• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国外科学教育与培训蓝带委员会 II 报告及建议:2024 年

The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024.

机构信息

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2024 Oct 1;280(4):535-546. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360. Epub 2024 May 29.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360
PMID:38814074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379355/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges.

BACKGROUND

The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education.

METHODS

BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as ≥80% agreement among the panel. Cronbach α was computed to assess the internal consistency of 3 Delphi rounds.

RESULTS

Of the 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# of consensus recommendation/# of proposed): Workforce (1/5); Medical Student Education (3/8); Work Life Integration (4/6); Resident Education (5/7); Goals, Structure, and Financing of Training (5/8); Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6); Research Training (7/9); and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3.

CONCLUSIONS

BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor, and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.

摘要

目的

一个专家小组根据当代挑战的影响提出了优化外科教育和培训的建议。

背景

首届蓝带委员会(BRC I)于 2004 年提出了全面的外科教育和培训建议。鉴于这些发现,成立了第二个 BRC(BRC II),考虑到医学教育的当前格局,提出了优化外科培训的建议。

方法

BRC II 是一个由 67 名专家组成的小组,他们是根据在外科教育和培训方面的经验和领导能力挑选出来的。它分为小组委员会,这些小组委员会在一年的时间里通过虚拟方式开会。他们根据重点领域制定了建议,并与指导委员会一起提出,然后向整个 BRC II 提交。选择 Delphi 方法来获得共识,共识定义为小组中≥80%的人同意。计算 Cronbach α 以评估 3 轮 Delphi 的内部一致性。

结果

在 50 项建议中,有 31 项在以下方面达成了共识外科培训 (# 共识建议/# 建议):劳动力 (1/5);医学生教育 (3/8);工作生活整合 (4/6);住院医师教育 (5/7);培训的目标、结构和融资 (5/8);教育支持和教师发展 (5/6);研究培训 (7/9);和教育技术和评估 (1/1)。在第 1 轮和第 2 轮,内部一致性良好,第 3 轮可以接受。

结论

BRC II 使用 Delphi 方法确定并推荐了 2024 年外科教育的 31 项优先事项。我们建议成立一个多学科的外科教育小组来监督、监测和促进这些建议的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a3/11379355/26c4a612c8c1/sla-280-535-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a3/11379355/8875c3e3dd73/sla-280-535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a3/11379355/26c4a612c8c1/sla-280-535-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a3/11379355/8875c3e3dd73/sla-280-535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a3/11379355/26c4a612c8c1/sla-280-535-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024.美国外科学教育与培训蓝带委员会 II 报告及建议:2024 年
Ann Surg. 2024 Oct 1;280(4):535-546. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Introduction to the Contemporary Assessment and Recommendations to Enhance Surgical Education and Training: Reports of the Subcommittees of the Blue Ribbon Committee II.当代评估简介及加强外科教育与培训的建议:蓝带委员会II小组委员会报告
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):1-2. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006495. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee II for the Optimization of Surgical Education and Training in the United States: The Surgical Trainee Perspective.美国蓝丝带委员会II关于优化外科教育与培训的建议:外科实习生视角
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):40-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006483. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Surgery and Surgical Training Before Graduate Medical Education: A Blue Ribbon Committee II, Medical Student Education Subcommittee Report.研究生医学教育前的外科手术与外科培训:蓝带委员会II,医学生教育小组委员会报告。
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):7-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006455. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Blue Ribbon Committee I Review: Findings and Impact.蓝丝带委员会 I 审查:调查结果与影响
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):3-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006362. Epub 2024 May 24.
6
Blue Ribbon Committee II: Reports of the Subcommittees on the Optimization of Surgical Education and Training in the US Work-Life Integration, Resilience, and Wellness.蓝丝带委员会二:美国手术教育与培训优化小组委员会关于工作与生活融合、适应力和健康的报告。
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):11-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006499. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
7
Key Issues in Surgical Residency Education: Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon II Committee Residency Education Subcommittee.外科住院医师培训教育的关键问题:蓝丝带二号委员会住院医师培训教育小组委员会的建议
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):16-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006434. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
Opportunities and Applications of Educational Technologies in Surgical Education and Assessment.教育技术在外科教育与评估中的机遇及应用
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):34-39. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006367. Epub 2024 May 29.
9
Building a Framework for Self-Regulated Learning in Surgical Education: A Delphi Consensus Among Experts in Surgical Education.构建外科教育中自我调节学习的框架:外科教育专家的德尔菲共识
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e56-e65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
10
Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement.人工智能在机器人外科手术培训中的伦理问题:德尔菲共识声明。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):613-622. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[Entrustable professional activities-A paradigm shift in the surgical training from quantity to quality].[可托付专业活动——外科培训从数量到质量的范式转变]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02370-4.

本文引用的文献

1
It Takes an Average of 17 Years for Evidence to Change Practice-the Burgeoning Field of Implementation Science Seeks to Speed Things Up.证据改变实践平均需要17年——新兴的实施科学领域试图加快这一进程。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 25;329(16):1333-1336. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4387.
2
Cultural Competency Curricula in US Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.美国研究生医学教育中的文化能力课程:范围综述。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Feb;14(1):37-52. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00414.1.
3
A contemporary reassessment of the US surgical workforce through 2050 predicts continued shortages and increased productivity demands.
通过 2050 年对美国外科医生劳动力的当代重新评估预测,未来将继续短缺,并对提高生产力提出更高的要求。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jan;223(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.033. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
4
Discrimination, Abuse, Harassment, and Burnout in Surgical Residency Training.外科住院医师培训中的歧视、虐待、骚扰和倦怠。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1741-1752. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1903759. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
Delivering on the promise of competency based medical education - an institutional approach.兑现基于能力的医学教育的承诺——一种机构层面的方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e28-e38. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Burnout and Stress Among US Surgery Residents: Psychological Distress and Resilience.美国外科住院医师的倦怠和压力:心理困扰和韧性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jan;226(1):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
7
Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.德尔菲研究在姑息治疗中的实施和报告指南(CREDES):基于方法学系统评价的建议。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):684-706. doi: 10.1177/0269216317690685. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
8
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
9
Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform with general surgery patient outcomes and with resident examination performance.2011 年 ACGME 住院医师勤务时间改革与普通外科患者结局和住院医师考试表现的关联。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2374-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15277.
10
Issues in general surgery residency training--2012.普通外科住院医师培训中的问题——2012年
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):553-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826bf98c.