• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in cirrhotic patients: First American cohort.肝硬化患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术的结局:首个美国队列研究。
World J Hepatol. 2024 May 27;16(5):784-790. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.784.
2
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Esophageal Neoplasms Is Feasible and Not Riskier for Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表性食管肿瘤对肝硬化患者是可行的且风险不高。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Dec;61(12):3565-3571. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4342-8. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.AGA 研究所临床实践更新:美国内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
4
Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.散发性十二指肠腺瘤的内镜切除:内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)与内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)混合技术的比较及迟发性出血风险
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1594-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3356-y. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
5
Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.1000例早期胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果:韩国ESD研究组多中心研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
6
Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques in Cirrhosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.肝硬化先进内镜切除术技术:结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Oct;67(10):4813-4826. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07364-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms in patients with liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者浅表食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果
Clin Endosc. 2022 May;55(3):381-389. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.242. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
8
The feasibility and safety of the endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial gastric neoplastic lesions in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: a retrospective study.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗代偿期肝硬化患者胃黏膜浅表性肿瘤的可行性和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Gut Liver. 2012 Jan;6(1):58-63. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.58. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠息肉:结局的决定因素。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1293-1302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09672-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
10
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Circumferential Mucosal Incision for Colorectal Neoplasms: Comparison with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and between Two Endoscopists with Different Experiences.用于结直肠肿瘤的环形黏膜切口内镜黏膜切除术:与内镜黏膜下剥离术的比较以及不同经验的两位内镜医师之间的比较
Clin Endosc. 2017 Jul;50(4):379-387. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.058. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic resection of early esophageal neoplasia in patients with esophageal varices: a systematic review.食管静脉曲张患者早期食管肿瘤的内镜切除术:一项系统评价
Endoscopy. 2025 Jul;57(7):769-777. doi: 10.1055/a-2524-4148. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Local Recurrence after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer.早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术后的局部复发
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 3;12(5):2018. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052018.
2
Long-term outcome of the endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer: A comparison between patients with and without liver cirrhosis.早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术的长期预后:肝硬化患者与非肝硬化患者的比较
Oncol Lett. 2022 Sep 22;24(5):404. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13524. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Risk of residual neoplasia after a noncurative colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for malignant lesions: a multinational study.恶性病变非根治性大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术后残留肿瘤形成的风险:一项多国研究
Endoscopy. 2023 Mar;55(3):235-244. doi: 10.1055/a-1906-8000. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan.日本一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究:内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠大型上皮性肿瘤的长期疗效。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Nov;163(5):1423-1434.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques in Cirrhosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.肝硬化先进内镜切除术技术:结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Oct;67(10):4813-4826. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07364-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
6
Global Epidemiology of Chronic Liver Disease.慢性肝病的全球流行病学
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021 Jun 4;17(5):365-370. doi: 10.1002/cld.1061. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study.北美内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项大型前瞻性多中心研究。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jun;160(7):2317-2327.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
The burden of liver cirrhosis and underlying etiologies: results from the global burden of disease study 2017.肝硬化及其潜在病因的负担:来自 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Jan 12;13(1):279-300. doi: 10.18632/aging.104127.
9
Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis Increases the Risk for Bleeding Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy.Child-Pugh B 或 C 级肝硬化增加结肠镜息肉切除术后出血的风险。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):755-764. doi: 10.5009/gnl19131.
10
AGA Clinical Practice Update: Coagulation in Cirrhosis.AGA 临床实践更新:肝硬化中的凝血。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jul;157(1):34-43.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.070. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

肝硬化患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术的结局:首个美国队列研究。

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in cirrhotic patients: First American cohort.

作者信息

Pecha Robert Luke, Ayoub Fares, Patel Ankur, Muftah Abdullah, Wright Michael W, Khalaf Mai A, Othman Mohamed O

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

出版信息

World J Hepatol. 2024 May 27;16(5):784-790. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.784.

DOI:10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.784
PMID:38818291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11135272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions, surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk. When such lesions are discovered, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection.

AIM

To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location, size, and anticoagulation use. Procedural outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included (16 cirrhosis, 43 control). There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups. En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%, 78.94% of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%, 68.89% of controls, respectively, with no significant differences. Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding (47.37% 20%; = 0.02). There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates. In the 29 patients with follow up, we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls (40% 5.26%; = 0.019), however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders.

CONCLUSION

ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis. Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.

摘要

背景

在肝硬化合并癌前或早期恶性黏膜病变的患者中,手术干预的出血风险要高得多。当发现此类病变时,内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)可能提供比手术风险更低的治愈性治疗,且与传统内镜切除术相比,预后更佳。

目的

评估ESD治疗肝硬化患者的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年7月至2022年8月期间接受ESD治疗的肝硬化患者,以1:2的比例根据病变位置、大小和抗凝药物使用情况与对照组进行匹配。比较两组的手术结果。

结果

共纳入59例患者的64个病变(16例肝硬化患者,43例对照)。两组患者或病变特征无差异。肝硬化组和对照组的整块切除率和治愈性切除率分别为84.21%、78.94%和88.89%、68.89%,无显著差异。肝硬化患者术中使用凝血抓钳控制出血的比例显著更高(47.37%对20%;P = 0.02)。其他不良事件发生率无显著差异。在29例有随访的患者中,我们发现肝硬化组的复发率高于对照组(40%对5.26%;P = 0.019),然而在控制已知混杂因素的多变量分析中,这种影响并未持续存在。

结论

ESD治疗肝硬化患者可能是安全有效的。大多数与手术相关的结果在两组之间无显著差异。鉴于已知肝病对止血的影响,肝硬化组术中需要使用凝血抓钳的出血情况预计更高。