• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟康唑和左氧氟沙星预防方案对于预防化疗的急性髓系白血病患者的感染无效。

Fluconazole and levofloxacin prophylaxis are ineffective strategies for preventing infections in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy.

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil; Tumour Biomarkers and Osteoimmunology Laboratory, Av. Pará - 1720 - Block 6T, Room 07 - District Umuarama, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;91:102593. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102593. Epub 2024 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2024.102593
PMID:38815484
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia patients are at high risk for infections, which contribute to increased mortality rates of up to 70%. The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis has been shown to significantly lower rates of infection. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of two agents that showed effective results in the literature, levofloxacin and fluconazole, as prophylaxis strategies in AML patients.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 85 AML patients' medical records treated with a 7+3 induction chemotherapy protocol in the Cancer Hospital of Uberlândia from 2017 to 2021 were screened and their data was collected. Within these patients, groups for analysis were created based on whether the acting physician included an antibacterial or antifungal prophylaxis protocol during induction. Contingency tables with χ² and odds ratio tests were realized to verify associations between prophylaxis and infection. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves with Cox regression were developed to analyze survival.

RESULTS

The use of prophylaxis with either fluconazole or levofloxacin did not lower rates of infection, as those who with prophylaxis did not demonstrate significant differences when compared to those without (20.3-29.7%, and 12.3-23.3%, respectively). Patients who suffered a bacterial infection during induction were shown to have lower overall survival, with a similar trend seen in fungal infections.

CONCLUSION

Bacterial and fungal infections were associated with higher rates of induction mortality and lower overall survival, and prophylaxis using fluconazole and levofloxacin did not present any significant difference in preventing these infections in this study, contrasting results found in the literature. The individuality of each treatment center should be taken into consideration and future studies should be realized to better determine the most effective methods and agents for prophylaxis.

摘要

简介

急性髓系白血病患者感染风险高,死亡率高达 70%。抗菌预防已被证明可显著降低感染率。因此,本回顾性研究旨在评估两种在文献中显示有效结果的药物,左氧氟沙星和氟康唑,作为 AML 患者预防策略的效果。

方法

筛选了 2017 年至 2021 年在 Uberlândia 癌症医院接受 7+3 诱导化疗方案治疗的 85 名 AML 患者的病历,并收集了他们的数据。在这些患者中,根据诱导期主治医生是否包含抗菌或抗真菌预防方案,创建了分析组。通过 χ²和优势比检验实现了列联表,以验证预防与感染之间的关联。此外,还开发了 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归来分析生存情况。

结果

使用氟康唑或左氧氟沙星预防均未降低感染率,因为与未预防的患者相比,预防组的感染率无显著差异(分别为 20.3-29.7%和 12.3-23.3%)。在诱导期间发生细菌感染的患者总体生存率较低,真菌感染也有类似趋势。

结论

细菌和真菌感染与诱导死亡率较高和总体生存率较低相关,氟康唑和左氧氟沙星预防在本研究中并未显示在预防这些感染方面有任何显著差异,与文献中的结果相反。应考虑每个治疗中心的个体差异,并应开展未来的研究,以更好地确定预防的最有效方法和药物。

相似文献

1
Fluconazole and levofloxacin prophylaxis are ineffective strategies for preventing infections in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy.氟康唑和左氧氟沙星预防方案对于预防化疗的急性髓系白血病患者的感染无效。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;91:102593. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102593. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Decreased invasive fungal disease but no impact on overall survival by posaconazole compared to fluconazole prophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study in patients receiving induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndromes.泊沙康唑与氟康唑预防用药相比,侵袭性真菌病减少,但对总生存期无影响:一项针对接受急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征诱导治疗患者的回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Haematol. 2016 Feb;96(2):175-80. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12565. Epub 2015 May 6.
3
Liposomal amphotericin B versus the combination of fluconazole and itraconazole as prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections during induction chemotherapy for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.脂质体两性霉素B与氟康唑和伊曲康唑联合用药作为急性髓性白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征患者诱导化疗期间侵袭性真菌感染预防用药的比较
Cancer. 2003 Jan 15;97(2):450-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11094.
4
SEIFEM 2010-E: economic evaluation of posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving induction chemotherapy.SEIFEM 2010-E:泊沙康唑用于接受诱导化疗的急性髓系白血病患者抗真菌预防的经济学评价
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Dec;58(12):2859-2864. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1318438. Epub 2017 May 16.
5
Efficacy of anti-fungal but not anti-bacterial prophylaxis in intensive primary AML therapy: a real-world, retrospective comparative single-centre study.强化原发性急性髓系白血病治疗中抗真菌而非抗细菌预防的疗效:一项真实世界、回顾性比较单中心研究
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Jul 23;144:w13985. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13985. eCollection 2014.
6
Cost-benefit Analysis of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole as a Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in High-risk Hematologic Patients: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.泊沙康唑与氟康唑或伊曲康唑作为高危血液病患者一线抗真菌预防用药的成本效益分析:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Clin Ther. 2015 Sep;37(9):2019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Impact of fluconazole versus posaconazole prophylaxis on the incidence of fungal infections in patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.氟康唑与泊沙康唑预防用药对接受急性髓系白血病诱导化疗患者真菌感染发生率的影响
Biomed J. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):235-43. doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.143491.
8
Failure of fluconazole prophylaxis to reduce mortality or the requirement of systemic amphotericin B therapy during treatment for refractory acute myeloid leukemia: results of a prospective randomized phase III study. German AML Cooperative Group.氟康唑预防用药未能降低难治性急性髓细胞白血病治疗期间的死亡率或全身性两性霉素B治疗需求:一项前瞻性随机III期研究结果。德国AML协作组
Cancer. 1998 Jul 15;83(2):291-301.
9
No difference between posaconazole and fluconazole antifungal prophylaxis and mycological diagnostics except costs in patients undergoing AML chemotherapy: a 1-year "real-life" evaluation.泊沙康唑与氟康唑在接受急性髓系白血病化疗患者中的抗真菌预防及真菌学诊断效果无差异,仅成本有别:一项为期1年的“真实世界”评估
Ann Hematol. 2014 Jan;93(1):165-7. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1854-6. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
10
Effect of Caspofungin vs Fluconazole Prophylaxis on Invasive Fungal Disease Among Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.卡泊芬净与氟康唑预防方案对急性髓系白血病儿童和青年患者侵袭性真菌感染的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 5;322(17):1673-1681. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.15702.