• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解华盛顿州肺癌筛查低参与度的两步法:患者出行时间和影像学站点医疗可及性的地理空间分析。

Understanding Washington State's Low Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening in Two Steps: A Geospatial Analysis of Patient Travel Time and Health Care Availability of Imaging Sites.

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology Clinic, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA.

Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology Clinic, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.021
PMID:38815622
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of lung cancer reduces cancer mortality; yet uptake for lung cancer screening (LCS) has been limited in Washington State. Geographic disparities contribute to low uptake, but do not wholly explain gaps in access for underserved populations. Other factors, such as an adequate workforce to meet population demand and the capacity of accredited screening facility sites, must also be considered.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What proportion of the eligible population for LCS has access to LCS facilities in Washington State?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We used the enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) model to evaluate how geographic accessibility in addition to availability of LCS imaging centers contribute to disparities. We used available data on radiologic technologist volume at each American College of Radiology (ACR)-accredited screening facility site to estimate the capacity of each site to meet potential population demand. Spearman rank correlation coefficients of the spatial access ratios were compared with the 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and area deprivation index quintiles to identify characteristics of populations at risk for lung cancer with greater and lesser levels of access.

RESULTS

A total of 549 radiologic technologists were identified across the 95 ACR-accredited screening facilities. We observed that 95% of the eligible population had proximate geographic access to any ACR facility. However, when we incorporated the E2SFCA method, we found significant variation of access for eligible populations. The inclusion of the availability measure attenuated access for most of the eligible population. Furthermore, we observed that rural areas were substantially correlated, and areas with greater socioeconomic disadvantage were modestly correlated, with lower access.

INTERPRETATION

Rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas face significant disparities. The E2SFCA models demonstrated that capacity is an important component and how geographic access and availability jointly contribute to disparities in access to LCS.

摘要

背景

早期发现肺癌可降低癌症死亡率;然而,华盛顿州的肺癌筛查(LCS)参与率有限。地理差异导致参与率低,但并不能完全解释服务不足人群获得机会的差距。其他因素,如满足人口需求的足够劳动力以及认证筛查机构地点的能力,也必须考虑在内。

研究问题

有多少符合 LCS 条件的人口可以获得华盛顿州的 LCS 设施?

研究设计和方法

我们使用增强型两步浮动集水区(E2SFCA)模型来评估地理可达性以及 LCS 成像中心的可用性如何促成差异。我们利用每个美国放射学院 (ACR) 认证筛查机构地点的放射技师数量的可用数据来估计每个地点满足潜在人口需求的能力。空间可达性比率的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数与 2010 年农村-城市通勤区代码和区域贫困指数五分位数进行比较,以确定具有更高和更低肺癌风险的人群的特征。

结果

在 95 个 ACR 认证的筛查机构中,共确定了 549 名放射技师。我们观察到,95%的合格人口都可以接近任何 ACR 设施进行地理访问。然而,当我们纳入 E2SFCA 方法时,我们发现合格人群的访问情况存在显著差异。可用性措施的纳入降低了大多数合格人群的访问量。此外,我们观察到农村地区的相关性较大,而社会经济劣势较大的地区的相关性适度,访问量较低。

解释

农村和社会经济劣势地区面临着显著的差异。E2SFCA 模型表明,能力是一个重要组成部分,以及地理可达性和可用性如何共同促成 LCS 获得机会的差异。

相似文献

1
Understanding Washington State's Low Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening in Two Steps: A Geospatial Analysis of Patient Travel Time and Health Care Availability of Imaging Sites.理解华盛顿州肺癌筛查低参与度的两步法:患者出行时间和影像学站点医疗可及性的地理空间分析。
Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Access to Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration: Does Geographic Distribution Match Need in the Population?退伍军人事务部的肺癌筛查机会:地理分布是否符合人群需求?
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
3
Geographic Access to CT for Lung Cancer Screening: A Census Tract-Level Analysis of Cigarette Smoking in the United States and Driving Distance to a CT Facility.肺癌筛查的 CT 地理可及性:美国的美国人口普查地段水平分析与 CT 设施的驾驶距离与吸烟的关系。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jan;16(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
4
Using Geospatial Analysis to Evaluate Access to Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.利用地理空间分析评估美国的肺癌筛查机会。
Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):833-844. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2081. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States.美国城乡环境中符合条件的成年人获得肺癌筛查的地理可达性。
Cancer. 2022 Apr 15;128(8):1584-1594. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33996. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.解决肺癌筛查资格和医疗保健获取方面的差异。美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):e95-e112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3053ST.
7
Urban-Rural Disparities in Access to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening in Missouri and Illinois.密苏里州和伊利诺伊州低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查机会的城乡差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 5;17:E140. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200202.
8
Access to Lung Cancer Screening Services: Preliminary Analysis of Geographic Service Distribution Using the ACR Lung Cancer Screening Registry.肺癌筛查服务的可及性:使用美国放射学会肺癌筛查登记处对地理服务分布的初步分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):1388-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.024.
9
A Geospatial Analysis of Factors Affecting Access to CT Facilities: Implications for Lung Cancer Screening.基于地理空间分析的 CT 设施可达性影响因素研究——对肺癌筛查的启示
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Dec;16(12):1663-1668. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
10
Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Breast Cancer Screening: A Spatial Clustering Analysis.农村-城市乳腺癌筛查机会的差异:空间聚类分析。
J Rural Health. 2019 Mar;35(2):229-235. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12308. Epub 2018 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial analysis of prehospital emergency medical services accessibility: a comparative evaluation of the GAUSS-probability two-step floating catchment area model in Handan City.院前急救医疗服务可及性的空间分析:邯郸市高斯概率两步浮动截获区模型的比较评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 28;13:1548462. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1548462. eCollection 2025.