Suppr超能文献

多少网络色情内容算过多?两种理论上不同的评估量表的比较。

How much online pornography is too much? A comparison of two theoretically distinct assessment scales.

作者信息

Vera Cruz Germano, Aboujaoude Elias, Liberacka-Dwojak Magdalena, Wiłkość-Dębczyńska Monika, Rochat Lucien, Khan Riaz, Khazaal Yasser

机构信息

Department of Psychology, CRP-CPO, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2024 May 30;82(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01294-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online pornography use, an ever more common activity, has raised myriad psychosocial and clinical concerns. While there is a need to screen for and measure its problematic dimension, there is a debate about the adequacy of existing assessment tools.

OBJECTIVE

The study compares two instruments for measuring pathological online pornography use (POPU) that are based on different theoretical frameworks-one in line with DSM-5 criteria and the six-component addiction model and one in line with ICD-11 criteria.

METHODS

An international sample of 1,823 adults (Mean age = 31.66, SD = 6.74) answered an online questionnaire that included the Short Version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS-6) and the Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-Use Disorders (ACSID-11). Factorial, correlational, and network analyses were conducted on the data.

RESULTS

Both tools adequately screened for online "addictive" behavior, but the ACSID-11 was superior in assessing the degree of clinical risk.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the specific aim of the assessment (screening vs. clinical diagnostics), both online pornography measurement tools may be useful.

摘要

背景

在线观看色情内容这一行为日益普遍,引发了无数社会心理和临床方面的担忧。虽然有必要筛查和衡量其问题维度,但对于现有评估工具的充分性存在争议。

目的

本研究比较了两种基于不同理论框架来测量病理性在线观看色情内容(POPU)的工具——一种符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)标准和六成分成瘾模型,另一种符合《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)标准。

方法

一个由1823名成年人组成的国际样本(平均年龄 = 31.66,标准差 = 6.74)回答了一份在线问卷,其中包括问题性色情内容消费量表简版(PPCS-6)和特定互联网使用障碍标准评估量表(ACSID-11)。对数据进行了因子分析、相关性分析和网络分析。

结果

两种工具都能充分筛查在线“成瘾”行为,但ACSID-11在评估临床风险程度方面更具优势。

结论

根据评估的具体目的(筛查与临床诊断),两种在线色情内容测量工具可能都有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c09c/11137999/0f789ebbacf4/13690_2024_1294_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验