• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量证据表明,Placerias hesternus 上颌犬齿状突起存在性二态性,表明存在性选择。

Quantitative evidence for dimorphism suggests sexual selection in the maxillary caniniform process of Placerias hesternus.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0297894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297894. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0297894
PMID:38820280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11142433/
Abstract

Placerias hesternus, a Late Triassic dicynodont, is one of the last megafaunal synapsids of the Mesozoic. The species has a tusk-like projection on its maxillary bone, known as the caniniform process. This process has been hypothesized to be sexually dimorphic since the 1950s, however this claim has not been thoroughly investigated quantitatively. Here, we examined maxillae, premaxillae, quadrates, and fibulae from a single population from the Placerias Quarry in the Blue Mesa Member of the Chinle Formation, near St. Johns, Arizona, USA to determine if the caniniform process is dimorphic. We made a total of 25 measurements from the four bones and used a maximum likelihood framework to compare the fit of unimodal versus bimodal distributions for each set of measurements. Our results from complete maxillae reveal that the caniniform process has two distinct morphs, with a shorter and longer form. This interpretation is substantiated both by strong statistical support for bimodal distribution of caniniform lengths, and by clustering analysis that clearly distinguishes two morphs for the maxillae. Clustering analysis also shows support for potential dimorphism in the shape of the quadrate. However, no measurements from elements other than the maxilla have a strong likelihood of bimodal distribution. These results support the long-standing hypothesis that the caniniform in Placerias was dimorphic. Alternative explanations to sexual dimorphism that could account for the dimorphism among these fossils include the presence of juveniles in the sample or time-averaged sampling of a chronospecies, but both have been previously rejected for the Placerias Quarry population. The lack of strong dimorphism in non-maxilla elements and increased variation in caniniform length of the large-caniniform morph suggest that the caniniform is a secondary sexual trait, possibly used in intraspecific competition.

