Suppr超能文献

在加热盐水增强射频针尖导管消融过程中潜在的微栓塞形成风险及其管理。

Potential microemboli formation risk and its management during the heated saline-enhanced radiofrequency needle-tip catheter ablation.

机构信息

Translational Interventional Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/St. Marys Campus, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Cardiology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Translational Interventional Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/St. Marys Campus, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Cardiology, Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2024 Dec;21(12):2521-2529. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.050. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The potential risk of embolic events during ablation in the left ventricle (LV) with a heated saline-enhanced radiofrequency (SERF) needle-tip ablation catheter has not been characterized.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the formation of microemboli or other untoward events during SERF ablation.

METHODS

Ninety-three radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures were performed in the LV of 14 pigs by using a SERF catheter (35 W, 70 seconds, and 60°C; normal or degassed saline [NS or DS] irrigation with a flow rate of 10 mL/min) vs a standard irrigated-tip radiofrequency (S-RF) catheter (30 or 50 W, 30 seconds, and 17 mL/min). Microbubble formation was graded on the basis of intracardiac echocardiography. Microbubbles, microembolic signals, and microparticles were monitored using our established model.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in microbubble volume among SERF-NS, SERF-DS, and S-RF 30 W with "grade 1" intracardiac echocardiography microbubbles (median and 25th-75th percentiles 0.201 [0.011-3.13], 0.455 [0.06-2.66], and 0.004 μL [0.00-0.16 μL], respectively). There was no significant difference in microembolic signals among SERF-NS, SERF-DS, and S-RF 30 W with grade 1 bubbles (n = 8.0 ± 5.8, n = 7.6 ± 4.2, and n = 6.1 ± 6.1, respectively). Both SERF-NS and SERF-DS created larger lesions than did both S-RF 30 W and S-RF 50 W deliveries (mean 1241.5 ± 658.6, 1497.7 ± 893.4, 75.0 ± 24.8, and 184.0 ± 93.8 mm; P < .001). There was no significant difference in microparticle incidence among groups (P = .675). No evidence of embolic events was found in the brain and other organs at the histology assessment.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of SERF ablation, significantly large LV lesions can be created without any increment in embolic microbubble or particle events. Grade 1 microbubble is related to the efficacy and safety.

摘要

背景

在使用加热盐水增强射频(SERF)针尖消融导管进行左心室(LV)消融时,栓塞事件的潜在风险尚未得到明确。

目的

本研究旨在探讨 SERF 消融过程中微栓子或其他不良事件的形成情况。

方法

采用 SERF 导管(35 W,70 秒,60°C;正常或除气盐水[NS 或 DS]以 10 mL/min 的流速冲洗)和标准灌流射频(S-RF)导管(30 或 50 W,30 秒,17 mL/min)对 14 头猪的 93 次射频消融术进行研究。根据心内超声心动图对微泡形成进行分级。使用我们建立的模型监测微泡、微栓子信号和微颗粒。

结果

SERF-NS、SERF-DS 和 S-RF 30 W 组“1 级”心内超声心动图微泡的微泡体积无显著差异(中位数和 25 至 75 百分位数分别为 0.201[0.011-3.13]、0.455[0.06-2.66]和 0.004 μL[0.00-0.16 μL])。SERF-NS、SERF-DS 和 S-RF 30 W 组 1 级气泡的微栓子信号无显著差异(分别为 n=8.0±5.8、n=7.6±4.2 和 n=6.1±6.1)。SERF-NS 和 SERF-DS 产生的消融灶明显大于 S-RF 30 W 和 S-RF 50 W(平均 1241.5±658.6、1497.7±893.4、75.0±24.8 和 184.0±93.8 mm;P<.001)。各组间微颗粒发生率无显著差异(P=0.675)。组织学评估未发现脑和其他器官有栓塞事件的证据。

结论

在 SERF 消融中,可在不增加微栓子或微颗粒栓塞事件的情况下,显著增大 LV 消融灶。1 级微泡与疗效和安全性相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验