Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No.30, Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 May 31;316(6):304. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03029-6.
For dupilumab, real-world long-term follow-up data remain scarce, and studies on optimized treatment modes as well as drug survival rate and its predictors are lacking. To explore the effectiveness of different treatment modes of dupilumab and to understand the drug survival rates of dupilumab in China and its predictive factors. This retrospective study included patients with moderate-to-severe AD who received dupilumab treatment. Their clinical data were collected and analyzed. Compared with baseline, the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), numerical rating scale (NRS), and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) scores significantly decreased at 12, 24, and 52 weeks (p < 0.0001), and the continuous medication group had more significant improvements in SCORAD, EASI, NRS, and ADCT scores at 52 weeks than the noncontinuous medication group (p < 0.05). The 6-month and 1-year drug survival rates of dupilumab were 59.7% and 51.9%, respectively. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was the satisfactory control of AD. Patients with adult-onset AD (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.73) , not complicated by other systemic diseases (adjusted OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.84) and eosinophilia at baseline (adjusted OR: 3.71, 95% CI: 1.12-12.26) had a higher probability of drug discontinuation. In real-world practice in China, dupilumab has exhibited good long-term effectiveness and safety for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, and continuous administration can benefit patients in the long term.
对于度普利尤单抗,真实世界的长期随访数据仍然很少,缺乏关于优化治疗模式以及药物生存率及其预测因素的研究。为了探索度普利尤单抗的不同治疗模式的有效性,并了解度普利尤单抗在中国的药物生存率及其预测因素。本回顾性研究纳入了接受度普利尤单抗治疗的中重度 AD 患者,收集并分析其临床数据。与基线相比,12、24 和 52 周时 SCORing 特应性皮炎(SCORAD)、湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、数字评分量表(NRS)和特应性皮炎控制工具(ADCT)评分均显著降低(p<0.0001),且连续用药组在 52 周时的 SCORAD、EASI、NRS 和 ADCT 评分改善更显著,优于非连续用药组(p<0.05)。度普利尤单抗的 6 个月和 1 年药物生存率分别为 59.7%和 51.9%。治疗中断的最常见原因是 AD 得到满意控制。成人发病 AD(调整优势比 [OR]:0.15,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.03-0.73)、无其他系统性疾病合并症(调整 OR:0.17,95% CI:0.04-0.84)和基线时嗜酸性粒细胞增多(调整 OR:3.71,95% CI:1.12-12.26)的患者停药的可能性更高。在中国的真实世界实践中,度普利尤单抗治疗中重度 AD 的长期疗效和安全性良好,连续用药可使患者长期获益。