摘要

晚三叠世的 Placerias hesternus 是中生代最后一批巨型合弓兽之一。该物种的上颌骨上有一个类似于獠牙的突起,称为犬齿状突起。自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,人们一直假设这个突起具有性别二态性,但这一说法尚未得到彻底的定量研究。在这里,我们检查了来自美国亚利桑那州圣约翰附近蓝礁组的 Placerias Quarry 的单个种群的上颌骨、前上颌骨、方骨和腓骨,以确定犬齿状突起是否具有二态性。我们总共从这四块骨头中进行了 25 项测量,并使用最大似然框架比较了每种测量结果的单峰和双峰分布的拟合程度。我们从完整上颌骨得到的结果表明,犬齿状突起有两种不同的形态,一种较短,另一种较长。这一解释不仅得到了犬齿状突起长度双峰分布的强有力的统计支持,而且聚类分析也清楚地将两种形态区分开来。聚类分析还表明,方骨的形态也可能存在潜在的二态性。然而,除了上颌骨之外的其他元素的测量值都没有双峰分布的强烈可能性。这些结果支持了犬齿状突起在 Placerias 中具有性别二态性的长期假说。除了性二态性之外,还有其他可能导致这些化石存在二态性的解释,包括样本中存在幼年个体或对一个chronospecies 的时间平均采样,但这些解释都已经被先前对 Placerias Quarry 种群的研究否定了。非上颌骨元素中没有强烈的二态性,以及大犬齿状突起的犬齿状突起长度变化较大,这表明犬齿状突起是一种次要的性特征,可能用于种内竞争。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/d55c1d3d5d12/pone.0297894.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/270178ba9252/pone.0297894.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/ccdc214a7b3b/pone.0297894.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/ab7731072f5f/pone.0297894.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/fa8f52da347e/pone.0297894.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/aa6295e2285b/pone.0297894.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/1ee0171357ce/pone.0297894.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/5a0c4504a3d2/pone.0297894.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/b10f215c8b73/pone.0297894.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/559c61030ef8/pone.0297894.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/c16b06f205e6/pone.0297894.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/b5d62d3d12a7/pone.0297894.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/1c76ba8bcea0/pone.0297894.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/0405e4ab4f34/pone.0297894.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/8bb348381baa/pone.0297894.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/7efe30de7386/pone.0297894.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/d55c1d3d5d12/pone.0297894.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/270178ba9252/pone.0297894.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/ccdc214a7b3b/pone.0297894.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/ab7731072f5f/pone.0297894.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/fa8f52da347e/pone.0297894.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/aa6295e2285b/pone.0297894.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/1ee0171357ce/pone.0297894.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/5a0c4504a3d2/pone.0297894.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/b10f215c8b73/pone.0297894.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/559c61030ef8/pone.0297894.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/c16b06f205e6/pone.0297894.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/b5d62d3d12a7/pone.0297894.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/1c76ba8bcea0/pone.0297894.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/0405e4ab4f34/pone.0297894.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/8bb348381baa/pone.0297894.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/7efe30de7386/pone.0297894.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b25/11142433/d55c1d3d5d12/pone.0297894.g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative evidence for dimorphism suggests sexual selection in the maxillary caniniform process of Placerias hesternus.定量证据表明,Placerias hesternus 上颌犬齿状突起存在性二态性,表明存在性选择。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0297894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297894. eCollection 2024.
2
A new short-faced archosauriform from the Upper Triassic Placerias/Downs' quarry complex, Arizona, USA, expands the morphological diversity of the Triassic archosauriform radiation.来自美国亚利桑那州上三叠统 Placerias/Downs 采石场复合体的一种新的短面兽脚亚目恐龙,扩展了三叠纪兽脚亚目辐射的形态多样性。
Naturwissenschaften. 2021 Jul 2;108(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s00114-021-01733-1.
3
Evidence for Sexual Dimorphism in the Plated Dinosaur Stegosaurus mjosi (Ornithischia, Stegosauria) from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Western USA.来自美国西部莫里森组(上侏罗统)的装甲恐龙穆氏剑龙(鸟臀目,剑龙科)两性异形的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123503. eCollection 2015.
4
The Permian mammal-like herbivore Diictodon, the oldest known example of sexually dimorphic armament.二叠纪的似哺乳草食动物二齿兽,是已知最古老的两性异形武器的例子。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 22;270(1511):173-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2189.
5
A geometric morphometric approach to the analysis of skull shape in Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from South America.一种用于分析南美洲三叠纪二齿兽类(兽孔目,缺齿亚目)头骨形状的几何形态测量方法。
J Morphol. 2019 Dec;280(12):1808-1820. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21066. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
6
Morphological variation of the maxilla in modern humans and African apes.现代人上颌骨的形态变化与非洲猿类。
J Hum Evol. 2022 Jul;168:103210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103210. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
Fossil evidence sheds light on sexual selection during the early evolution of birds.化石证据揭示了鸟类早期进化过程中的性选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 16;121(3):e2309825120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309825120. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
Intraspecific mating system evolution and its effect on complex male secondary sexual traits: Does male-male competition increase selection on size or shape?种内交配系统演化及其对复杂雄性次级性特征的影响:雄性间竞争是否会增加对大小或形状的选择?
J Evol Biol. 2020 Mar;33(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13565. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
9
On the validity and phylogenetic position of Eubrachiosaurus browni, a kannemeyeriiform dicynodont (Anomodontia) from Triassic North America.布朗氏始巨鳄龙(肯氏兽形亚目)有效性和系统发育位置的研究,来自于北美三叠纪。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064203. Print 2013.
10
Correlation between investment in sexual traits and valve sexual dimorphism in Cyprideis species (Ostracoda).金星介科(介形纲)物种中性特征投资与瓣膜两性异形之间的相关性。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0177791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177791. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of the synapsid tusk: insights from dicynodont therapsid tusk histology.合弓兽獠牙的演化:来自二齿兽形类合弓兽獠牙组织学的见解。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Oct 27;288(1961):20211670. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1670.
2
Contrasting selection pressure on body and weapon size in a polygynous megaherbivore.多配偶巨型草食动物的身体和武器大小受到相反的选择压力。
Biol Lett. 2021 Oct;17(10):20210368. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0368. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
A geometric morphometric approach to the analysis of skull shape in Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from South America.
一种用于分析南美洲三叠纪二齿兽类(兽孔目,缺齿亚目)头骨形状的几何形态测量方法。
J Morphol. 2019 Dec;280(12):1808-1820. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21066. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
An elephant-sized Late Triassic synapsid with erect limbs.一种体型如大象的晚三叠世合弓兽,四肢直立。
Science. 2019 Jan 4;363(6422):78-80. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4853. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Intrasexually selected weapons.同性内选择的武器。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Feb;94(1):60-101. doi: 10.1111/brv.12436. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Redescription of () (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia: Aetosauria) from the Late Triassic of the Southwestern United States with a discussion of genera in vertebrate paleontology.对美国西南部晚三叠世的()(主龙类:伪鳄类:坚蜥目)进行重新描述,并讨论脊椎动物古生物学中的属。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 2;6:e4291. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4291. eCollection 2018.
7
Why Sexually Selected Weapons Are Not Ornaments.为什么性选择武器不是装饰品。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Oct;31(10):742-751. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
On the validity and phylogenetic position of Eubrachiosaurus browni, a kannemeyeriiform dicynodont (Anomodontia) from Triassic North America.布朗氏始巨鳄龙(肯氏兽形亚目)有效性和系统发育位置的研究,来自于北美三叠纪。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064203. Print 2013.
9
Sexual selection in prehistoric animals: detection and implications.史前动物的性选择:检测与启示。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jan;28(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
10
A universal scaling relationship between body mass and proximal limb bone dimensions in quadrupedal terrestrial tetrapods.四足陆地四足动物的体质量与近侧肢体骨骼尺寸之间的通用比例关系。
BMC Biol. 2012 Jul 10;10:60. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-60.