Protocol for the process evaluation of a counselling intervention designed to educate cancer patients on complementary and integrative health care and promote interprofessional collaboration in this area (the CCC-Integrativ study).为一项旨在教育癌症患者关于补充和综合医疗保健并促进该领域跨专业合作的咨询干预措施进行的过程评估的方案(CCC-Integrativ 研究)。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268091. eCollection 2022.
9
Attitudes, Provider and Treatment Selection of Complementary and Integrative Health among Individuals with Pain-Related Conditions.疼痛相关疾病患者对补充和整合健康的态度、提供者选择和治疗选择。
Complement Ther Med. 2020 Jun;51:102410. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102410. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
Use of complementary and integrative health in cancer pain management among patients undergoing cancer treatments: a qualitative descriptive study.癌症治疗患者在癌症疼痛管理中使用补充和整合医学:一项定性描述性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):5147-5156. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06928-4. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to "A critical perspective on patient activation through integrative healthcare counselling in oncology", based on the "CCC-Integrativ" study.基于“CCC-Integrativ”研究对《肿瘤综合医疗咨询中患者激活的批判性视角》的回应
Front Med. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s11684-025-1153-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Patients' Perceptions of an Interprofessional Counseling Service on Complementary and Integrative Healthcare.癌症患者对补充和综合医疗保健的跨专业咨询服务的看法的定性分析。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Oct;34(12):1132-1146. doi: 10.1177/10497323241231530. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
2
Integrative oncology in cancer care - implementation factors: mixed-methods systematic review.癌症护理中的整合肿瘤学——实施因素:混合方法系统评价
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 May 12. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004150.
3
Patient activation, self-efficacy and usage of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients.
癌症患者的患者激活、自我效能和补充与替代医学的使用情况。
Med Oncol. 2022 Sep 7;39(12):192. doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01796-8.
4
Protocol for the process evaluation of a counselling intervention designed to educate cancer patients on complementary and integrative health care and promote interprofessional collaboration in this area (the CCC-Integrativ study).为一项旨在教育癌症患者关于补充和综合医疗保健并促进该领域跨专业合作的咨询干预措施进行的过程评估的方案(CCC-Integrativ 研究)。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268091. eCollection 2022.
5
Enhancing Outpatient Symptom Management in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis.增强头颈部癌症患者门诊症状管理:定性分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 1;148(4):333-341. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.4555.
6
Interprofessional evidence-based counselling programme for complementary and integrative healthcare in patients with cancer: study protocol for the controlled implementation study CCC-Integrativ.跨专业基于证据的癌症患者补充和整合医疗保健咨询方案:对照实施研究 CCC-Integrativ 的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e055076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055076.
7
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity participation in patients with head and neck cancer: a scoping review.头颈癌患者参与体育活动的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):4591-4601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06812-1. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
8
Patients' lived experiences and recommendations for enhanced awareness and use of integrative oncology services in cancer care.患者对提高对肿瘤治疗中整合肿瘤学服务的认识和使用的体验和建议。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2557-2561. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
9
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
10
Effects of training oncology physicians advising patients on complementary and integrative therapies on patient-reported outcomes: A multicenter, cluster-randomized trial.培训肿瘤医师为患者提供补充和综合疗法咨询对患者报告结局的影响:一项多中心、整群随机试验。
Cancer. 2021 Aug 1;127(15):2683-2692. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33562. Epub 2021 Apr 27.