Vera Cruz Germano, Aboujaoude Elias, Liberacka-Dwojak Magdalena, Wiłkość-Dębczyńska Monika, Rochat Lucien, Khan Riaz, Khazaal Yasser
Department of Psychology, CRP-CPO, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Arch Public Health. 2024 May 30;82(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01294-5.
Online pornography use, an ever more common activity, has raised myriad psychosocial and clinical concerns. While there is a need to screen for and measure its problematic dimension, there is a debate about the adequacy of existing assessment tools.
The study compares two instruments for measuring pathological online pornography use (POPU) that are based on different theoretical frameworks-one in line with DSM-5 criteria and the six-component addiction model and one in line with ICD-11 criteria.
An international sample of 1,823 adults (Mean age = 31.66, SD = 6.74) answered an online questionnaire that included the Short Version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS-6) and the Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-Use Disorders (ACSID-11). Factorial, correlational, and network analyses were conducted on the data.
Both tools adequately screened for online "addictive" behavior, but the ACSID-11 was superior in assessing the degree of clinical risk.
Depending on the specific aim of the assessment (screening vs. clinical diagnostics), both online pornography measurement tools may be useful.
在线观看色情内容这一行为日益普遍,引发了无数社会心理和临床方面的担忧。虽然有必要筛查和衡量其问题维度,但对于现有评估工具的充分性存在争议。
本研究比较了两种基于不同理论框架来测量病理性在线观看色情内容(POPU)的工具——一种符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)标准和六成分成瘾模型,另一种符合《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)标准。
一个由1823名成年人组成的国际样本(平均年龄 = 31.66,标准差 = 6.74)回答了一份在线问卷,其中包括问题性色情内容消费量表简版(PPCS-6)和特定互联网使用障碍标准评估量表(ACSID-11)。对数据进行了因子分析、相关性分析和网络分析。
两种工具都能充分筛查在线“成瘾”行为,但ACSID-11在评估临床风险程度方面更具优势。
根据评估的具体目的(筛查与临床诊断),两种在线色情内容测量工具可能都有用。