Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Capio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Stockholm, Sweden.
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jul;52(8):1937-1943. doi: 10.1177/03635465241253840. Epub 2024 May 31.
There is still debate regarding the association between arthrometric knee laxity measurements and subjective knee outcome and revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
To assess whether arthrometric knee laxity (measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with the 1-, 2-, and 5-year subjective knee outcomes or revision ACLR at a 5-year follow-up.
Cohort study, Level of evidence 3.
Patients who underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft at the authors' institution between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, with no concomitant ligamentous injuries, were identified. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer, 134 N) was assessed 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients who underwent revision ACLR at any institution in the country within 5 years of primary surgery were identified through the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.
A total of 4697 patients (54.3% male) with available KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were included (normal: side-to-side [STS] ≤2 mm, 3015 [64.2%]; nearly normal: STS 3-5 mm, 1446 [30.8%]; abnormal: STS >5 mm, 236 [5.0%]). The only significant difference in subjective knee outcome between the groups was for the KOOS Symptoms subscale at the 1-year follow-up (STS ≤2 mm, 79.9 ± 16.2; STS 3-5 mm, 82.5 ± 14.8; STS >5 mm, 85.1 ± 14.2; < .001). No other significant differences between the groups were found preoperatively or at 1, 2, or 5 years postoperatively for any of the KOOS subscales. The hazard for revision ACLR within 5 years of the primary surgery was significantly higher for the groups with an STS of 3 to 5 mm (6.6%; 95/1446) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07-1.87; = .01) and an STS >5 mm (11.4%; 27/236) (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.69-4.03; < .001) compared with the group with an STS ≤2 mm (3.8%; 116/3015).
A high grade of postoperative knee laxity (STS 3-5 mm and STS >5 mm) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with an increased hazard of revision ACLR within 5 years, but it was not associated with an inferior subjective knee outcome.
在初次前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后,关节测量的膝关节松弛度测量值与主观膝关节结果和翻修手术之间的相关性仍存在争议。
评估初次 ACLR 后 6 个月的关节测量膝关节松弛度(使用 KT-1000 关节测量仪测量)与 1 年、2 年和 5 年的主观膝关节结果或 5 年随访时的翻修 ACLR 是否相关。
队列研究,证据水平 3。
确定在作者机构接受 ACLR 伴腘绳肌腱自体移植物治疗的患者,时间为 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日,无合并韧带损伤。术后 6 个月评估膝关节前向松弛度(KT-1000 关节测量仪,134 N)。术前及术后 1、2 和 5 年收集膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)。通过瑞典全国膝关节韧带登记处确定在初次手术后 5 年内任何机构进行翻修 ACLR 的患者。
共纳入 4697 例(54.3%为男性)患者,可获得 KT-1000 关节测量仪测量值(正常:双侧差≤2mm,3015[64.2%];接近正常:双侧差 3-5mm,1446[30.8%];异常:双侧差>5mm,236[5.0%])。在主观膝关节结果方面,仅在术后 1 年的 KOOS 症状亚量表中发现组间存在显著差异(双侧差≤2mm,79.9±16.2;双侧差 3-5mm,82.5±14.8;双侧差>5mm,85.1±14.2;<.001)。在术前或术后 1、2 或 5 年,任何 KOOS 亚量表均未发现组间存在其他显著差异。初次手术后 5 年内,双侧差 3-5mm 组(6.6%,95/1446)(危险比[HR],1.42;95%置信区间,1.07-1.87;=.01)和双侧差>5mm 组(11.4%,27/236)(HR,2.61;95%置信区间,1.69-4.03;<.001)的翻修 ACLR 风险显著高于双侧差≤2mm 组(3.8%,116/3015)。
初次 ACLR 后 6 个月膝关节松弛度较高(双侧差 3-5mm 和双侧差>5mm)与 5 年内翻修 ACLR 的风险增加相关,但与主观膝关节结果较差无关。