Pecha Robert Luke, Ayoub Fares, Patel Ankur, Muftah Abdullah, Wright Michael W, Khalaf Mai A, Othman Mohamed O
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
World J Hepatol. 2024 May 27;16(5):784-790. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.784.
Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions, surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk. When such lesions are discovered, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection.
To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis.
Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location, size, and anticoagulation use. Procedural outcomes were compared between groups.
A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included (16 cirrhosis, 43 control). There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups. En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%, 78.94% of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%, 68.89% of controls, respectively, with no significant differences. Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding (47.37% 20%; = 0.02). There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates. In the 29 patients with follow up, we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls (40% 5.26%; = 0.019), however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders.
ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis. Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.
在肝硬化合并癌前或早期恶性黏膜病变的患者中,手术干预的出血风险要高得多。当发现此类病变时,内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)可能提供比手术风险更低的治愈性治疗,且与传统内镜切除术相比,预后更佳。
评估ESD治疗肝硬化患者的疗效。
回顾性分析2015年7月至2022年8月期间接受ESD治疗的肝硬化患者,以1:2的比例根据病变位置、大小和抗凝药物使用情况与对照组进行匹配。比较两组的手术结果。
共纳入59例患者的64个病变(16例肝硬化患者,43例对照)。两组患者或病变特征无差异。肝硬化组和对照组的整块切除率和治愈性切除率分别为84.21%、78.94%和88.89%、68.89%,无显著差异。肝硬化患者术中使用凝血抓钳控制出血的比例显著更高(47.37%对20%;P = 0.02)。其他不良事件发生率无显著差异。在29例有随访的患者中,我们发现肝硬化组的复发率高于对照组(40%对5.26%;P = 0.019),然而在控制已知混杂因素的多变量分析中,这种影响并未持续存在。
ESD治疗肝硬化患者可能是安全有效的。大多数与手术相关的结果在两组之间无显著差异。鉴于已知肝病对止血的影响,肝硬化组术中需要使用凝血抓钳的出血情况预计更高。