Suppr超能文献

使用不同能量和脉冲设置的摩西技术模式评估结石消融率:一项实验研究。

Assessment of stone ablation rate using the Moses technology modes with different energy and pulse settings: An experimental study.

作者信息

Martinez BegonaBallesta, Ntasiotis Panteleimon, Katsakiori Paraskevi, Tatanis Vasileios, Peteinaris Angelis, Faitatziadis Solon, Gkeka Kristiana, Spinos Theodoros, Vrettos Theofanis, Liatsikos Evangelos, Kallidonis Panagiotis

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Spain.

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Arab J Urol. 2024 Jan 5;22(3):131-137. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2023.2301641. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare lithotripsy ablation rate with the Moses modes versus conventional pulse modes when using the Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser.

METHODS

The Lumenis® Pulse P120H Holmium Laser System and a 365 μm Moses D/F/L fiber were used to assess stone ablation rate in conventional Short and Long Pulse as well as Moses Contact and Distance at 10 W (0.5Jx20Hz and 2Jx5Hz) and 60 W (1Jx60Hz and 2Jx30Hz). Hard and soft phantom stones were formed, and all tests were conducted in a custom experimental configuration installed in a saline-filled bath. The laser was delivered up to 3 kJ of total energy. The fragmentation pattern was assessed via photographs in each cohort.

RESULTS

The time to reach the target energy was 5 min and 50 s in all 10 W and 60 W trials, respectively. In both stone types, ablation was more effective when high-power, high-energy and Moses Distance was utilized. In soft stones, the lowest ablation rate was detected in the Long Pulse modality in all power, energy and frequency settings. Overall, when dusting settings (high-frequency, low-energy) were used, a deeper single cavitation was observed rather than small cavitations.

CONCLUSIONS

The most effective pulse modality as evaluated via stone ablation rate depends on the stone hardness as well as energy and frequency settings. In both hard and soft stones, ablation is more effective when 60 W (2Jx30Hz) power settings and Moses Distance are used. Tailored laser settings in terms of energy and frequency could be set for each case scenario.

摘要

目的

在使用钬:钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光时,比较摩西模式与传统脉冲模式下的碎石消融率。

方法

使用Lumenis® Pulse P120H钬激光系统和一根365μm的摩西D/F/L光纤,在10W(0.5Jx20Hz和2Jx5Hz)和60W(1Jx60Hz和2Jx30Hz)的功率下,评估传统短脉冲和长脉冲以及摩西接触模式和距离模式下的结石消融率。制作了硬体和软体模拟结石,并在安装于充满盐水的水槽中的定制实验装置中进行所有测试。激光传输的总能量高达3kJ。通过每组的照片评估破碎模式。

结果

在所有10W和60W的试验中,达到目标能量的时间分别为5分50秒。在两种结石类型中,使用高功率、高能量和摩西距离模式时消融效果更佳。在软体结石中,在所有功率、能量和频率设置下,长脉冲模式下的消融率最低。总体而言,在使用“粉尘化”设置(高频、低能量)时,观察到的是较深的单个空化现象,而非小空化现象。

结论

通过结石消融率评估,最有效的脉冲模式取决于结石硬度以及能量和频率设置。在硬体和软体结石中,使用60W(2Jx30Hz)功率设置和摩西距离模式时消融效果更佳。可以针对每种情况设置能量和频率方面的定制激光设置。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2e/11136463/dfcd689c1bd0/TAJU_A_2301641_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验