Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2024 Jun 5;138(11):663-685. doi: 10.1042/CS20220530.
There is a major unmet need for improved accuracy and precision in the assessment of transplant rejection and tissue injury. Diagnoses relying on histologic and visual assessments demonstrate significant variation between expert observers (as represented by low kappa values) and have limited ability to assess many biological processes that produce little histologic changes, for example, acute injury. Consensus rules and guidelines for histologic diagnosis are useful but may have errors. Risks of over- or under-treatment can be serious: many therapies for transplant rejection or primary diseases are expensive and carry risk for significant adverse effects. Improved diagnostic methods could alleviate healthcare costs by reducing treatment errors, increase treatment efficacy, and serve as useful endpoints for clinical trials of new agents that can improve outcomes. Molecular diagnostic assessments using microarrays combined with machine learning algorithms for interpretation have shown promise for increasing diagnostic precision via probabilistic assessments, recalibrating standard of care diagnostic methods, clarifying ambiguous cases, and identifying potentially missed cases of rejection. This review describes the development and application of the Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx), and discusses the history and reasoning behind many common methods, statistical practices, and computational decisions employed to ensure that MMDx scores are as accurate and precise as possible. MMDx provides insights on disease processes and highly reproducible results from a comparatively small amount of tissue and constitutes a general approach that is useful in many areas of medicine, including kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplants, with the possibility of extrapolating lessons for understanding native organ disease states.
在评估移植排斥和组织损伤方面,提高准确性和精密度的需求非常迫切。依靠组织学和视觉评估的诊断方法在专家观察者之间存在显著差异(表现为低kappa 值),并且评估许多产生很少组织学变化的生物学过程的能力有限,例如急性损伤。组织学诊断的共识规则和指南虽然有用,但可能存在错误。过度或治疗不足的风险可能很严重:许多移植排斥或原发性疾病的治疗方法昂贵且存在严重不良反应的风险。改进的诊断方法可以通过减少治疗错误、提高治疗效果来减轻医疗保健成本,并作为改善新药物临床试验结果的有用终点,这些新药物可以改善结果。使用微阵列和机器学习算法进行解释的分子诊断评估已显示出通过概率评估提高诊断精度、重新校准标准护理诊断方法、澄清模棱两可的病例以及识别潜在漏诊的排斥病例的潜力。这篇综述描述了 Molecular Microscope® 诊断系统(MMDx)的开发和应用,并讨论了许多常见方法、统计实践和计算决策背后的历史和推理,这些方法、实践和决策被用来确保 MMDx 评分尽可能准确和精确。MMDx 提供了关于疾病过程的见解,并从相对较少的组织中获得高度可重复的结果,构成了一种通用方法,在包括肾、心、肺和肝移植在内的许多医学领域都很有用,并且有可能为理解天然器官疾病状态提供经验教训。