Suppr超能文献

医生是否有义务支持将临床数据用于生物医学研究的二次利用?对医生职业伦理的探究。

Do Physicians Have a Duty to Support Secondary Use of Clinical Data in Biomedical Research? An Inquiry into the Professional Ethics of Physicians.

机构信息

NATIONAL CENTER FOR TUMOR DISEASES (NCT), GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER (DKFZ), CCU APPLIED TUMOR IMMUNITY, SECTION FOR TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL ETHICS, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR TUMOR DISEASES (NCT), HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY, MEDICAL FACULTY, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, SECTION TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL ETHICS, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(1):101-117. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.146. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

Secondary use of clinical data in research or learning activities () has the potential to improve patient care and biomedical knowledge. Given this potential, the ethical question arises whether physicians have a professional duty to support . To investigate this question, we analyze prominent international declarations on physicians' professional ethics to determine whether they include duties that can be considered as good reasons for a physicians' professional duty to support . Next, we examine these documents to identify professional duties that might conflict with a potential duty of physicians to support .

摘要

临床数据的二次利用()在研究或学习活动中具有改善患者护理和生物医学知识的潜力。鉴于这种潜力,出现了一个伦理问题,即医生是否有专业义务来支持()。为了研究这个问题,我们分析了著名的关于医生职业道德的国际宣言,以确定它们是否包含可以被视为医生支持()的专业义务的好理由。接下来,我们检查这些文件,以确定可能与医生支持()的潜在义务相冲突的专业义务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验