Sanfilippo F, Vaughn W K, Light J A, LeFor W M
Transplantation. 1985 Feb;39(2):151-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198502000-00009.
Data collected prospectively on 3811 cadaver renal transplants performed between June 1977 and July 1982 by the 42 member institutions of the South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation (SEOPF) were analyzed to determine whether donor-recipient differences in sub-typic HLA-A,B specialties (splits) influenced outcome. The number of HLA-A,B antigens matched and mismatched between each donor and recipient was calculated in three ways: (1) considering all antigens and splits as distinct (not matched); (2) considering all splits as only matched with their corresponding typic antigen (but not with each other); and (3) considering all splits as matched with both their corresponding typic antigen as well as each other. Overall graft survival, graft loss from irreversible rejection, and patient survival stratified by the level of HLA match were the same using all three methods. In addition, using multivariate Cox regression analysis, the strong association between good HLA matching and increased graft survival was the same using all three methods of matching. Patients with a given number of mismatched antigens had no significant decrease in survival when additional splits were considered mismatched with each other or their corresponding typic antigen. These results suggest that matching of typic HLA-A,B antigens plays a highly significant role in reducing graft rejection but that donor-recipient differences in splits have a negligible effect on graft outcome.
对1977年6月至1982年7月间由东南器官采购基金会(SEOPF)的42个成员机构进行的3811例尸体肾移植前瞻性收集的数据进行分析,以确定供体-受体在HLA-A、B亚型特异性(分型)上的差异是否会影响结果。每个供体和受体之间匹配和不匹配的HLA-A、B抗原数量通过三种方式计算:(1)将所有抗原和分型视为不同的(不匹配);(2)将所有分型仅视为与它们相应的典型抗原匹配(但彼此不匹配);(3)将所有分型视为与它们相应的典型抗原以及彼此都匹配。使用这三种方法,按HLA匹配水平分层的总体移植物存活率、不可逆排斥导致的移植物丢失率和患者存活率是相同的。此外,使用多变量Cox回归分析,使用所有三种匹配方法时,良好的HLA匹配与移植物存活率增加之间的强关联是相同的。当额外的分型被视为彼此或与其相应的典型抗原不匹配时,具有给定数量不匹配抗原的患者的存活率没有显著下降。这些结果表明,典型的HLA-A、B抗原匹配在减少移植物排斥方面起着非常重要的作用,但供体-受体在分型上的差异对移植物结果的影响可以忽略不计。