• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激进具身认知神经科学的主旨。

The motifs of radical embodied neuroscience.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4738-4755. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16434. Epub 2024 May 30.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.16434
PMID:38816952
Abstract

In this paper, I analyse how the emerging scientific framework of radical embodied neuroscience is different from contemporary mainstream cognitive neuroscience. To do so, I propose the notion of motif to enrich the philosophical toolkit of cognitive neuroscience. This notion can be used to characterize the guiding ideas of any given scientific framework in psychology and neuroscience. Motifs are highly unconstrained, open-ended concepts that support equally open-ended families of explanations. Different scientific frameworks-e.g., psychophysics or cognitive neuroscience-provide these motifs to answer the overarching themes of these disciplines, such as the relationship between stimuli and sensations or the proper methods of the sciences of the mind. Some motifs of mainstream cognitive neuroscience are the motif of encoding, the motif of input-output systems, and the motif of algorithms. The two first ones answer the question about the relationship between stimuli, sensations and experience (e.g., stimuli are input and are encoded by brain structures). The latter one answers the question regarding the mechanism of cognition and experience. The three of them are equally unconstrained and open-ended, and they serve as an umbrella for different kinds of explanation-i.e., different positions regarding what counts as a code or as an input. Along with the articulation of the notion of motif, the main aim of this article is to present three motifs for radical embodied neuroscience: the motif of complex stimulation, the motif of organic behaviour and the motif of resonance.

摘要

在本文中,我分析了新兴的激进具身神经科学科学框架与当代主流认知神经科学有何不同。为此,我提出了动机的概念,以丰富认知神经科学的哲学工具包。这个概念可以用来描述心理学和神经科学中任何给定科学框架的指导思想。动机是高度无约束的、开放式的概念,支持同样开放式的解释家族。不同的科学框架,如心理物理学或认知神经科学,提供了这些动机来回答这些学科的总体主题,例如刺激与感觉之间的关系或心理科学的适当方法。主流认知神经科学的一些动机是编码动机、输入-输出系统动机和算法动机。前两个动机回答了关于刺激、感觉和经验之间关系的问题(例如,刺激是输入,由大脑结构编码)。后者回答了关于认知和经验机制的问题。它们三者都是同样无约束和开放式的,并且它们作为一个伞形概念,为不同种类的解释提供了基础,即不同的立场,涉及到什么算作编码或输入。本文的主要目的是与动机概念的阐述一起,提出激进具身神经科学的三个动机:复杂刺激动机、有机行为动机和共振动机。

相似文献

1
The motifs of radical embodied neuroscience.激进具身认知神经科学的主旨。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4738-4755. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16434. Epub 2024 May 30.
2
Theoretical strategies for an embodied cognitive neuroscience: Mechanistic explanations of brain-body-environment systems.具身认知神经科学的理论策略:脑-体-环境系统的机制性解释。
Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul-Oct;15(3-4):85-97. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2349546. Epub 2024 May 12.
3
Incorporating individual differences into a mechanistic embodied cognitive neuroscience.将个体差异纳入到机械的具身认知神经科学中。
Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul-Oct;15(3-4):117-118. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2405190. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
4
Embodied (4EA) cognitive computational neuroscience.具身(4EA)认知计算神经科学。
Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul-Oct;15(3-4):119-121. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2405192. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
5
Spatiotemporal neuroscience - what is it and why we need it.时空神经科学——它是什么,以及我们为什么需要它。
Phys Life Rev. 2020 Jul;33:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
6
Beyond embodiment: Rethinking the integration of cognitive neuroscience and mechanistic explanations.超越体现:重新思考认知神经科学和机械论解释的整合。
Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul-Oct;15(3-4):114-116. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2403350. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
7
Commentary: The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience.评论:具身化大脑:迈向激进的具身化认知神经科学
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 21;9:669. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00669. eCollection 2015.
8
The diversity of possible constitutive components in cognitive neurosciences.认知神经科学中可能的构成成分的多样性。
Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul-Oct;15(3-4):108-110. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2411317. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
9
What does the interactive brain hypothesis mean for social neuroscience? A dialogue.互动大脑假说对社会神经科学意味着什么?一场对话。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 May 5;371(1693). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0379.
10
Mechanisms after the end of New Mechanism.新机制结束后的机制。
Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul-Oct;15(3-4):100-101. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2405193. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecological Resonance Is Reflected in Human Brain Activity.生态共振反映在人类大脑活动中。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Sep;62(9):e70136. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70136.
2
The illusion of internal models in biological movement.生物运动中内部模型的错觉
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05963-3.