University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Research Author, Allegheny Health Network Imaging Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Jun;21(6S):S237-S248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.024.
This document summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of preprocedural imaging in three clinical scenarios in patients needing endovascular treatment or cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. These clinical scenarios include preprocedural imaging prior to radiofrequency ablation; prior to left atrial appendage occlusion; and prior to cardioversion. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
本文件总结了在需要血管内治疗或房颤转复的患者的三个临床情况下,选择术前影像学检查的相关文献。这些临床情况包括射频消融术前、左心耳封堵术前和转复术前的影像学检查。根据每种临床情况,将影像学检查方法的适用性评定为通常适用、可能适用和通常不适用,以帮助选择相应临床情况下最合适的影像学检查方法。美国放射学院的适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的循证指南,每年由多学科专家小组进行审查。指南的制定和修订过程支持对同行评议期刊的医学文献进行系统分析。既定的方法学原则,如推荐评估、制定和评估分级或 GRADE,被用于评估证据。RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法用户手册提供了用于确定特定临床情况下影像学检查和治疗程序适宜性的方法。在缺乏或存在争议的情况下,专家可能是制定建议的主要证据来源。