Suppr超能文献

ACR 适宜性标准®头晕和共济失调:2023 年更新。

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dizziness and Ataxia: 2023 Update.

机构信息

University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Research Author, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Jun;21(6S):S100-S125. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.018.

Abstract

Diagnostic evaluation of a patient with dizziness or vertigo is complicated by a lack of standardized nomenclature, significant overlap in symptom descriptions, and the subjective nature of the patient's symptoms. Although dizziness is an imprecise term often used by patients to describe a feeling of being off-balance, in many cases dizziness can be subcategorized based on symptomatology as vertigo (false sense of motion or spinning), disequilibrium (imbalance with gait instability), presyncope (nearly fainting or blacking out), or lightheadedness (nonspecific). As such, current diagnostic paradigms focus on timing, triggers, and associated symptoms rather than subjective descriptions of dizziness type. Regardless, these factors complicate the selection of appropriate diagnostic imaging in patients presenting with dizziness or vertigo. This document serves to aid providers in this selection by using a framework of definable clinical variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

摘要

对头晕或眩晕患者的诊断评估受到缺乏标准化命名法、症状描述存在显著重叠以及患者症状的主观性的影响。尽管头晕是患者用来描述失衡感的不精确术语,但在许多情况下,头晕可以根据症状学进行分类,包括眩晕(虚假运动或旋转感)、失衡(步态不稳伴失衡)、晕厥前状态(几乎晕厥或昏倒)或头晕(非特异性)。因此,当前的诊断范式侧重于时间、触发因素和相关症状,而不是对头晕类型的主观描述。尽管如此,这些因素使得在出现头晕或眩晕的患者中选择合适的诊断成像变得复杂。本文档旨在通过使用可定义的临床变异体框架来帮助提供者进行这种选择。美国放射学院适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的基于证据的指南,每年由多学科专家小组进行审查。指南的制定和修订过程支持对同行评议期刊的医学文献进行系统分析。既定的方法学原则,如推荐评估、制定和评估分级或 GRADE,被用于评估证据。RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法用户手册提供了用于确定特定临床情况下成像和治疗程序适宜性的方法。在缺乏或存在争议的同行评议文献的情况下,专家可能是制定建议的主要证据来源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验