• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国儿童和青少年(CYP)获得初级保健的途径:对 CYP、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对促进因素和障碍的看法和经验的范围综述。

Access to primary care for children and young people (CYP) in the UK: a scoping review of CYP's, caregivers' and healthcare professionals' views and experiences of facilitators and barriers.

机构信息

NIHR Children and Families Policy Research Unit, Population, Policy and Practice, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK

Thomas Coram Research Unit, UCL Social Research Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e081620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081620.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081620
PMID:38816045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11141190/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine children and young people's (CYP), caregivers' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views or experiences of facilitators and barriers to CYP access to UK primary care services to better understand healthcare inequity. To explore differences across CYP subpopulations with greater health needs from deprived areas, identifying as ethnic minorities, with experiences of state care, special educational needs or disabilities, chronic conditions or mental health problems.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Included studies were in English, published 2012-2022 and reported: the views/experiences of CYP (0-25 years), caregivers or HCPs about accessing UK primary care; using quantitative or qualitative empirical methods.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Scopus.

RESULTS

We included 47 reports (46 studies). CYP/caregivers' decision to access care was facilitated by CYP/caregivers' or their family/friends' ability to identify a health issue as warranting healthcare attention. Barriers to accessing care included perceived stigma (eg, being seen as a bad parent), embarrassment and discrimination experiences. CYP and caregivers believed longer opening hours could facilitate more timely access to care. Caregivers and HCPs reported that delayed or rejected referrals to secondary or adult care were a barrier to having needs met, especially for CYP with poor mental health. CYP and caregivers in numerous studies emphasised the importance of communication and trust with HCPs, including taking their concerns seriously, being knowledgeable and providing continuity of care for CYP. Common barriers reported across high-need subpopulations were caregivers needing knowledge and confidence to advocate for their child, gaps in HCP's knowledge and a lack of connectedness between primary and secondary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Connecting general practices and community health workers/services, improving CYP/caregivers' understanding of common childhood conditions, addressing HCP's knowledge gaps in paediatric care and integrated approaches between primary and secondary care may reduce inequity in access.

摘要

目的

研究儿童和青少年(CYP)、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对 CYP 获得英国初级保健服务的促进因素和障碍的看法或经验,以更好地了解医疗保健中的不平等现象。探讨来自贫困地区、少数民族、有国家照顾经历、特殊教育需求或残疾、慢性疾病或心理健康问题等健康需求较高的 CYP 亚群之间的差异。

设计

范围审查。

纳入标准

研究为英文,发表于 2012 年至 2022 年,报告了:CYP(0-25 岁)、照顾者或 HCP 对获得英国初级保健的看法/经验;使用定量或定性实证方法。

数据来源

PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、PsycINFO 和 Scopus。

结果

我们纳入了 47 份报告(46 项研究)。CYP/照顾者决定寻求医疗保健的原因是他们或其家人/朋友能够识别出需要医疗关注的健康问题。寻求医疗保健的障碍包括感知到的耻辱感(例如,被视为坏父母)、尴尬和歧视经历。CYP 和照顾者认为增加开放时间可以更方便地及时获得医疗服务。照顾者和 HCP 报告称,延迟或拒绝转介到二级或成人护理是满足需求的障碍,尤其是对于心理健康状况较差的 CYP。许多研究中的 CYP 和照顾者强调与 HCP 沟通和建立信任的重要性,包括认真对待他们的担忧、有知识并为 CYP 提供连续性护理。高需求亚群普遍报告的障碍包括照顾者需要知识和信心来为孩子辩护、HCP 知识差距以及初级保健和二级保健之间缺乏联系。

