Suppr超能文献

骨组织中 DNA 保存的奥秘:应用衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱法对岩骨和掌骨骨骺的比较研究。

The mysteries of DNA preservation in bone: A comparative study of petrous bones and metacarpal epiphyses using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy.

机构信息

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Zavetiška 5, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.

National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2024 Jul;360:112076. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112076. Epub 2024 May 28.

Abstract

A comparative analysis of 26 petrous bones and epiphyses of metacarpals from the Second World War era revealed no significant differences in DNA yield or success in STR typing. This unexpected parity in DNA preservation between the petrous bone, a renowned source of endogenous DNA in skeletal remains, and the epiphyses of metacarpals, which are porous and susceptible to taphonomic changes, is surprising. In this study, we introduced ATR-FTIR spectroscopy as an approach to unravel the correlation between bone molecular structure and DNA preservation. Metacarpals and petrous bones with same taphonomic history were sampled and prepared for DNA analyses. While one portion of the sample was used for DNA analysis, the other underwent ATR-FTIR spectroscopic examination. The normalized spectra and FTIR indices between the epiphyses of metacarpals and petrous bones were compared. Because the taphonomic history of the remains used is relatively short and stable, the ATR-FTIR spectroscopy unveiled subtle structural differences between the two bone types. Petrous bones exhibited higher mineralization, whereas epiphyses contained more organic matter. The unexpected preservation of DNA in the epiphyses of metacarpals can likely be attributed to the presence of soft tissue remnants within the trabeculae. Here observed differences in the molecular structure of bones indicate there are different mechanisms enabling DNA preservation in skeletal tissues.

摘要

对来自第二次世界大战时期的 26 例岩骨和掌骨骨骺进行了比较分析,结果显示 DNA 产量或 STR 分型成功率没有显著差异。这一结果令人惊讶,因为岩骨是骨骼遗骸中内源性 DNA 的著名来源,而掌骨骨骺则是多孔且易受埋藏学变化影响的部位,在 DNA 保存方面,这两者之间竟然没有明显差异。在本研究中,我们引入了 ATR-FTIR 光谱学作为一种方法,以揭示骨分子结构与 DNA 保存之间的相关性。选择具有相同埋藏史的掌骨和岩骨进行采样和 DNA 分析。一部分样本用于 DNA 分析,另一部分则进行 ATR-FTIR 光谱学检查。比较掌骨骨骺和岩骨的归一化光谱和 FTIR 指数。由于所使用的遗骸埋藏史相对较短且稳定,ATR-FTIR 光谱揭示了这两种骨类型之间的细微结构差异。岩骨的矿化程度较高,而骨骺则含有更多的有机物。掌骨骨骺中 DNA 的意外保存可能归因于小梁内软组织残余物的存在。这里观察到的骨骼分子结构差异表明,在骨骼组织中存在不同的 DNA 保存机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验