• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤科医生使用诊断性基因表达谱检测指导患者管理的临床影响研究。

A clinical impact study of dermatologists' use of diagnostic gene expression profile testing to guide patient management.

作者信息

Witkowski Alexander, Jarell Abel D, Ahmed Kelli L, Siegel Jennifer J, Russell Brooke H, Rogers Jason H, Goldberg Matthew S, Fernandes Neil F, Ludzik Joanna, Farberg Aaron S

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Granite State Dermatology, PC, Portsmouth, NH, USA.

出版信息

Melanoma Manag. 2024 May 9;11(1):MMT68. doi: 10.2217/mmt-2023-0002. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2217/mmt-2023-0002
PMID:38812731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11131342/
Abstract

Cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms with diagnostic and/or clinical ambiguity pose patient management challenges. Six randomized case scenarios with diagnostic/clinical uncertainty were described with/without a benign or malignant diagnostic gene expression profile (GEP) result. Clinical impact was assessed by reporting the mean increase/decrease of management changes normalized to baseline (n = 32 dermatologists). Benign GEP results prompted clinicians to decrease surgical margins (84.2%). Malignant GEP results escalated surgical excision recommendations (100%). A majority (72.2%) reduced and nearly all (98.9%) increased follow-up frequency for benign or malignant GEP results, respectively. There was an overall increase in management plan confidence with GEP results. Diagnostic GEP tests help guide clinical decision-making in a variety of diagnostically ambiguous or clinicopathologically discordant scenarios.

摘要

具有诊断和/或临床不确定性的皮肤黑素细胞肿瘤给患者管理带来了挑战。描述了六个具有诊断/临床不确定性的随机病例场景,同时给出或未给出良性或恶性诊断基因表达谱(GEP)结果。通过报告相对于基线标准化的管理变化的平均增加/减少来评估临床影响(n = 32名皮肤科医生)。良性GEP结果促使临床医生减小手术切缘(84.2%)。恶性GEP结果使手术切除建议升级(100%)。对于良性或恶性GEP结果,大多数(72.2%)减少了随访频率,几乎所有(98.9%)增加了随访频率。GEP结果总体上提高了管理计划的信心。诊断性GEP检测有助于在各种诊断不明确或临床病理不一致的情况下指导临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/076928279aa9/IMMT_A_2339765_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/bac481fcefbf/IMMT_A_2339765_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/07bf51bc028f/IMMT_A_2339765_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/11131859b9c2/IMMT_A_2339765_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/076928279aa9/IMMT_A_2339765_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/bac481fcefbf/IMMT_A_2339765_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/07bf51bc028f/IMMT_A_2339765_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/11131859b9c2/IMMT_A_2339765_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/11131342/076928279aa9/IMMT_A_2339765_F0004_C.jpg

相似文献

1
A clinical impact study of dermatologists' use of diagnostic gene expression profile testing to guide patient management.皮肤科医生使用诊断性基因表达谱检测指导患者管理的临床影响研究。
Melanoma Manag. 2024 May 9;11(1):MMT68. doi: 10.2217/mmt-2023-0002. eCollection 2024.
2
A Physician's Guide to the Use of Gene Expression Profile Ancillary Diagnostic Testing for Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms.皮肤黑素细胞肿瘤基因表达谱辅助诊断检测使用的医师指南
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2023 Apr;16(4):12-20.
3
Management Decisions Made by Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Patients: Impact of a 31-Gene Expression Profile Test.医师助理和执业护士对皮肤恶性黑色素瘤患者做出的管理决策:一项31基因表达谱检测的影响
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Nov 1;17(11):1220-1223.
4
Impact of a 31-gene Expression Profiling Test for Cutaneous Melanoma on Dermatologists' Clinical Management Decisions.一项针对皮肤黑色素瘤的31基因表达谱检测对皮肤科医生临床管理决策的影响。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 May 1;16(5):428-431.
5
Expanded evidence that the 31-gene expression profile test provides clinical utility for melanoma management in a multicenter study.在一项多中心研究中,有更多证据表明 31 基因表达谱检测可用于黑色素瘤的临床管理。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Aug;38(8):1267-1274. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2033560. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Factors Affecting Dermatologists' Use of a 31-Gene Expression Profiling Test as an Adjunct for Predicting Metastatic Risk in Cutaneous Melanoma.影响皮肤科医生使用31基因表达谱检测作为预测皮肤黑色素瘤转移风险辅助手段的因素。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 May 1;17(5):544-547.
7
Impact of Gene Expression Profile Testing on the Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists.基因表达谱检测对皮肤科医生管理鳞状细胞癌的影响。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2019 Oct 1;18(10):980-984.
8
Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.用于诊断成人皮肤癌的远程皮肤病学。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013193. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013193.
9
Early Detection and Prognostic Assessment of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus on Optimal Practice and the Role of Gene Expression Profile Testing.皮肤黑色素瘤的早期检测和预后评估:最佳实践的共识以及基因表达谱测试的作用。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 May 1;159(5):545-553. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0127.
10
Role of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Analysis of Melanocytic Lesions.体内反射共聚焦显微镜在黑素细胞性病变分析中的作用
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Apr;26(1):64-67.