结论

连接一般实践和社区卫生工作者/服务、提高 CYP/照顾者对常见儿童疾病的认识、解决 HCP 在儿科护理方面的知识差距以及初级保健和二级保健之间的综合方法可能会减少获得服务的不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2123/11141190/90a37be99f00/bmjopen-2023-081620f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2123/11141190/2e9cab9804b3/bmjopen-2023-081620f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2123/11141190/90a37be99f00/bmjopen-2023-081620f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2123/11141190/2e9cab9804b3/bmjopen-2023-081620f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2123/11141190/90a37be99f00/bmjopen-2023-081620f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Access to primary care for children and young people (CYP) in the UK: a scoping review of CYP's, caregivers' and healthcare professionals' views and experiences of facilitators and barriers.英国儿童和青少年(CYP)获得初级保健的途径:对 CYP、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对促进因素和障碍的看法和经验的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e081620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081620.
2
Patient and caregiver characteristics associated with differential use of primary care for children and young people in the UK: a scoping review.与英国儿童和青少年对初级保健的差异化使用相关的患者和照顾者特征:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e078505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078505.
3
Caregivers' and healthcare professionals' perspective of barriers and facilitators to health service access for asthmatic children: a qualitative study.照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对哮喘儿童获得卫生服务的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001066.
4
'There was nothing, just absolute darkness': Understanding the needs of those caring for children and young people with complex neurodisability in a diverse UK context: A qualitative exploration in the ENCOMPASS study.“一片漆黑,什么也没有”:在多元化的英国背景下,了解照顾复杂神经残疾儿童和青少年的人群的需求:ENCOMPASS 研究中的定性探索。
Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jul;50(4):e13303. doi: 10.1111/cch.13303.
5
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
6
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.定性证据综合分析有助于我们理解人们对定向数字通信的认知和体验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141.
7
Understanding inequities in access to diabetes technologies in children and young people with type 1 diabetes: Qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives and views.了解1型糖尿病儿童和青少年获取糖尿病技术方面的不平等现象:对医疗保健专业人员观点和看法的定性研究
Diabet Med. 2025 Apr;42(4):e15486. doi: 10.1111/dme.15486. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Negotiating Access to Health and Wellbeing Support in Schools for Young People with Chronic Health Conditions in English Secondary Schools: A Qualitative Multi-Informant Study.英国中学慢性病青少年获取学校健康与幸福支持的协商:一项多信息提供者定性研究
Contin Educ. 2025 Feb 17;6(1):22-37. doi: 10.5334/cie.149. eCollection 2025.
2
Care-experienced young people's views and experiences of accessing general practice and dental services and attending health reviews in England: a qualitative study.有照护经历的年轻人获取英国普通科医疗服务和牙科服务以及参加健康审查的观点和体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 29;25(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02569-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Early evaluation of the Children and Young People's Mental Health Trailblazer programme: a rapid mixed-methods study.早期评估儿童和青少年心理健康开拓计划:一项快速混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(8):1-137. doi: 10.3310/XQWU4117.
2
Reducing health inequalities through general practice.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e463-e472. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00093-2.
3
Wellbeing while waiting evaluating social prescribing in CAMHS: study protocol for a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness study.
等待时的幸福感评估:CAMHS 社会处方的混合 II 型实施-有效性研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 10;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04758-0.
4
Barriers and facilitators to continuity and co-ordination of healthcare for under 18 years old: a systematic review.18 岁以下人群医疗保健的连续性和协调性的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2023 Oct;108(10):783-788. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324456. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Multimorbidity patterns and risk of hospitalisation in children: A population cohort study of 3.6 million children in England, with illustrative examples from childhood cancer survivors.儿童的多种疾病模式与住院风险:一项针对英格兰360万儿童的人群队列研究,并以儿童癌症幸存者为例进行说明。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun 30;20:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100433. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Young people who have fallen through the mental health transition gap: a qualitative study on primary care support.精神卫生过渡缺口下的失足青年:基层医疗支持的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 May 26;72(719):e413-e420. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0678. Print 2022 Jun.
7
GP workforce crisis: what can we do now?全科医生劳动力危机:我们现在能做什么?
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):206-207. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X719225. Print 2022 May.
8
Community pharmacy role in children's health in England: Experiences and opinions of parents and young people.社区药房在英格兰儿童健康中的作用:家长和年轻人的经验和看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2362-2371. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13786. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
9
Understanding Trustful Relationships between Community Health Workers and Vulnerable Citizens during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Realist Evaluation.理解社区卫生工作者与弱势群体在 COVID-19 大流行期间的信任关系:一项现实主义评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(5):2496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052496.
10
Global prevalence of unmet need for mental health care among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全球青少年心理健康护理未满足需求的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022 Feb;36:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 25.