Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Water Res. 2024 Aug 1;259:121818. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121818. Epub 2024 May 23.
Bioretention cells (BRCs) control stormwater flow on-site during precipitation, reducing runoff and improving water quality through chemical, physical, and biological processes. While BRCs are effective in these aspects, they provide habitats for wildlife and may face microbial hazards from fecal shedding, posing a potential threat to human health and the nearby environment. However, limited knowledge exists regarding the ability to control microbial hazards (e.g., beyond using typical indicator bacteria) through stormwater biofiltration. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to characterize changes in the bacterial community of urban stormwater undergoing bioretention treatment, with the goal of assessing the public health implications of these green infrastructure solutions. Samples from BRC inflow and outflow in Columbus, Ohio, were collected post-heavy storms from October 2021 to March 2022. Conventional culture-based E. coli monitoring and microbial source tracking (MST) were conducted to identify major fecal contamination extent and its sources (i.e., human, canine, avian, and ruminant). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was utilized to quantify the level of host-associated fecal contamination in addition to three antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs): tetracycline resistance gene (tetQ), sulfonamide resistance gene (sul1), and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase resistance gene (bla). Subsequently, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was conducted to characterize bacterial community differences between stormwater BRC inflow and outflow. Untreated urban stormwater reflects anthropogenic contamination, suggesting it as a potential source of contamination to waterbodies and urban environments. When comparing inlet and outlet BRC samples, urban stormwater treated via biofiltration did not increase microbial hazards, and changes in bacterial taxa and alpha diversity were negligible. Beta diversity results reveal a significant shift in bacterial community structure, while simultaneously enhancing the water quality (i.e., reduction of metals, total suspended solids, total nitrogen) of urban stormwater. Significant correlations were found between the bacterial community diversity of urban stormwater with fecal contamination (e.g. dog) and ARG (sul1), rainfall intensity, and water quality (hardness, total phosphorous). The study concludes that bioretention technology can sustainably maintain urban microbial water quality without posing additional public health risks, making it a viable green infrastructure solution for heavy rainfall events exacerbated by climate change.
生物滞留池(BRC)在降水期间控制现场的雨水流量,通过化学、物理和生物过程减少径流并改善水质。虽然 BRC 在这些方面很有效,但它们为野生动物提供了栖息地,并且可能面临粪便脱落带来的微生物危害,对人类健康和附近环境构成潜在威胁。然而,对于通过雨水生物过滤来控制微生物危害(例如,超越使用典型的指示菌)的能力,人们的了解有限。因此,本研究的目的是描述经过生物滞留处理的城市雨水的细菌群落变化,目的是评估这些绿色基础设施解决方案对公共健康的影响。本研究于 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月在俄亥俄州哥伦布市的 BRC 入流和出流处采集了暴雨后的样本。进行了常规的基于培养的大肠杆菌监测和微生物来源追踪(MST),以确定主要的粪便污染程度及其来源(即人类、犬类、鸟类和反刍动物)。利用液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)来定量除三种抗生素抗性基因(tetQ、sul1 和 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase resistance gene [bla])之外的宿主相关粪便污染的水平。随后,进行了 16S rRNA 基因测序,以描述雨水 BRC 入流和出流之间的细菌群落差异。未经处理的城市雨水反映了人为污染,表明它是水体和城市环境污染的潜在来源。当比较入口和出口 BRC 样本时,经过生物过滤处理的城市雨水并没有增加微生物危害,并且细菌分类群和 alpha 多样性的变化可以忽略不计。beta 多样性结果表明细菌群落结构发生了显著变化,同时提高了城市雨水的水质(即金属、总悬浮固体、总氮的减少)。城市雨水的细菌群落多样性与粪便污染(例如狗)和抗生素抗性基因(sul1)、降雨强度和水质(硬度、总磷)之间存在显著相关性。研究得出结论,生物滞留技术可以在不增加额外公共健康风险的情况下可持续地维持城市微生物水质,是应对气候变化加剧的暴雨事件的可行的绿色基础设施解决方案。