• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tension-Band Wire Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.鹰嘴骨折的张力带钢丝固定术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018 Aug 8;8(3):e22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00071. eCollection 2018 Sep 28.
2
Tension Suture Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.鹰嘴骨折的张力缝合固定术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Jun 3;11(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00042. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
3
Plate Versus Tension-Band Wire Fixation for Olecranon Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial.钢板与张力带钢丝治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折:前瞻性随机试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 2;99(15):1261-1273. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00773.
4
The With Or Without Olecranon K-wire (WOW OK) Trial of tension band wire fixation versus cerclage fixation without K-wires in displaced stable olecranon fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.带或不带尺骨鹰嘴 K 线(WOW OK)试验:对比张力带钢丝固定与无 K 线环扎固定治疗移位稳定型尺骨鹰嘴骨折的随机对照试验:研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 29;24(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07566-9.
5
A new all-suture tension band tape fixation technique for simple olecranon fractures versus conventional tension band wire fixation: a comparative biomechanics study.一种新的全缝线张力带带固定技术治疗单纯尺骨鹰嘴骨折与传统张力带钢丝固定的比较:一项生物力学研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jul;31(7):1376-1384. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.130. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
6
Olecranon Osteotomy Exposure for Distal Humeral Fracture Treatment.鹰嘴截骨术暴露用于肱骨远端骨折治疗
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Jul 5;14(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00041. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
7
Simple and comminuted displaced olecranon fractures: a clinical comparison between tension band wiring and plate fixation techniques.简单粉碎性移位尺骨鹰嘴骨折:张力带钢丝固定与钢板固定技术的临床比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2021-9. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
8
Tension band wiring versus locking plate fixation for simple, two-part Mayo 2A olecranon fractures: a comparison of post-operative outcomes, complications, reoperations and economics.张力带钢丝固定与锁定钢板固定治疗简单的两部分梅奥2A型尺骨鹰嘴骨折:术后结果、并发症、再次手术及经济学比较
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Aug;103(2):155-160. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0556-6. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
9
Olecranon fractures: treatment options.鹰嘴骨折:治疗选择
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 Jul-Aug;8(4):266-75. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200007000-00007.
10
[A biomechanical study on internal fixation of proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture].尺骨近端合并鹰嘴骨折内固定的生物力学研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;26(1):10-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision Olecranon Fixation: Is Tension Band Wiring the Solution? A Case Series and Review of the Literature.尺骨鹰嘴固定翻修:张力带钢丝固定是解决办法吗?病例系列及文献综述
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 May 16;9(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00049. eCollection 2025 May 1.
2
Double-Bending Tension Band Wire for Olecranon Fractures: A Novel Technique.用于鹰嘴骨折的双弯张力带钢丝:一种新技术。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Feb 1;6(3):281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.12.007. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Biomechanical comparison of continuous compression implants versus tension band fixation for transverse olecranon fractures.横行鹰嘴骨折连续加压植入物与张力带固定的生物力学比较
J Orthop. 2022 Sep 28;34:316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.09.015. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
4
Bilateral Asynchronous Displaced Olecranon Fractures in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.一名成骨不全患者的双侧异步移位鹰嘴骨折
Cureus. 2022 Mar 23;14(3):e23433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23433. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Mini-fragment plating of olecranon fractures is comparable to precontoured small-fragment plating.鹰嘴骨折的微型接骨板固定与预塑形的小型接骨板固定效果相当。
J Orthop. 2022 Feb 11;30:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.009. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
6
Reduction of olecranon fractures with no or minimal dorsal cortex comminution based on the contour of the posterior ulnar cortex: does it restore the greater sigmoid notch?基于尺骨后皮质轮廓的无或轻度背侧皮质粉碎的尺骨鹰嘴骨折复位:是否能恢复更大的乙状切迹?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Sep;142(9):2215-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03934-9. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly: outcomes after non-operative treatment - a narrative review.老年移位性鹰嘴骨折:非手术治疗后的结果——一项叙述性综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Aug 1;5(7):391-397. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190041. eCollection 2020 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Plate Versus Tension-Band Wire Fixation for Olecranon Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial.钢板与张力带钢丝治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折:前瞻性随机试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 2;99(15):1261-1273. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00773.
2
Prospective randomised trial of non-operative operative management of olecranon fractures in the elderly.老年尺骨鹰嘴骨折非手术与手术治疗的前瞻性随机试验
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):964-972. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2016-1112.R2.
3
The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal ulna.尺骨近端骨折的流行病学。
Injury. 2012 Mar;43(3):343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
4
Olecranon fractures.尺骨鹰嘴骨折。
Injury. 2009 Jun;40(6):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.013. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
5
Is tension band wiring technique the "gold standard" for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study.张力带钢丝固定技术是治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折的“金标准”吗?一项长期功能预后研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Feb 22;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-9.
6
Current concepts in the treatment of fractures of the radial head, the olecranon, and the coronoid.桡骨头、鹰嘴和冠突骨折治疗的当前概念
Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:175-85.

