Zhang Jinwei, Hu Shuchen, Liu Xingyu, Liu Xiaoyong, Zhang Jieqiong, Yang Caijun, Fang Yu
Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 15;15:1397784. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1397784. eCollection 2024.
High prices, as a main factor, contributed to the lack of adequate access to essential anticancer medicines, especially for patients in developing countries. The Chinese Government has introduced a series of policies to control the prices of medicines during the last decade, but the effect on anticancer medicine is not yet clear.
To evaluate the time trends and regional variation in the price of essential anticancer medicines in China, we used the procurement data of anticancer medicines from 2015 to 2022. We selected 29 anticancer medicines from the 2018 Chinese National Essential Medicines List. To measure the cost of a medicine, we used defined daily dose cost -the cost per defined daily doses. At national level, we focused on the price changes over time and compared the price between medicine categories. At provincial level, we assessed price variation among provinces over time.
For prices at the national level, all 6 targeted medicines exhibited a continuous decrease trend in price. Out of 23 non-targeted medicines, 4 (17·39%) experienced continuous increases in prices, and 9 (39·13%) showed price decreases from 2015 to 2019 and then an upward trend during 2019-2022; Of the remaining non-targeted medicines, 7 (30·43%) had continuous price decreases and 3 (13.04%) had price increases followed by decreases. For prices at the provincial level, provincial price variation became smaller for almost all targeted medicines, except rituximab; for 11 out of 23 non-targeted medicines, provincial price variations became larger. During the study period, the proportion of price-increased medicines in each province was geographically correlated, and no significant relationship between prices and GDP was observed for both targeted and non-targeted anticancer medicines.
The prices and regional disparity of most targeted anticancer medicines were decreasing, while for nearly half of the non-targeted anticancer medicines, the prices were increasing and the regional disparity became wider, which may lead to compromised access to these essential anticancer medicines and raise inequity health outcome among regions.
高价格是导致基本抗癌药物供应不足的主要因素,尤其影响了发展中国家的患者。在过去十年中,中国政府出台了一系列药品价格管控政策,但这些政策对抗癌药物的影响尚不明朗。
为评估中国基本抗癌药物价格的时间趋势和地区差异,我们使用了2015年至2022年的抗癌药物采购数据。我们从2018年《中国国家基本药物目录》中选取了29种抗癌药物。为衡量药物成本,我们采用限定日剂量成本——每限定日剂量的成本。在国家层面,我们关注价格随时间的变化,并比较不同药物类别的价格。在省级层面,我们评估了各省价格随时间的变化情况。
在国家层面的价格方面,所有6种目标药物价格均呈持续下降趋势。在23种非目标药物中,4种(17.39%)价格持续上涨,9种(39.13%)在2015年至2019年价格下降,然后在2019年至2022年呈上升趋势;其余非目标药物中,7种(30.43%)价格持续下降,3种(13.04%)价格先上涨后下降。在省级层面的价格方面,除利妥昔单抗外,几乎所有目标药物的省级价格差异都变小了;23种非目标药物中有11种的省级价格差异变大。在研究期间,各省价格上涨药物的比例存在地理相关性,目标和非目标抗癌药物的价格与国内生产总值均未观察到显著关系。
大多数目标抗癌药物的价格和地区差异在减小,而近一半的非目标抗癌药物价格在上涨,地区差异扩大,这可能导致这些基本抗癌药物的可及性受损,并加剧地区间的健康不平等状况。