本文引用的文献

1
Concordance of reflectance confocal microscopy and gene expression profiling for melanocytic lesions with uncertain malignant potential: A case series.对可疑恶性黑色素瘤病变的反射共聚焦显微镜与基因表达谱的一致性:病例系列。
J Cutan Pathol. 2023 Jul;50(7):623-628. doi: 10.1111/cup.14422. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Combined Use of Dermoscopy, Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Ex-Vivo Gene Expression Profiling to Detect a Micro-Melanoma Less Than 1 mm in Diameter.联合使用皮肤镜、反射式共聚焦显微镜和体外基因表达谱检测直径小于1毫米的微小黑色素瘤
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):e2023055. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1301a55.
3
Clinical management of melanocytic tumours of uncertain malignant potential (MelTUMPs), including melanocytomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
不确定恶性潜能的黑素细胞肿瘤(MelTUMPs),包括黑素细胞瘤的临床处理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 May;37(5):859-870. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18665. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Malignant melanoma test results by a commercial 35-gene expression test are enriched for benign or atypical Spitz tumors.通过一项商业化的35基因表达检测得出的恶性黑色素瘤检测结果中,良性或非典型斯皮茨肿瘤的比例偏高。
J Cutan Pathol. 2022 Dec;49(12):1009-1011. doi: 10.1111/cup.14312. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Effect of Prior Diagnoses on Dermatopathologists' Interpretations of Melanocytic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.先诊断对皮肤科医生解读黑素细胞病变的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Sep 1;158(9):1040-1047. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2932.
6
Do we need to rethink the diagnoses melanoma in situ and severely dysplastic naevus?我们是否需要重新思考原位黑素瘤和重度发育异常痣的诊断?
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Jun;186(6):1030-1032. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21010. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
7
Appropriate use criteria for ancillary diagnostic testing in dermatopathology: New recommendations for 11 tests and 220 clinical scenarios from the American Society of Dermatopathology Appropriate Use Criteria Committee.皮肤科辅助诊断检测的合理应用标准:美国皮肤病理学会合理应用标准委员会针对 11 项检测和 220 个临床情况提出的新建议。
J Cutan Pathol. 2022 Mar;49(3):231-245. doi: 10.1111/cup.14135. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
Communication Between Dermatologists and Dermatopathologists via the Pathology Requisition: Opportunities to Improve Patient Care.皮肤科医生与皮肤病理学家通过病理检查申请单进行沟通:改善患者护理的机会。
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 1;157(9):1033-1034. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2582.
9
Clinical Use of a Diagnostic Gene Expression Signature for Melanocytic Neoplasms.用于黑素细胞肿瘤的诊断基因表达特征的临床应用。
Cutis. 2021 May;107(5):264-269. doi: 10.12788/cutis.0254.
10
The WHO 2018 Classification of Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms: Suggestions From Routine Practice.《世界卫生组织2018年皮肤黑素细胞肿瘤分类:来自日常实践的建议》
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 2;11:675296. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675296. eCollection 2021.