鹰嘴骨折的张力带钢丝固定术

Tension-Band Wire Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.

作者信息

Carter Tom H, Molyneux Samuel G, Reid Jeffrey T, White Timothy O, Duckworth Andrew D

机构信息

Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018 Aug 8;8(3):e22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00071. eCollection 2018 Sep 28.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00071
PMID:30588367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6292719/
Abstract

Olecranon fractures account for approximately 20% of fractures of the proximal part of the forearm. Clinicians may consider nonoperative management for elderly low-demand patients, whereas operative fixation is recommended for active patients with a displaced fracture. Tension-band wire (TBW) fixation is commonly employed for simple isolated stable displaced fractures of the olecranon (type IIA according to the Mayo classification). In contrast, plate fixation is thought to provide superior outcomes for unstable comminuted olecranon fractures. Biomechanical principles of the TBW construct are based on the hypotheses of absolute fracture stability, exploiting functional limb movement, and converting tensile forces into compression through the actions of the triceps and brachialis. The surgical goals are to restore articular congruity, provide stable reliable fixation, and allow early mobilization to minimize joint stiffness. In a recent prospective randomized trial comparing plate fixation with TBW in 67 active adult patients, we found no difference between groups with respect to either patient or surgeon-reported outcome measures. The overall complication rate was higher following TBW fixation, with implant removal required for 1 in 2 patients. However, it may still be the preferable procedure given that the more serious issues of infection and revision surgery occurred exclusively following plate fixation. The key steps of the procedure are (1) preoperative planning with careful assessment of radiographs; (2) positioning the patient supine and gaining exposure with a posterior longitudinal direct midline incision, raising lateral and medial fasciocutaneous flaps, and developing subperiosteal dissection in the interval between the flexor carpi ulnaris and extensor carpi ulnaris to visualize the fracture; (3) visual reduction maintained with a pointed reduction clamp, with joint congruity confirmed with an image intensifier if needed; (4) creation of the TBW construct with 2 parallel 1.6-mm Kirschner wires passed longitudinally from the proximal fragment into the distal part of the ulna, engaging the anterior cortex with care, and a 1.2-mm flexible cerclage wire placed through a transverse tunnel 3 to 4 cm distal to the fracture, passed posterior to the 2 Kirschner wires, and secured in a figure-of-8 configuration; (5) appropriate tensioning of the construct followed by trimming and burial of the wire ends; (6) layered wound closure according to surgeon preference; and (7) a postoperative protocol consisting of application of an above-the-elbow synthetic bandage, which is worn for 10 to 14 days, and gentle active mobilization under physiotherapy supervision. We advise against heavy lifting for at least 6 to 8 weeks and do not routinely remove implants unless they are symptomatic.

摘要

鹰嘴骨折约占前臂近端骨折的20%。对于需求较低的老年患者,临床医生可能会考虑非手术治疗,而对于骨折移位的活跃患者,则建议进行手术固定。张力带钢丝(TBW)固定通常用于单纯孤立的稳定移位型鹰嘴骨折(根据梅奥分类为IIA型)。相比之下,钢板固定被认为对不稳定的粉碎性鹰嘴骨折能提供更好的治疗效果。TBW结构的生物力学原理基于绝对骨折稳定性的假设,利用肢体的功能性运动,并通过肱三头肌和肱肌的作用将拉力转化为压力。手术目标是恢复关节的一致性,提供稳定可靠的固定,并允许早期活动以尽量减少关节僵硬。在最近一项对67名活跃成年患者进行的比较钢板固定与TBW固定的前瞻性随机试验中,我们发现两组在患者或外科医生报告的疗效指标方面没有差异。TBW固定后的总体并发症发生率较高,每2名患者中就有1名需要取出植入物。然而,鉴于更严重的感染和翻修手术问题仅发生在钢板固定后,TBW固定可能仍是更可取的手术方法。该手术的关键步骤包括:(1)术前仔细评估X线片进行规划;(2)患者仰卧位,通过后正中纵行切口暴露骨折部位,掀起外侧和内侧筋膜皮瓣,在尺侧腕屈肌和尺侧腕伸肌之间进行骨膜下剥离以显露骨折;(3)用尖嘴复位钳维持直视下复位,并在必要时用影像增强器确认关节一致性;(4)构建TBW结构,用2根平行的1.6 mm克氏针从近端骨折块纵向穿入尺骨远端,小心穿透前方皮质,并用一根1.2 mm的柔性环扎钢丝穿过骨折部位远端3至4 cm处的横向隧道,从2根克氏针后方穿过,并固定成8字形;(5)适当拉紧结构,然后修剪并埋入钢丝末端;(6)根据外科医生的偏好分层缝合伤口;(7)术后方案包括应用上臂合成绷带,佩戴10至14天,并在物理治疗师的监督下进行轻柔的主动活动。我们建议至少6至8周内避免重物搬运,除非植入物出现症状,否则一般不常规取出。