Double-Bending Tension Band Wire for Olecranon Fractures: A Novel Technique.

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of conventional tension band wire (TBW), TBW with penetrating technique, and double-bending technique.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients (17 men and 23 women; mean age: 64.0 ± 19.0 years) who underwent surgery for displaced olecranon fractures between January 2018 and December 2021 were included and divided into three groups based on the surgical method used (group A, conventional TBW; group B, TBW with penetrating technique; and group C, double-bending technique). Thirteen patients were assigned to group A, 17 to group B, and 10 to group C, including 2 Mayo type IB, 30 Mayo type IIA, and 8 Mayo type IIB fractures. Postoperative outcomes (elbow extension and flexion arc) and complications, such as backing out of the Kirschner wire (K-wire), were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the general characteristics of the patients and fracture type among the three groups. The mean elbow extension arc values were 6.2°, 10.9°, and 0° in groups A, B, and C, respectively; it was significantly better in group C than in group B ( = .001). The rates of backing out of the K-wire were 84.6% (11/13) in group A, 41.2% (7/17) in group B, and 0% (0/10) in group C; the rate was significantly lower in group C than in group A ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The double-bending technique may be the best procedure for preventing the backing out of the K-wire and postoperative complications, such as range of motion restriction, for treating olecranon fractures that are treatable by TBW.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.