Smith Nathan Edward Charles
Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mycology. 2023 Dec 25;15(2):137-143. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2023.2295412. eCollection 2024.
This paper discusses the interaction between two substantial debates in taxonomy and nomenclature: The potential introduction of DNA-only types into fungal taxonomy and whether certain species names are offensive and should be changed. It argues that the acceptance of DNA sequences as types will likely lead to a proliferation of eponyms (species named after a person or persons) and that this will render them more likely to censure thus creating a point of instability in the fungal nomenclature. More fundamentally, it seeks to highlight the cultural and aesthetic attraction of names and to promote wider conversation on why we consider the Latin binomial central in our description of species.
仅将DNA类型引入真菌分类学的可能性,以及某些物种名称是否具有冒犯性并应予以更改。文章认为,接受DNA序列作为类型可能会导致以人命名的物种(以一个人或多个人命名的物种)大量增加,这将使它们更有可能受到审查,从而在真菌命名法中造成不稳定因素。更根本的是,它旨在突出名称的文化和美学吸引力,并推动关于为何我们认为拉丁双名法在物种描述中至关重要的更广泛讨论。