NATIONAL CENTER FOR TUMOR DISEASES (NCT), GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER (DKFZ), CCU APPLIED TUMOR IMMUNITY, SECTION FOR TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL ETHICS, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR TUMOR DISEASES (NCT), HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY, MEDICAL FACULTY, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, SECTION TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL ETHICS, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY.
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(1):101-117. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.146. Epub 2024 May 31.
Secondary use of clinical data in research or learning activities () has the potential to improve patient care and biomedical knowledge. Given this potential, the ethical question arises whether physicians have a professional duty to support . To investigate this question, we analyze prominent international declarations on physicians' professional ethics to determine whether they include duties that can be considered as good reasons for a physicians' professional duty to support . Next, we examine these documents to identify professional duties that might conflict with a potential duty of physicians to support .
临床数据的二次利用（）在研究或学习活动中具有改善患者护理和生物医学知识的潜力。鉴于这种潜力，出现了一个伦理问题，即医生是否有专业义务来支持（）。为了研究这个问题，我们分析了著名的关于医生职业道德的国际宣言，以确定它们是否包含可以被视为医生支持（）的专业义务的好理由。接下来，我们检查这些文件，以确定可能与医生支持（）的潜在义务相冲突的专业义务。
