• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of a Deep Sedation Protocol for Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation, Cryoballoon Ablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation.

作者信息

Galuszka Oskar Marian, Kueffer Thomas, Madaffari Antonio, Kozhuharov Nikola, Thalmann Gregor, Servatius Helge, Haeberlin Andreas, Noti Fabian, Tanner Hildegard, Roten Laurent, Reichlin Tobias

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Bern Switzerland.

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e033210. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033210. Epub 2024 May 31.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.033210
PMID:38818944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11255630/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c3/11255630/64edbb4b03fd/JAH3-13-e033210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c3/11255630/64edbb4b03fd/JAH3-13-e033210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c3/11255630/64edbb4b03fd/JAH3-13-e033210-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of a Deep Sedation Protocol for Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation, Cryoballoon Ablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation.用于肺静脉隔离的深度镇静方案在脉冲场消融、冷冻球囊消融和射频消融中的可行性与安全性比较
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e033210. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033210. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
Pain Reactions during Pulmonary Vein Isolation under Deep Sedation: Cryothermal versus Radiofrequency Ablation.深度镇静下肺静脉隔离术中的疼痛反应：冷冻球囊消融术与射频消融术的比较
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 May;39(5):452-7. doi: 10.1111/pace.12840. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Comparison of effects on coagulation and inflammatory markers using a duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter vs. a cryoballoon catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.比较使用双极和单极射频导管与冷冻球囊导管进行肺静脉隔离对凝血和炎症标志物的影响。
Europace. 2013 Jun;15(6):798-804. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus411. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Ablation of atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon or duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter: a randomized controlled study comparing the clinical outcome and safety; the AF-COR study.冷冻球囊或 duty-cycled 射频肺静脉消融导管消融治疗心房颤动：一项比较临床结果和安全性的随机对照研究；AF-COR 研究。
Europace. 2013 Nov;15(11):1567-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut104. Epub 2013 May 22.
5
Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency contact force ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score analysis.冷冻球囊与射频接触力消融治疗阵发性心房颤动的比较：倾向评分分析。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 Apr;19(4):141-147. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000633.
6
Is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? A meta-analysis.冷冻球囊消融术在通过肺静脉隔离治疗心房颤动方面是否优于射频消融术？一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090323. eCollection 2014.
7
Pulmonary vein isolation in patients with a left common pulmonary vein: Comparison between second-generation cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation.肺静脉隔离术在左总肺静脉患者中的应用：第二代冷冻球囊与射频消融术的比较。
J Cardiol. 2019 Apr;73(4):292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.脉冲场消融与冷冻球囊消融和射频消融的比较：阵发性心房颤动患者行肺静脉隔离术后一年结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;67(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01651-4. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
9
Comparison of myocardial injury and inflammation after pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between radiofrequency catheter ablation and cryoballoon ablation.比较射频导管消融和冷冻球囊消融治疗阵发性心房颤动时肺静脉隔离后心肌损伤和炎症的差异。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1315-1322. doi: 10.1111/jce.14475. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Outcomes after cryoablation vs. radiofrequency in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: impact of pulmonary veins anatomy.阵发性心房颤动患者冷冻消融与射频消融后的结局：肺静脉解剖结构的影响
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1343-51. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv419. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world experience with the pentaspline pulsed field ablation system: one-year outcomes of the FARADISE registry.五样条脉冲场消融系统的真实世界经验：FARADISE注册研究的一年结果
Europace. 2025 Sep 1;27(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf182.

本文引用的文献

1
Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration.脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动的镇静策略：关注静脉注射氯胺酮在自主呼吸下的深度镇静。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad230.
2
Deep sedation protocol during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter.使用新型可变环双相脉冲场消融导管在心房颤动消融中进行深度镇静的方案。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad222.
3
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for operator-directed nurse-administered procedural sedation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled study.
在心房颤动导管消融术中，右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于由操作者指导护士实施的程序性镇静：一项随机对照研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 May;19(5):691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.12.028. Epub 2021 Dec 28.