Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Jul 1;137(1):125-135. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00002.2024. Epub 2024 May 30.
Peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity (PHC) is assessed as the change in ventilation in response to a rapid change in carbon dioxide pressures (Pco). The increase in chemoresponse from rest to subrespiratory compensation point (RCP) exercise intensities is well-defined but less clear at intensities above the RCP when changes in known ventilatory stimulants occur. Twenty healthy subjects ( = 10 females) completed a maximal exercise test on 1 day, and on a subsequent day, transient hypercapnia was used to test PHC at multiple exercise stages. The transient hypercapnia involved two breaths of 10% CO repeated five times during each of the following: sitting at rest on the cycle ergometer, cycling at 40% wmax, cycling at 85% Wmax, at rest on the cycle ergometer immediately following the 85% stage, and cycling at 40% Wmax again following the postexercise rest. The PHC was not different across exercise intensities (0.98 ± 0.37 vs. 0.91 ± 0.39 vs. 0.92 ± 0.42 L·min·mmHg for first 40% wmax, 85% wmax and second 40% Wmax, respectively ( = 0.45). There were no differences in PHC between presupra-RCP exercise rest and postsupra-RCP exercise rest (0.52 ± 0.23 vs. 0.53 ± 0.24 L·min·mmHg, = 0.8003). Using a repeated-measures correlation to account for within-participant changes, there was a significant relationship between the end-tidal Pco and PHC for the 85% intensity ( = 0.5, < 0.0001) when end-tidal Pco was dynamic between the trials. We conclude that the physiological changes (e.g., metabolic milieu and temperature) produced with supra-RCP exercise do not further augment PHC, and that the prestimulus end-tidal Pco modulates the PHC. Exercise at intensities above the respiratory compensation point did not further augment peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity (PHC). Moreover, the PHC was not different during a preexercise resting state compared with rest immediately after intense exercise. The lack of differences across both comparisons suggests that exercise itself appears to sensitize the PHC.
外周化学感受性高反应性(PHC)评估为二氧化碳分压(Pco)快速变化时通气的变化。从休息到亚呼吸补偿点(RCP)运动强度的化学感受性增加是明确的,但在 RCP 以上的强度时,当已知的通气刺激发生变化时,情况就不那么清楚了。20 名健康受试者(= 10 名女性)在一天内完成了最大运动测试,在随后的一天中,使用短暂性高碳酸血症在多个运动阶段测试 PHC。短暂性高碳酸血症包括在以下情况下重复五次的 10% CO 的两次呼吸:在自行车测功计上静坐休息,以 40% wmax 骑行,以 85% Wmax 骑行,在 85% 阶段后立即在自行车测功计上休息,以及在运动后休息后再次以 40% Wmax 骑行。PHC 在运动强度之间没有差异(第一 40% wmax、85% wmax 和第二 40% Wmax 时分别为 0.98 ± 0.37 与 0.91 ± 0.39 与 0.92 ± 0.42 L·min·mmHg(= 0.45))。在 RCP 运动前休息和 RCP 运动后休息之间,PHC 没有差异(0.52 ± 0.23 与 0.53 ± 0.24 L·min·mmHg,= 0.8003)。使用重复测量相关性来解释个体内变化,当试验之间的呼气末 Pco 是动态的时,85%强度的终末 Pco 与 PHC 之间存在显著关系(= 0.5,< 0.0001)。我们得出的结论是,RCP 以上运动产生的生理变化(例如代谢环境和温度)不会进一步增强 PHC,并且刺激前的呼气末 Pco 调节 PHC。运动强度高于呼吸补偿点不会进一步增强外周化学感受性高反应性(PHC)。此外,与剧烈运动后立即休息相比,运动前休息状态下的 PHC 没有差异。这两个比较都没有差异表明,运动本身似乎使 PHC 更加敏感。